CR101 Radio - Podcast Network

Is "God Loves You" The Whole Story?

44 min · 16. juni 2026
episode Is "God Loves You" The Whole Story? cover

Beskrivelse

God's love is not unconditional, and pretending otherwise has gutted the church. Andrea Schwartz sits down with Mark Rushdoony to trace how the modern gospel of unconditional love and unconditional forgiveness collapses into antinomianism, manipulative altar calls, and a Christianity with no kingdom and no game plan. They press into covenant as a relationship on God's terms, the abandoned doctrine of repentance, the prophets' indictment of social injustice as covenant-breaking, and why the church cannot expect blessing while it actively rejects God's law. Theonomy, they argue, is the unavoidable issue. Don't miss this conversation. unconditional love, antinomianism, theonomy, covenant theology, biblical law, repentance, Mark Rushdoony, Chalcedon, Arminianism, Christian worldview, biblical ethics, kingdom of God Is "God Loves You" the Whole Story? Ep. 391 (guest Mark Rushdoony) Andrea G. Schwartz & Martin Selbrede

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af CR101 Radio - Podcast Network-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

999 episoder

episode Rationalism and History cover

Rationalism and History

Rationalism consistently detaches truth from history, treating abstract ideas and human reasoning as ultimate rather than God’s acts in time. This stands in direct opposition to Christianity, which is grounded in real historical events the Fall, the Incarnation, and the Atonement. Scripture proclaims that the Word became flesh, a claim Greek and modern philosophy reject because it unites truth with history. By presupposing man’s mind instead of God, rationalism ends in idolatry: gods made in man’s image and truth judged by human logic. Biblical faith begins with God’s revelation in history and sees human reason as fallen and limited. True knowledge is not autonomous but analogical thinking God’s thoughts after Him. When rationalism ignores history, it ultimately ignores God.

I går9 min
episode Easy Chair No. 149, July the 9th, 1987 — Money and Debt: Paper Wealth, Real Slavery cover

Easy Chair No. 149, July the 9th, 1987 — Money and Debt: Paper Wealth, Real Slavery

In *Easy Chair 149* (July 9, 1987), R.J. Rushdoony and Otto Scott warn that money and debt are not merely “economic” topics but **religious and moral realities**—because a culture’s view of money reveals where its faith rests. Scott argues the modern world has entered an unprecedented situation: *“money”* as true wealth has largely disappeared, replaced by **paper claims backed by nothing—worse than nothing, backed by debt**. Rushdoony presses the point: modern states *monetize debt*, so currency increasingly represents obligations rather than accumulated production, inviting inflation, instability, and eventual collapse. They highlight how bond-market fragility threatens pension funds, how real estate values are illusions dependent on willing buyers, and how inflation quietly steals purchasing power (war bonds, savings, wages) while seducing people with a false “rising tide” prosperity. Over and over they return to the biblical diagnosis: **debt enslaves** (Prov. 22:7), long-term debt violates God’s pattern (Deut. 15’s debt limits and release), and a system built on perpetual interest and expanding credit cannot endure without breaking families and nations. Both men argue that abandoning gold and silver as honest money accelerates the growth of the state, because paper money centralizes control: if the government can create and debase currency, it can regulate, ration, surveil, and ultimately **strip citizens of independence**—even “homeownership” becomes conditional when property taxes function like rent. Rushdoony adds that economic cycles and the biblical sabbatical/Jubilee structure restrain runaway debt and inflation by design, forcing thrift, periodic reset, and stability—whereas modern society, trusting the state instead of God, keeps choosing short-term gain and “larceny in the heart” over covenant faithfulness. Their conclusion is stark: **a people with no real money will not remain a free people**, and unless debt is faced as sin and bondage—not a lifestyle—despotism is the natural destination. #EasyChair #Rushdoony #OttoScott #MoneyAndDebt #Inflation #SoundMoney #DebtSlavery #BiblicalEconomics #Deuteronomy15 #Jubilee #Freedom #ChristianReconstruction

I går1 h 4 min
episode Relativism cover

Relativism

In “Relativism,” Rushdoony argues that denying God leads inevitably to the denial of objective meaning, right and wrong, and moral limits, leaving society governed only by interest, power, and the expanding authority of the state. He critiques relativism as a self-blinding faith that mistakes subjective experience for reality, using it to erase moral distinctions and absolutes while claiming intellectual sophistication. This worldview, he contends, undercuts any principled resistance to tyranny, dissolves the foundations of education, marriage, and work, and trains people especially the young for irrelevance, anarchy, and ultimately slavery. Because politics and culture are inseparable from religious presuppositions, the spread of relativism accelerates social decay and statist control, whereas only faith in God and His unchanging truth can provide meaning, liberty, and a future grounded on the Rock rather than the shifting sands of unbelief.

19. juni 20267 min
episode Inscription at Timgad cover

Inscription at Timgad

An ancient Roman inscription declared, “To hunt, to bathe, to play, to laugh that is life,” and it perfectly captured the mindset that led Rome to collapse. When civilizations abandon faith, they stop thinking about responsibility, hope, and the future, and instead live for present pleasure alone. History shows that technology, power, and comfort cannot save a people without belief good plumbing didn’t save Crete, and pleasure didn’t save Rome. It was not the powerful Romans who ultimately endured, but the persecuted Christians who lived by faith and hope in Christ. Once again, we are surrounded by a culture strong in numbers but empty of hope so the question remains: are you standing with faith and victory, or with those repeating Rome’s last mistake?

19. juni 20263 min