CR101 Radio - Podcast Network

What Do You Stand For?

2 min · 3. juni 2026
episode What Do You Stand For? cover

Beskrivelse

A friend once read a woman a line from my book: “If we love that which is good, we will hate that which is evil.” The woman immediately rejected it, insisting, “I love everyone and hate nothing.” My friend quietly answered, “You don’t stand for anything, do you?” a perfect response. To hate nothing is to love nothing, because real love always hates whatever destroys the thing loved. I once dealt with a woman whose husband beat her, scarred her, committed adultery, and had begun to molest their daughter; yet she insisted, “I don’t hate him at all; I really love him.” Her refusal to hate evil ensured her continued destruction. Years later, her situation was even worse. This is the spirit of our age: people claim universal love, but stand for nothing, fight for nothing, and refuse to oppose evil. True love requires moral indignation; without hatred of evil, there is no real love of the good. And God’s verdict on such empty sentimentality will echo my friend’s words: “You don’t stand for anything, do you?”

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af CR101 Radio - Podcast Network-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

999 episoder

episode Easy Chair No. 153, September 4, 1987 - The Contemporary Influence of the Transcendentalists cover

Easy Chair No. 153, September 4, 1987 - The Contemporary Influence of the Transcendentalists

Dr. Rushdoony and Otto Scott analyze modernism as a cultural and intellectual force rooted in the Transcendentalists, particularly Emerson and Frothingham, which rejects God and biblical authority in favor of the spirit of the age. Modernism elevates human impulses, experience, and cultural trends above objective moral standards, affecting education, art, literature, and politics. Scott emphasizes that liberalism, as the practical expression of modernism, erodes societal norms and weakens resistance to evil, while Rushdoony warns that liberal clergy spread this ideology within churches. Together, they conclude modernism functions as an anti-Christian force, dismantling Christian civilization and replacing divine order with human-centered, relativistic values.

18. juli 20261 h 2 min
episode A Letter on Logic and Idolatry cover

A Letter on Logic and Idolatry

In “A Letter on Logic and Idolatry,” Rushdoony argues that rationalistic apologetics, rooted in Greek philosophy, commit idolatry by treating abstract logic especially the law of noncontradiction as ultimate and even governing God Himself, rather than recognizing logic as a created and ordained aspect of God’s order. He contends that Greek thought made abstractions ultimate to avoid infinite regress, while modern rationalists repeat the error by placing Aristotle’s logic over God, rendering their systems both irrational and blasphemous. Apart from the Creator, Rushdoony insists, reality collapses into billions of chance-accidents far greater “miracles” than Scripture records and even Darwin admitted such explanations fail. True rationality begins not with autonomous logic but with the triune God, who alone is the source and governor of all reality, including the valid laws of logic themselves. #VanTil #Rushdoony #PresuppositionalApologetics #LogicAndIdolatry #ChristianPhilosophy #GodIsUltimate #FaithAndReason #BiblicalTheism #Chalcedon

I går2 min