The World Between Us
In September 2025, a presidential proclamation introduced a $100,000 supplemental payment requirement for employers petitioning for new H-1B visas. This move represented a massive increase from standard regulatory and statutory fees, which typically ranged between $960 and $7,595. The policy aimed to reform a program that the administration claimed had been exploited to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign labor, particularly in technology fields. However, the high cost had an immediate "chilling effect" on recruitment, with one federal agency receiving only 85 payments for the fee by mid-February 2026, a small fraction of the usual volume.On June 8, 2026, a federal court in Massachusetts struck down this fee, declaring it unlawful and unconstitutional. The ruling concluded that the $100,000 requirement functioned not as a regulatory fee but as an unauthorized tax. Under the U.S. Constitution, the power to levy taxes is exclusively vested in Congress, and the executive branch cannot exercise this power without a clear, specific delegation of authority. While the administration argued it possessed broad discretion under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to restrict the entry of noncitizens, the court found that the relevant sections of the law did not encompass the power to tax.The court further determined that federal agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by implementing the fee without the required notice-and-comment rulemaking process, which allows for public input on major policy changes. The implementation was also deemed arbitrary and capricious because agencies failed to offer a reasoned explanation for the drastic shift in policy or consider the reliance interests of employers who depend on the program. The ruling resulted in a nationwide vacatur, effectively nullifying the policy for all employers across the country rather than just the twenty states that originally brought the lawsuit.The legal challenge was driven by concerns that the fee would cripple critical public sectors, including healthcare, K-12 education, and higher education. Public institutions argued the cost effectively priced them out of the H-1B program, threatening their ability to address systemic staffing shortages for specialized roles like teachers, researchers, and physicians. While many stakeholders welcomed the decision as necessary relief, legal uncertainty remains because the administration is expected to appeal the ruling. A conflicting earlier ruling from a different federal court in Washington, D.C., which had upheld the fee, suggests the matter may eventually require resolution by an appellate court or the Supreme Court. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-world-between-us--6886561/support [https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-world-between-us--6886561/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss].
565 episoder
Kommentarer
0Vær den første til at kommentere
Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af The World Between Us-fællesskabet!