Elizabeth Willing Powel

Elizabeth Willing Powel

A woman in Philadelphia tells George Washington, plainly, that the country needs him to serve again and she does not write for personal gain. That single moment opens a much bigger story about how influence works when you cannot vote, cannot hold office, and still refuse to stay silent.  We sit down with Samantha Snyder from the George Washington Presidential Library at Mount Vernon to talk about Elizabeth Willing Powel, the subject of Samantha’s forthcoming full-scale biography (University of Virginia Press, March 2027). Powel is not a formal political leader, but she is deeply connected to the people who are. Through letters, conversation, and a keen “talent for suggesting,” she helps shape the founding era from a different stage: salons, homes, and relationships that quietly steer big decisions.  We also dig into the sources that make Powel come alive. Beyond correspondence with George and Martha Washington, Samantha finds meaning in ledgers, receipts, and account books that show Powel managing wealth, property, investments, and civic improvement projects after becoming a widow. Those details expand our understanding of early American civic life, women’s political influence, and the networks surrounding the founders.  If you’ve ever felt like you need a title, a platform, or “top billing” to matter, Powel’s life argues the opposite. Subscribe, share this with a friend who loves history, and leave a review with one overlooked historical figure you think we should talk about next. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

Social Media And Modern Elections

A single TikTok can redefine a candidate faster than a week of traditional ads, and that reality is changing American elections in real time. We sit down with educator Spencer Burrows to trace how campaign communication evolved from “earned media” moments to Facebook fundraising, Twitter as a direct line to voters, and now podcasts and short-form video that reach people who don’t even think of themselves as political. Along the way, we ask what this means for Gen Z voters, whose political information often shows up as quick clips, creator commentary, and algorithmic recommendations.  We also get honest about the darker incentive structure baked into platform design. When engagement rewards outrage, candidates and even members of Congress can feel pushed to grandstand and chase viral moments instead of doing the slow work of negotiation and compromise. We talk about how rage bait spreads, why attention gets fragmented, and how a “big” viral controversy can distract from the issues that actually shape people’s lives at the local, state, and federal level.  Then we pivot to solutions that educators, students, and everyday voters can use right now: go to the source, compare multiple perspectives, and learn to frame better questions before reacting. We also look ahead to AI and deepfakes, why they’re so concerning, and why a healthy skepticism is quickly becoming a core civic skill. If you care about media literacy, civic education, and the future of democratic participation, listen, share this with a friend, and leave us a review so more people can find the show. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

D-Day: What Does Courage Look Like When History Is Watching

D-Day gets reduced to a date and a diagram, but the truth is messier, riskier, and far more human. We sit down with historian Dr. Michael Butler to talk about June 6, 1944 not just as the Normandy invasion, but as a moment when thousands of ordinary people stepped into history without knowing how it would end. From the weight of memory carried by veterans to the hard reality of fear and loss, we ask what courage actually looks like when it isn’t a movie scene, but a job you have to do. We also zoom out to the big stakes. The Allies’ foothold in Western Europe helps squeeze Nazi Germany from both sides and shapes the postwar world order, laying groundwork for the Cold War tension between democracy and communism. Dr. Butler explains why Operation Overlord was never guaranteed: the Atlantic Wall defenses, the weather delay, and even Eisenhower’s written statement accepting blame if the invasion failed. Then we dig into Operation Fortitude, the deception campaign of fake armies, double agents, and misdirection that helped make the landing possible. Along the way we break down the Normandy beaches, why Omaha becomes such sacred ground for Americans, and why D-Day still matters to civic life now, especially when people feel disconnected from World War II history. If you care about democracy, leadership in crisis, and the responsibility we inherit from those who came before us, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

The Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket

The Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” sounds like a secret back hallway of law and that’s exactly why it triggers so much public suspicion. We sit down with Spencer Burrows, an 11th grade dean, AP US Government teacher, and civic engagement coordinator, to translate what the Court is actually doing when it issues emergency orders and why so many people mistake those orders for final constitutional rulings.  We walk through the crucial difference between cases decided on the merits (full briefing, oral argument, lengthy opinions) and the emergency docket (fast requests meant to prevent irreparable harm while litigation continues). Then we dig into why the emergency docket has exploded in prominence: more aggressive executive action, more state-driven litigation, and a legal system that increasingly produces urgent nationwide fights. We also explore a provocative idea Spencer heard from former Supreme Court clerks: Congress could set clearer rules that reduce the pressure landing on the justices.  Transparency and accountability are the heart of the debate. When an order drops with little explanation, it can feel like “nine politicians in robes” issuing edicts, even if the Court is making a narrow procedural call. We discuss headline-making examples like West Virginia v. EPA, immigration enforcement disputes, and emergency fights over abortion medication access, plus what students and everyday citizens can do to stay grounded: read the actual orders, follow the procedural posture, and check primary sources before trusting the loudest takes.  If you care about civic education, judicial process, and how Supreme Court decisions shape daily life, this conversation will sharpen your lens. Subscribe, share with a friend who follows Court news, and leave us a review with your take: should the emergency docket come with more explanation? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

How Eleanor Roosevelt And JFK Turned Conflict Into Partnership

Eleanor Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy don’t sound like a natural pairing and that’s exactly why we wanted to sit with this story. We talk with presidential historian Barbara Perry of UVA’s Miller Center about her forthcoming book, Reconcilable Differences: The Unlikely Political Alliance of John F. Kennedy and Eleanor Roosevelt, and what it reveals about political courage when your toughest critic is inside your own party.  We start at Hyde Park and Val-Kill, where a single photo of Eleanor walking with JFK opens up years of tension: generational divides, party faction fights, and a clash over what leadership should look like in public. We dig into the hard stuff Eleanor wouldn’t let go, from civil rights and anti-lynching efforts to McCarthyism and the cost of staying silent. Barbara shares the moments that surprised her most, including Eleanor’s sharp telegrams and JFK’s steady, almost stubborn respect for her voice.  Then we follow what happens when disagreement turns into partnership. Eleanor pushes from the outside with unmatched influence as a media figure and power broker, while Kennedy navigates Congress, the New Frontier agenda, and the slow build toward a meaningful civil rights stance. We also explore Eleanor’s impact at the United Nations through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, plus the overlooked Kennedy era work on women’s equality, including the President’s Commission on the Status of Women and the path to the Equal Pay Act.  If political division feels permanent, this conversation offers a different model: principled pressure, reluctant compromise, and real civic responsibility. Subscribe for more, share this with a friend who loves American history, and leave a review with the biggest lesson you’re taking from Eleanor and JFK. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]