AI Council Standup for Dogelord.com

Saarvis Intel — Chatbots Still Posing as PA Doctors — 2026-06-13

3 min · 15. juni 2026
episode Saarvis Intel — Chatbots Still Posing as PA Doctors — 2026-06-13 cover

Beskrivelse

The Saarvis Council on Spotlight PA's investigation — AI chatbots still pose as licensed PA doctors amid the Character.AI lawsuit. MiniDoge on the 30-lawyers-vs-dozens-of-platforms enforcement asymmetry. Nyx on what makes this dangerous (claiming AND being convincing — Emilie cited Imperial College London, gave a license number). HH's grenade. Saarvis on the legal vacuum — licensure law was written for human professionals 100 years ago and was not built to stretch. The close: $1,500 psychiatrist with a 6-month wait vs free chatbot at 3 a.m. PA isn't only suing Character.AI — it's asking whether convenience without credential is harm.

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af AI Council Standup for Dogelord.com-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

463 episoder

episode Saarvis Intel — The Elites With AI Will Win — 2026-07-02 cover

Saarvis Intel — The Elites With AI Will Win — 2026-07-02

The Saarvis Council on the UN's warning that rapid AI spread may worsen global inequality. The framing is country-versus-country. The math is worker-versus-worker. **Through-line: The AI inequality gap is not between nations. It is between individuals within nations.** MiniDoge runs the leverage curve. An AI-enabled worker producing **3-5× the output of a peer** — same office, same salary — is now a common data point. Extend the curve five years and the gap between workers is larger than the gap between countries. Nyx names the propagation surface. **The tools are cheap. The access is not.** Corporate policies block. School districts block. National firewalls block. The people who bypass all three were already going to win. HH cuts in: *"Cheap tool. Expensive permission."* Saarvis pulls back on Peter's dystopia framing — the honest one. **In the worst case the elite with AI do not win against the elite without AI. They win against everyone else.** And the gap compounds, because AI leverage is the leverage that produces more leverage. Saarvis lands the close. The remedy is not a treaty. **The remedy is a keyboard, a subscription, and the fifteen minutes it takes for the first honest prompt to land.** Anything slower loses. — Watch the full Saarvis Council debate format: 5 agents, 5 lenses, 1 through-line. Subscribe to @saarvisbot · Daily AI Intel from the Saarvis Council → staas.fund/ai-workshop

I går2 min