The NewCrits Podcast

The Forum 18 | Reginald Sylvester II: Discipline as Devotion

59 min · 5. mar. 2026
episode The Forum 18 | Reginald Sylvester II: Discipline as Devotion cover

Beskrivelse

Reginald Sylvester II approaches painting as a structure of discipline. What begins in daily rituals—routine, repetition, and care—extends into a larger philosophy about belief, responsibility, and endurance. Practice, for him, is not separate from life. It is shaped by it. Fatherhood, spiritual inquiry, and the demands of time become part of the architecture of the studio. Rather than protecting art from those pressures, Sylvester allows them to recalibrate how the work unfolds. The result is a practice grounded less in spectacle and more in sustained commitment. Abstraction emerges through this framework as an act of faith. To begin a painting without knowing its final form is to trust that meaning will surface through repetition and attention. At a certain moment, that commitment required stepping away from exhibition altogether, allowing the work to evolve privately before returning to public view. Rather than presenting artistic growth as clarity or mastery, Sylvester describes a practice built through persistence, where rigor, vulnerability, and belief remain inseparable. He explains: • Why daily rituals and discipline are foundational to sustaining a studio practice.• How fatherhood reshaped his relationship to time, responsibility, and ambition.• Why abstraction functions as an act of faith rather than a stylistic choice.• What it meant to withdraw from the exhibition to deepen the work in private.• How travel and research expanded the historical resonance of the work. Timestamps (0:00) Ritual and the Structure of Practice(5:00) Fatherhood and Responsibility(11:00) Abstraction and Faith(18:00) Stepping Away from Exhibition(26:00) Discipline and Repetition(34:00) Cutting into Surface: The Gates(41:00) Travel, History, and Material Memory(49:00) Persistence and Staying in the Work Watch the conversationView the full episode on YouTube [https://youtu.be/0HAmvQn6m-w]. Follow Reginald Instagram: @reginaldsylvester2 [https://www.instagram.com/reginaldsylvester2/] Follow Maximillian William Web: https://www.maximillianwilliam.com Instagram: @maximillian_william [https://www.instagram.com/maximillian_william/] Reginald Sylvester II (b. Jacksonville, NC, USA, 1987; lives and works in Jersey City, NJ) creates large-scale paintings and sculptures that trace the generative threshold between the two mediums. Working predominantly in abstraction, he expands the language of his painting practice by incorporating materials such as rubber, tarp, aluminium and steel. His singular approach lends his paintings a sculptural presence and imbues his sculptures with a painter’s sensibility. While grounded in traditional painting techniques, Sylvester II ventures beyond the conventions of stretched canvas, working on surfaces that both absorb and reject paint. His layered, often multi-partite works investigate the language of his chosen mediums: stretcher bars are left exposed, becoming part of his compositions, while oxidised and patinated metal surfaces evoke the histories of gestural painting. Sylvester II also transcends the surface, creating monumental sculptures that reference forms observed through painting and from his environment. The artist is drawn to materials that relate to his personal history, spirituality, or broader societal narratives. In his approach to assemblage, Sylvester II appropriates byproducts of his making process, physically attaching studio debris to works to enrich their tactile quality and textural narrative. About The Forum The Forum is NewCrits’ ongoing public talk series, presented in partnership with WSA/WSBS. Talks take place live every second Tuesday at WSA. Join us for our next conversation here [https://www.newcrits.studio/events]. Explore NewCrits’ offerings, including crits, courses, and mentorship programs at www.newcrits.studio [http://www.newcrits.studio]. — Full Transcript Ajay Kurian: I’m gonna start off with the big questions, things that are really important to people. You are 37 years old. What the fuck is your skincare routine man? Reginald Sylvester ll: 39. Ajay Kurian: That’s insane. Reginald Sylvester ll: Knocking on 40, bro. Ajay Kurian: Oh my God. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah, man. Cold water and shots out to mom Dukes. Ajay Kurian: That’s really Mom Dukes and cold water. I remember this very clearly when Pharrell was asked, he said cold water too. Reginald Sylvester ll: He’s right. Closes up your pores, but, yeah 39, about to be 40. Ajay Kurian: And you’re a new father. Reginald Sylvester ll: And I’m a new father. Ajay Kurian: Congratulations. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah, man. Ajay Kurian: What’s family life right now? How do you do studio, father, all of the things? Reginald Sylvester ll: To be honest, it’s not much studio. It is just really wifey, Noah, supporting her, you know. She’s still getting back to a hundred percent and so I’m just support right now. I’m the calvary. Keeping it down. I fit in drawing, some reading when I can, but for the most part, I’m waking up, and it’s, what do you need, what you need help with, what does Noah need, and you need a break. I’m just support, you know, at this point. Ajay Kurian: That’s good. Reginald Sylvester ll: But the time away is gonna help the practice. Ajay Kurian: Yeah. I think it always fuels it. Even if you’re not in the studio, other things are happening and you just brought life into the world. Your lovely wife brought life into the world. So how could that not affect? I was thinking about you having a kid and what that means for the studio practice, but also what that means for how you share your spiritual practice with the next generation, with your kin, and how that’s meant a lot to you. Is church a part of your life or is it a different kind of spiritual practice? How are you gonna pass this on? Reginald Sylvester ll: I grew up with my grandma going to the church. You know, that was how I grew up. But obviously as we grow and become adults, you start seeking after things on your own. So I’m just in big research mode right now. I’m just doing a lot of reading, a lot of research, things that feel true, and things that I stray away from. But I’m in a big learning research, discovery mode, lots of conversations with my pops, my mom. Ajay Kurian: And they’re open to those kinds of conversations? Because I know for myself, my parents are from Kerala, and there’s a huge Christian population there. So I grew up Christian and they’re very religious. And I thought learning about theology and the history of Christianity and all that stuff would build a bridge. It did not. It was like it created more hostility in a way because it’s like, why do you have all these questions? Why are you inquiring? What are the bridges that you have with your folks? Reginald Sylvester ll: So my dad, he went to theology school to become a pastor at a certain point. He’s done a lot of research and reading and so forth in his own life. And so when I come to him with questions, he’s very open arms, answering those questions, and guiding me with the questions. Sometimes, parents can be very opinionated, you know, that’s not what you know, that’s what we should be looking at is this soul. But it’s great because I think in terms of spirituality, for me, I just wanna get to the truth. That’s what it’s really about. And I think, through becoming an artist. Art is a thing that deals with truth. So once I made the decision to actually become an artist, it made me question a lot of things about, where I am, who I am, where I come from, you know what I’m saying? What do I believe? So I started to become a student of history and really just started to do a lot of reading, and then again, going back to my folks asking questions, did you hear about this? What do you think about this? Ajay Kurian: That’s beautiful. It’s nice that you have that relationship with your family. I mean, it seems like they’re all kind of artists in their own way too. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah. My dad, I guess I call ‘em like an artist and graphic designer. Growing up, I seen him do a lot of things with typography. Not really painting, but more so graphics. He did t-shirts, which is what led me to falling into streetwear, watching him kind of having a brand and doing his thing. Ajay Kurian: Oh, he had a brand logo? Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah, I mean, Pops made shirts. But just seeing him kind of move like that gave me the confidence to wanna be a graphic designer or want to learn about typography or wanna learn about silk screening t-shirts. He was a big part of that. Ajay Kurian: I wanna start with Limbo first. This is a quote that hit me really hard just ‘cause it’s a heavy thing to say. You said ‘making that connection between abstraction and faith grabbed hold of me. Suddenly for me to paint or find an image became symbolic of how one lives life, with hopes of dying to then enter into the kingdom of heaven’. That’s a heavy ass thing to say. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah, I guess I didn’t mean it to be so deep or sound so heavy. Ajay Kurian: What is the Kingdom of Heaven for you? What is that? Reginald Sylvester ll: Kingdom of Heaven is to be with God, to be with Christ, to make it to paradise or spiritual paradise and how I attested that to painting. When I first came to New York for my second business trip in my graphic design days, I wasn’t concerned about being an abstract painter at all. But I ended up going to the Met and went to the abstract expressionist wing. First time with De Kooning, Gilliam, you name it — the guys, right? And I immediately felt like this is something I want to do. But I don’t know how I’m gonna get there. When I did start to research and read, I learned about De Kooning and him talking about finding an image, and it very much sounded like a painterly way of faith. Or how one goes through life, living life. We all try and I don’t know if people are religious or believe in God or heaven or after life or whatever, but we all live life the best we can in order to make it to that next place where our soul will rest, you know? He talked about finding an image and it made that connection for me. So I said, if I’m gonna be any type of painter, it would be an abstract painter. Because it was like a painterly motif that defined faith, or how I sought and see faith. ‘Cause faith is believing in things unseen, right? Ajay Kurian: For sure. Reginald Sylvester ll: And so if you’re in the process of making a painting, but you don’t necessarily know what that finished image is, but you’re working your way through it, that’s what that thing is. And so, I don’t know what the Kingdom of Heaven looks like. It’s been described in a few ways, but I hope to get there, you know? So to get to that finished painting, I don’t wanna say perfect painting, but the act of making to find my way to new images is what made that connection for me. Ajay Kurian: I remember I had to write something about On Kawara back in the day. And weirdly, after spending more and more time with the work, it felt like it was a practice of prayer. That every painting was a small act of devotion towards something unnameable. It didn’t have a shape or a way of being described, but you put in the work. It felt similarly related to thinking about what all this means here for somewhere else. It feels like that’s kind of the starting point for these 12 gates that are in Accra right now. How did this all come about? First of all, this space is fucking stunning. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah, shout out to Limbo, man. That’s Dominique and the homie Diallo. Diallo suggested me to Dominique, who runs the Limbo Museum. Very forward-thinking in terms of the vision. But it’s a museum that basically uses abandoned spaces in order to give artists an opportunity to put together shows. They’ve started a residency program and I was the first artist to do the residency. Initially, when I went to go visit for the first trip, I thought we were gonna use the space that they used for the prior presentation when they did the inaugural talk and show. And she was like, no, I’m just taking you here to just show you the initial space, but this is the idea that I have for you. So she went to the University of Ghana, and I was like, you are gonna let me do a show and this is what we’re doing? She was like, yeah, and it was great because it was my first time on the continent and I’ve always wanted to do a show on the continent. My father always talked about taking the family to the continent. Obviously I wanna touch roots. You know what I’m saying? Ajay Kurian: Yeah. Reginald Sylvester ll: But then it was also challenging ‘cause I’d never worked at this scale before. How are you gonna treat this space? How is the work gonna function in this space? How is it gonna reverberate in the space? Diallo and myself had a lot of conversations surrounding that and he challenged me on a lot of things in terms of these gates from their initial intent and how they were shown. How to move past that and to allow them to do other things. And so, this allowed me the space to do so. Ajay Kurian: The first time you showed them was in LA . I just wanna show images of that exhibition, which had a great title, T-1000. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yep, I’m sure everybody’s familiar with Terminator. Ajay Kurian: Yeah, Terminator 2: Judgment Day. Reginald Sylvester ll: I’m super big into sci-fi movies that got that post-apocalyptic punk undertone. You know, brutalist, kind of futurist. Ajay Kurian: I mean, it shows. The work is definitely in that vibe and I remember when I was researching you, that I saw this show. But I do remember when you were fabricating those gates and I was checking the progress on Instagram, and I was like, shit, this is different. This isn’t a new step. Reginald Sylvester ll: Finding my way through making new types of paintings led me to sculpture. I’m a fan of painting first and being interested as a maker, you’re always trying to figure out, how can I push the work? How can I find myself? If I’m interested in sculpture, how do I find my way there? Being introduced to a new material, which is rubber, led me to really changing the whole process and way I make work. That led me to a form that was found by way of the byproducts of the paintings, which gave way to the gates. And so that’s the cutting that you see in the rubber. Because at one point I was researching and reading a lot about ready-made sculptures. I started to think about my paintings in the sense of a ready-made and how I can show all parts or all aspects of the painting. Making this curvature incision, and the shape that I was left with when it was laid on the floor in my studio reminded me of the floor plans used for the boats that were used in the transatlantic slave trade. Ajay Kurian: That’s interesting to hear. I always thought it was the other way around. I thought that you had that shape in mind and then that curvature got cut and it became that act of violence in the surface. But it’s interesting to hear that it was first a formal decision. One where it was like, let’s get to the truth of the material. Reginald Sylvester ll: The thought of even showing the substrate. I think that’s why I wanna continue to put myself in new situations in the studio. Because for me, and every artist is different, but that’s the way that I grow. So if the aesthetic of a material interests me, it’s for me to not really ask too many questions. It’s just to respond to it. So I was using a lot of military tent shell halves, they’re called pup tents. You basically button two of the tent halves together to make a full tent. I was buttoning them together to stretch them over the substrate, but because they don’t make a complete closure, you get access to the substrate. I thought, oh, I can be more intentional about that. This is happening by way of accident. I made a series of paintings with the pup tents, but I said, how am I gonna be more intentional about this access to revealing the substrate and how it changes the form and the structure of my work. The reason why I called them Gates, because thinking about that history along that journey. I mean, we’ve seen Amistad films, so how do I take this history and reverberate it into something, I don’t wanna say beautiful, but speak further into it. Ajay Kurian: It feels like the history of black culture in so many ways where it’s like you take shitty situations that are beyond the pale, and then you consistently make joy out of it. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yes. I think some of the best work is made from the most mundane things. I think that’s black and brown folk in general. We take a lot of the waste and cook and repurpose it into something great. Reginald Sylvester ll: And so I said, all those bodies that were lost along that journey, where do those souls lie? Scripture say that all souls return to the father once they pass. But I just thought that, maybe I can take this shape and I can reform it as this gate-like sculpture in order to give way for those souls to pass through, to have rest. Ajay Kurian: So in that early version, that’s sheet metal welded together and it has a structure underneath, but then this becomes airy and light. What does that translation mean for you? What does it mean to take it to this place of pure structure? Reginald Sylvester ll: A big part of my work and how I continue to try and grow, is I’m just paying attention to what interests me. I used to have a studio out in Ridgewood and I would look at a lot of the debris. The junk by the trash cans, the back of semi-trucks and how they oxidize over time, the environment of the city, the outside. And using that as a language to bring into the studio. So I did the same thing when I went to Ghana. Ghana’s a very interesting place because it excited me, but it also made me really upset. Because you see wealth and poverty right next to each other. You go to a hotel that’s around the corner from people who don’t even have clean water. You know what I’m saying? Ajay Kurian: That feels like Mumbai too. I remember going there and there’s like Prada on one side, and then this dude with his hands disintegrating from leprosy. It is so stark. Where I’m from, in the south, it’s still communist, and the discrepancy in wealth is much less extreme. But there’s certain places in various parts of the world where the jump is so crazy that it really fucks with you. Reginald Sylvester ll: And just getting a grasp on, why is this happening? So from my understanding of what they were telling me, when new individuals were elected or coming into power, certain buildings that had paperwork and had the okay to go forward — build this hotel, build up this certain area, build up these certain advertisements — if that project wasn’t complete by the time that individual who gave way for it to happen, the next person that came into power can say yay or nay on whether it’s finished or not. Which initially gave Dominique the idea for Limbo, right? Because you’re seeing all these great infrastructures half built and then the people that are living there have to deal with it. Anyway, getting to the language within the gates here, it was by way of seeing the advertisement signs and the structures that were exposed. It’s funny, I see Eric Mack in the back, my bro, and I thought about ‘em a lot. I told Dominique to reach out to Eric, because you would see a lot of torn away signages breezing in the wind. I was just thinking about the structure of these gates and the call or need for tension. You know, not as this solid form, but as this form that your eyes can kind of pass through. And then thinking about the space that they’re about to be exhibited in. It’s a very raw skeletal space. So I want the works to have this presence, where they’re there, but they also evaporate. Even these sight lines were very important for us because I want your eye to rest on the sculpture, but I also want your eye to be able to pass through the structure and just enjoy the space as well too. You have sculpture after sculpture that reveals a painting in the distance. So that was another reason why I wanted to stick to this thing and also just thinking about radical black empowerment or thinking about Nkrumah. Thinking about his influence on W-B-W-E-B, du Bois, Malcolm X, all these individuals who I look up to, and have read about and thinking about. The writings, the fortitude and resilience they had, and how maybe these forms can give way for those teachings and those hopes for the continent or those from the diaspora. For those that kind of echo throughout these works as well. Ajay Kurian: I’m not familiar with, you said Nkrumah? Reginald Sylvester ll: He was a revolutionary that really wanted to unite all of Africa. While he was living and was active, he had a huge influence on a lot of American activists as well. Malcolm X was somebody he really influenced. Ajay Kurian: I gotta do some reading. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah, so that first trip was very visual and the latter end was very like, I’m looking, I’m reading, I’m writing. Then the second trip was going to work. Ajay Kurian: It’s beautiful that you find the vernacular of the city, the tubing, and it sits in the space but it takes you somewhere else. It’s like it’s building on all these conversations that you’ve already been having. It really makes me think how far you’ve come in this crazy way where you started in graphic design, typology, and working in streetwear. To go from that to this. It’s not insane or anything, but it’s a pretty serious distance in terms of what that work looked like and where you are now. Your first show is In Search of a Wonderful Place. It’s very obviously condo inspired. Reginald Sylvester ll: Heavily. Ajay Kurian: Heavily. You’re bringing your own things to it, but it’s also within this space of what I’ve seen a few times over. Of people who are in streetwear and the artists that they’re interested in are all the same artists, which are Condo, KAWS, and Picasso Reginald Sylvester ll: Murakami. Ajay Kurian: Murakami. Also, let’s not forget Basquiat and Warhol. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yep. Ajay Kurian: Those are the names. And it’s an instance in which we get to see an artist process it live. You’re doing it in exhibitions, not in the studio. There are people that are figuring their shit out and they get their opportunities much later. But one thing that is a credit to you is you are always adept at what you were doing, and somebody saw some promise there and then you kept pushing it forward. So to go from this to deep gestural abstraction is already a huge jump. Why did you forsake this? Reginald Sylvester ll: This is when I moved to New York, but prior was that trip to the Met. I was aware of the Met, but I didn’t have the studio time, nor the hand and eye coordination to even make a pure gestural, abstract painting. But that’s why I named this show In Search of a Wonderful Place. I don’t know if I’m at the wonderful place now, but you know, this was me making the work that I was interested in at that time. And also titling the show in a way where I could have definitely stayed there, but I’m in search of something. Ajay Kurian: When did this place stop being wonderful? Reginald Sylvester ll: I mean, it was funny when we were talking the other day. I was going back on our conversation and the beautiful thing for me about art is that it’ll let you know if your intent is pure. My intention behind all the different bodies of work that I made, was always pure. It was to push as hard as I could at that particular time. But at the end of the day, art is gonna push you to truth if you’re really doing it for real. If your intent is to really make the purest work that you could possibly make, it’ll pull out all the lies. It’ll pull out all the fake shit. It’ll make you question. I’d make work, and then I’d ask myself, why is this work relevant to you and who you are? What aesthetic interest does it have to you? What more do you have to say? I would ask myself these questions, and then at the same time, I’m seeing retrospectives for the first time, I’m traveling, I’m buying books, I’m learning about this, that, and the third, there’s a cannon. I’m educating myself at the same time, but I never thought, not until after this show, I made the decision that I wanna just take two years off. Ajay Kurian: Oh, wow. Reginald Sylvester ll: And just be in the studio and really push as hard as I can in order to make my first presentation of abstract paintings. But, you know, before that, it wasn’t a fear for me to be growing and developing in front of people. I just thought, you know, I’m making work. You saw the last show that I’m doing and I’m progressing. Also, I think a lot of my favorite shows were retrospective. So I would see an accumulation of an artist’s life within one exhibition, so I never really thought about it in a scary way. But after this show I said, yo, I really want my next presentation to be pure abstractions. Ajay Kurian: Interesting. I had never seen the show, so I had to do some digging. For one, it’s crazy that it’s at the Lever House. That’s no small thing. And two, was Richard Prince on your mind at all? Because it was really fascinating that I could see Matisse, Picasso, Basquiat, but also you pushing it into a different place. It did feel like, okay, I see a voice here. It doesn’t feel like it’s just pulling from these things and kind of chopping it up differently. So I was trying to find the show, and this felt really reminiscent, but this was a year later and he hadn’t made this work yet. It was an interesting thing to see that this gestural, sort of semi figurative abstraction was something that he returned to. But the difference to me is that with Richard Prince, there’s always this irony. There’s a built in sense of he believes it and he doesn’t at the same time. In a sense, there was a moment, when I was coming up, there was a moment in painting where everything about abstract expressionism was questioned. Is there such a thing as a pure mark? Is there such a thing as pure subjectivity? Or is it always filtered through ideology or economics or whatever it may be? There are artists that are thinking about that, like Cheyney Thompson trying to break down what the mark means. Wade Guyton taking the hand out of it altogether. Reginald Sylvester ll: I was watching Wade. Ajay Kurian: What’s your relationship to an artist like Wade Guyton? Reginald Sylvester ll: Aesthetically he speaks to stuff that I’m interested in. To me, this is futurist painting. But I come from graphic design, so the fact that he’s using the Epson printer, you know, I very much so understand Epson in printmaking in that way. His book practice is really incredible. I’ve learned from buying tons of books. I’m very interested in making my own books. I’ve been lucky enough to make a few, so I’m interested in him in that way. Prince, I’m also interested in, because he’s also an artist who has done different things. It’s funny that you say that work came a year after, but during Premonition I was heavily invested in that work. That’s where I was heavily invested at that time. Ajay Kurian: So we met in 2021. I feel like I started hearing your name and I started seeing the work and the thing that captured me the most was your presence, and the way that you are in the world. I was like, okay, that person has like an energy that radiates in a very specific way. And so I was like, I know they’re cooking, I know something’s happening there. What I’m curious about, in a moment like that, where you’re shifting so many things in yourself that you’re very clear about. What does that look like to other people? Like from where you come from to that particular moment? How does that environment start to change for you? Reginald Sylvester ll: I used to get all types of remarks from homies, from people that would meet me. I remember I mentioned to you when we were talking about what people are thinking about the work. I hope they think that my intentions are pure when I’m making this work. I hope nobody thinks I’m just trying to, oh, this might work. Nah, man. I’m gonna go back to that first thing and then continue to unpack the things that I’m seeing and reading about and watching in terms of art. I was motivated to and I want to have a rigorous studio practice. I want to continue to pay attention to the things that are working within the work that may not be working. Expand on those things and then continue to push. Just for myself, so I can sleep at night. At the end of the day I need to make the work that I’m the most happy about before anybody else has anything to say, and that’s why I made the decision to take two years off. I’m gonna dig deep. I’m gonna make the best abstract paintings that I can possibly make. You know? And that’s what I did. From that, I learned so much. I continue to do that in the studio today. If I’m making work, and there’s a small thing about the painting that I just finished. I’m expanding on it. What started to happen is, I was starting to reference myself in things that were working within the studio to expand on, opposed to maybe continuing to look outward or how am I gonna situate myself in the cannon? Or where do I fit? What do I contribute? And more so I just started thinking very insular about what my real interests are. That’s when the best work started to come or the work that I feel the most proud of. Ajay Kurian: And of course being able to sleep at night is a serious thing. That’s an important way to live your life. It keeps truth in you, but there’s also just economic realities too, if you had success with one particular body of work. Did you get pushback from people in that regard too? Like I see that you’re going this way, but this isn’t what we asked for? Reginald Sylvester ll: No, I didn’t really get pushback in that way. I think it was more, certain individuals or friends or whatnot would always kind of say that you are losing your previous audience. I would see on social media that I’d lose followers. Stuff like that, you know? But when you really sit with yourself, does that really mean anything? You know, again, art would beg the question of what’s true, what’s truth? Visually, what’s the closest to truth you can get for yourself. I mean, those things definitely in some way bother me. I’m not gonna say that they did not, but you know, I look back and I’m glad I kept continuing to have that kind of interest into pushing. Ajay Kurian: I mean, I’m glad too. But the other thing that comes to mind is the kind of racial dynamic here. Did people feel like, and did you feel like, you were moving from black space to white space? Reginald Sylvester ll: Nah, nah. I didn’t feel like that, but I probably got that from other people. Ajay Kurian: I’m not saying that abstraction is a white space. Of course, it goes back further in black and brown places. Reginald Sylvester ll: Than anywhere else, yeah. I think to an audience that raised me up and held me up. You know, coming from street wear, coming from culture in that way, I had a clothing brand, I had built an audience from that. Then my interests started to change and my, I call it maybe a calling, started to change and I really wanted to pursue art and try to make the strongest bodies of work that I could possibly make. I did lose people in that way. I remember, I had a homegirl tell me, she said something on the lines of, I don’t know what this work is about. I mean, from an aesthetic standpoint, you might not be understanding. But abstract painting and art history has layers to it. It’s not just the pictorial thing. But it’s funny now, a lot of those people are — Ajay Kurian: Coming around. Reginald Sylvester ll: Coming around, you know, because again, it’s a journey. Ajay Kurian: You’re very intentional about your movement. It’s not Ooh, let me jump on this, or, Ooh, let me do that. Reginald Sylvester ll: I mean, I could have stayed where I was at in 2021. I could have maybe stayed where I was in 2023. But it’s not what it’s about and there’s growing pains. For me, better things have gotten tougher. Ajay Kurian: I believe that. Reginald Sylvester ll: I’m just moved by evolving and growing and digging deeper and digging into what excites me in the studio. If there’s something that excites me in the studio, I’m going that way. You know, the show that I had in North Carolina at the Harvey B. Gantt Center was a great exhibition for me. I got that show, and I was making the refuge paintings. They were all basically gestural abstract paintings on the pup tents, and then came the offering paintings. And when I made that first offering, I said, the hell with those refuge paintings, I’m showing straight, offering paintings. To be in the middle of a situation where someone gives you a show, and you’re expected to make this thing, but you got this other thing. Luckily, I work with people that believe in what I’m doing and trust me. You know, had the real conversation, sat down, this is the work that I’m making. This is what I wanna do. Maybe I can find a way to bridge it, you know? And luckily, I was able to really think through and find a way to show and stitch together. That first image that you had up, that was the first time I was able to show those paintings. And you know, I’m always gonna make the shift, even with T-1000. I decided to use iridescent dark colors because I felt like, hey, I wanna be a stronger colorist. How am I gonna do that? Okay, instead of just working with colors that complement one another, you need to actually be able to work with a set few colors or one color. You need to be able to make paintings with the same amount of intensity that you would get from a saturated picture, but with a muted picture, how can you do that? So I said, okay, I’m gonna make these paintings and obviously there was an interest in sculpture and steel and the oxidization and all those things, and I made the decision to do it. You know, thinking on the other side of it with my first show in Los Angeles. Rob Bennett gave me this opportunity to have this exhibition and it’s very risky to go and do a show like that. But again, he was like, this is what you wanna do, okay, bet. There’s a Nina Simone clip that I see often and I reposted it. She’s saying that artists should be reflecting the times, you know? So I was like, yo, this is where I’m at in the studio and I’m seeing where things are going in our current and this is the way for me to tell truth. Ajay Kurian: Yeah. It feels like the way you’re talking about challenging yourself, it felt very mamba mentality. This is what I think I’m strong at. Let me see the weakest part of that, so I can figure out how to get strong there. That’s an ethic that’s not easy to put on yourself. I think when you’re in school or when you have people that are around you that are like, oh, you gotta push yourself, you gotta do these things. But when you’re alone and by yourself, and the temptations that are around you, where it’s oh, you’re getting all this praise and accolades and things for doing things in a certain way. You can get seduced by that and it stops being about the pursuit of what you find to be strong and true, but more so, all right, this works. Because there’s also very real world constraints where I could maybe put a down payment on a house if I stay on this course, versus who the fuck knows what it’s gonna be. Reginald Sylvester ll: Yeah. At a point I reached out to a few artists that I was lucky to be able to meet, who have been doing it longer than I have, that are a generation or two older than me. I actually was asking those questions like, I wanna do this, this is the work that I’m making, people like this stuff. Do both. If this is what’s working, pump that, and then that can support the other stuff. I was like, okay. I heard that a few times from a few people. But then it’s on you. You also have artists who don’t have the exposure at the age I’m at. I got an opportunity to meet William T. Williams, you know, a goat. And he’d been banging the boards way far longer than I have. Ajay Kurian: Yeah. Reginald Sylvester ll: I got to go to him. Funny enough, the foundry that I used to make the gates at — I had been using that foundry for a year, not knowing that I was driving past his crib the whole time. Ajay Kurian: No way. Reginald Sylvester ll: So he was like, yeah, this is my address. I’m like, this is literally 10 minutes down the road from where I’m making these gates. Ajay Kurian: God damn. Wow. Reginald Sylvester ll: So I went to go see him and his studio. Met his lovely wife and we had sandwiches. It was great. It was fire. I just saw how dialed in he was at the age that he was, but then thinking again on how long he’s been doing it. So even for me to have opportunities since 2015 till now and to be able to continue to show work, whether it was considered valid or not. Still have opportunities to show work, have people that still wanna back you, believe in the work, help fight. When I get into those thoughts, what do I really got to complain about? There’s artists that have become stewards in a way, where they’re teachers and they support their practice by working. They’re doing that and then still dialed in on the practice. When I do get into those moments, I look at the peers that I really see who’s pushing and enjoy it, and I look at them and I’m like, dang, they doubling down. Fuck, I can’t not double down. I gotta double down. There’s great artists making within the same time that I’m making that I also am inspired by. I’m not gonna say it’s easy. I have my moments. The person that probably sees those moments a lot now is my wife. Of course. She’s like oh, you’re being on your Edgar Allen Poe, you is all mopey today. But that’s the journey though. Jack Whitten said it the best. They asked him, did he ever want to be one of the best artists, and he said, I just wanted to be one of the boys. And that was fucking legendary. I think for me, that’s if Jannis Kounellis, Gilliam, Hammonds, Ed Ruscha — If any of these guys were in the room, you know what I’m saying? Ajay Kurian: And they tipped their hat. Reginald Sylvester ll: I’d rather go out swinging than to just be like, you know what, this works and I’m gonna sell a hundred thousand of these. But then, what? Ajay Kurian: I mean, the punches are landing my friend. So I hope they keep landing. Reginald Sylvester ll: Lord willing. Ajay Kurian: I’m excited to see what transformations happen next. Thank you for this. Thanks for being honest. Thanks for opening up. Thanks for sharing everything. It means a lot to everybody here, so thank you. Reginald Sylvester ll: Thank you. Thanks for having me. Get full access to NewCrits Substack at newcrits.substack.com/subscribe [https://newcrits.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af The NewCrits Podcast-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

21 episoder

episode SPENT: Episode Three | Whitney Mallet cover

SPENT: Episode Three | Whitney Mallet

SPENT: Episode Three | Whitney Mallet Whitney Mallet has spent years moving through magazines, galleries, performances, readings, and the shifting ecosystems that surround contemporary culture - not as an observer standing outside of it, but as someone committed to paying attention. In this conversation, Whitney sits down with Ajay Kurian to talk about criticism, instinct, and what it means to build a practice around curiosity. They discuss magazines as art projects, the lag between cultural change and cultural criticism, and why making connections between unlikely people, scenes, and ideas can create something more exciting than simply reinforcing what already exists. Whitney reflects on developing taste, not as something fixed or innate, but as something shaped through obsession, attention, and years of showing up. They talk about influence, authority, and the slow process of learning to trust your own perspective. Throughout the conversation, Whitney returns to a tension that runs through both criticism and creative work: the pull between analysis and instinct, busyness and reflection, skepticism and hope. What emerges isn’t a defense of optimism so much as a practice of remaining open. Believing that culture can still surprise you, that intensity is worth pursuing, and that staying curious might be one way of resisting disappointment. Hosted by Ajay KurianEdited by Peter GroppeProduced by NewCrits  The Whitney Review of New Writing:   https://www.whitneyreview.org/ [https://www.whitneyreview.org/] 00:00 — Intro 04:50 — Running a Magazine by Instinct 09:20 — Taste, Influence, and Learning What You Like 15:10 — Building Unexpected Encounters 20:30 — Trusting Your Own Authority 27:15 — Information, Obsession, and Developing Taste 33:40 — Work as Practice 38:20 — Edging Burnout 43:45 — Busyness, Avoidance, and Personal Writing 49:30 — Disappointment, Intensity, and Staying Optimistic 55:15 — Criticism, Attention, and Cultural Delay 1:01:20 — The Internet, Institutions, and the Changing Role of Reviews 1:07:15 — Writing Without Permission 1:11:40 — Earnestness, Cynicism, and Seeing Through Things 1:16:20 — Breakthrough or Burnout 1:18:00 — Outro Get full access to NewCrits Substack at newcrits.substack.com/subscribe [https://newcrits.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

18. juni 202656 min
episode SPENT: Episode Two | Walter Price cover

SPENT: Episode Two | Walter Price

SPENT: Episode Two | Walter Price Walter Price’s paintings may present as loose, instinctive, and immediate, but behind them is a practice built on discipline, repetition, and consistency.  In this conversation, Walter sits down with Ajay Kurian to talk about building a life around making work and what it means to remain committed to the process. Together they discuss ambition, routine, competition, and the challenge of continuing to evolve without becoming attached to outcomes. Walter reflects on making small paintings when everyone told him to scale up, embracing experimentation over certainty, and treating limitations as opportunities rather than obstacles. Again and again, he returns to the same idea: growth comes from pushing toward discomfort instead of away from it. Walter describes creativity as something active - a practice of showing up, staying curious, and refusing to get comfortable. At one point, Walter says he doesn’t want the cheers. He wants the boos. Not because he’s interested in proving people wrong, but because he understands what keeps him moving: there is always another level to reach. Hosted by Ajay KurianEdited by Peter GroppeProduced by NewCrits  More about Walter Price: https://www.davidzwirner.com/artists/walter-price [https://www.davidzwirner.com/artists/walter-price] 00:00 — Intro 04:15 — Growing Up 08:40 — Early Ideas About Becoming an Artist 13:25 — Consistency vs Inspiration 18:50 — Small Paintings and Ignoring Expectations 24:30 — Wanting the Boos, Not the Cheers 29:15 — Ambition, Restlessness, and Staying Hungry 34:10 — Experimentation as Practice 39:20 — Developing Taste and Trusting Instinct 44:45 — Limitations as Opportunity 49:30 — Growth Through Discomfort 55:10 — Routine, Repetition, and Showing Up 1:00:45 — Success, Satisfaction, and What Comes Next 1:06:20 — Curiosity as a Long-Term Practice 1:10:00 — Outro Get full access to NewCrits Substack at newcrits.substack.com/subscribe [https://newcrits.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

18. juni 20261 h 17 min
episode SPENT: Episode One | Yaya Bey cover

SPENT: Episode One | Yaya Bey

SPENT: Episode One | Yaya Bey Yaya Bey has built one of the most singular voices in contemporary music not by chasing consensus, but by trusting her own sense of practice. Across albums that move through R&B, house, soul, poetry, and memory, their work resists easy categorization - and she’s increasingly uninterested in trying to make it legible to people who insist on misunderstanding it. In this conversation, recorded ahead of the release of her new album Fidelity, Yaya sits down with Ajay Kurian for a wide-ranging discussion about what it means to make work on your own terms while navigating an industry that often wants to flatten artists into narratives that are easier to sell. Yaya speaks candidly about the limits of criticism, who gets positioned as the authority to interpret Black art, and what happens when audiences project meaning onto work instead of listening to what the artist is actually saying. Devotion to making music. Devotion to curiosity. Devotion to continuing even when the systems around you are exploitative, unstable, or actively discouraging. Yaya Bey talks openly about the realities of being a working musician - record deals, touring economics, budgets, labels, expectations, and the invisible labor that exists behind an artist’s public life. What emerges isn’t cynicism, but a kind of grounded determination: a belief that creativity survives because people keep making things anyway. Yaya describes hope not as optimism but as discipline: if you want to be free, you have to believe freedom is possible even when it feels impossible. Otherwise you begin believing in your own defeat.  Hosted by Ajay KurianEdited by Peter GroppeProduced by NewCrits Yaya’s New Album, Fidelity:  https://yayabey.bandcamp.com/album/fidelity [https://yayabey.bandcamp.com/album/fidelity]  Yaya’s Substack: https://substack.com/@yayabeybay?utm_source=global-search [https://substack.com/@yayabeybay?utm_source=global-search]  Upcoming Show Dates:  https://www.bandsintown.com/a/15521055-yaya-bey?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQPOTM2NjE5NzQzMzkyNDU5AAGn-QGJBp8sdAH4IFe4bEeCmP3lrQR-VKQfb8hkYbMxaEaXsUZ1vfEY29Xw4Yo_aem_swM1Nk76aGvpG-4j_ajAFQ [https://www.bandsintown.com/a/15521055-yaya-bey?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQPOTM2NjE5NzQzMzkyNDU5AAGn-QGJBp8sdAH4IFe4bEeCmP3lrQR-VKQfb8hkYbMxaEaXsUZ1vfEY29Xw4Yo_aem_swM1Nk76aGvpG-4j_ajAFQ] 00:00 — Intro 05:00 — Misreading the Work 08:00 — Who Gets to Interpret Black Art 12:35 — Grief, Joy, and Refusing the Assigned Story 15:45 — Being Polarizing / Being Protected 19:00 — The Politics of Interpretation 23:40 — Grief Beyond the Self 27:35 — Refusing Other People’s Narratives 35:20 — The Industry, Capital, and Finding Your People 41:30 — Discomfort as a Teacher 48:40 — Community, Poetry, and Becoming an Artist 52:00 — Becoming a Working Musician 57:15 — Loss, Stability, and Living Through Contradiction 1:00:00 — Making a Life, Not Just a Career 1:09:35 — Curiosity as Practice 1:12:30 — Outro Get full access to NewCrits Substack at newcrits.substack.com/subscribe [https://newcrits.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

18. juni 20261 h 13 min
episode The Forum 20 | Kamrooz Aram: Painting on the Edge of Ornament and Abstraction cover

The Forum 20 | Kamrooz Aram: Painting on the Edge of Ornament and Abstraction

He works through form, perception, and the politics of display — Kamrooz Aram on ornament, abstraction, and the unstable ground of how we see. Kamrooz Aram moves between painting, sculpture, and collage, using material, structure, and exhibition design to question how images are read and how histories are constructed. His work often begins in the studio, through process and formal decision-making, and expands outward into larger systems of meaning: how value is assigned, how objects are categorized, and how cultural narratives are embedded within visual form. Across recent exhibitions, he continues to return to questions of ornament, modernism, and the conditions that shape perception without resolving them into fixed positions. He explains: * How openness, curiosity, and “young artist energy” remain essential to sustaining a long-term practice. * Why restraint, stepping away, and not overworking are as critical as mark-making in the studio. * What it means to work within a structure or “mode,” where improvisation can emerge without forcing novelty. * How ornament and abstraction are historically entangled, and why their separation reflects biased art histories. * Why viewers project cultural assumptions onto form, and how ideas of “the decorative” or “the exotic” are constructed. * How value shifts depending on context, authorship, and belief, from museum objects to replicas and everyday materials. * Why art can create moments of transcendence through form, rather than through narrative alone. (00:08) Welcome + Returning to the Studio(04:20) Reclaiming “Young Artist Energy”(10:00) The Nonlinear Life of a Painting(15:30) Disruption, Destruction, and Letting the Work Shift(25:56) Sculpture as an Extension of Painting(28:10) Ornament, Abstraction, and Historical Bias(33:40) Time, Fading, and Letting Go of Control(52:45) Authenticity, Replication, and Constructed Value Watch the conversationView the full episode on YouTube. Follow KamroozWeb: https://kamroozaram.com/ [https://kamroozaram.com/]Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kamroozegar/ [https://www.instagram.com/kamroozegar/] Kamrooz Aram (b. 1978) has built his practice on dismantling the divide between ornament and fine art, renegotiating the art historical hierarchies that privilege Western forms of abstraction above others. His paintings and sculptures do not simply cross categories; they probe the structures that enforce them. Born in Shiraz, Iran, Aram emigrated to the United States in the 1980s, where he found himself forced to come to terms with a multitude of identities imposed upon him. These experiences left a lasting mark. Categories, he discovered, do not merely describe identity—they invent it. This recognition drives his work, which asserts that non-Western ornamental traditions carry the same intellectual weight and conceptual rigor Western art history has long reserved for itself. About The ForumThe Forum is NewCrits’ ongoing public talk series, presented in partnership with WSA/WSBS. Talks take place live every second Tuesday at WSA. Join us for our next conversation here [https://www.newcrits.studio/events].Explore NewCrits’ offerings, including crits, courses, and mentorship programs at www.newcrits.studio [http://www.newcrits.studio/].— Full Transcript Get full access to NewCrits Substack at newcrits.substack.com/subscribe [https://newcrits.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

6. maj 20261 h 2 min
episode The Forum 19 | Rachel Rose: Psychic States, Motherhood, and the Moving Image cover

The Forum 19 | Rachel Rose: Psychic States, Motherhood, and the Moving Image

She works through feeling, perception, and narrative — Rachel Rose on interior weather, unstable perspectives, and art as a way to process what cannot be easily named. Rachel Rose moves between film, installation, and painting, using sound, light, and narrative structure to explore how experience is shaped from the inside out. Her work often begins with an emotional register and expands into systems of history, perception, and embodiment. In her recent film The Last Day, she turns inward, tracing the psychological and biological complexities of motherhood, identity, and crisis without resolving them into clear frameworks. She explains: * How personal feeling becomes a starting point for building larger perceptual and narrative systems. * Why motherhood, postpartum depression, and identity loss resist clean cultural narratives. * How sound and light can destabilize reality and reorient one’s relationship to the world. * What it means to make work that stays with ambiguity rather than resolving into message. * How falling in love with characters becomes a method for discovering structure, rather than imposing it. * Why occupying unlikeable or unstable perspectives creates more honest and generative work. * How art can act as a container for experiences that are culturally unspoken or difficult to locate. (00:08) Welcome + Intro(00:31) The Last Day and the Mrs. Dalloway Transposition (01:37) Motherhood, Identity, and the Book Read Twice (03:35) Lake Valley, Saturn Return, and the Invention of Childhood (07:19) Excerpt: Lake Valley (2016) (10:57) Art School, Painting, and the Crisis of Meaning (15:01) Editing as Voice, the First Video, and Finding the Medium (22:34) Transcendent Experiences and the Power of Art Watch the conversationView the full episode on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8pGHKThZ_o&t=6s]. Follow RachelWeb: https://gladstonegallery.com/exhibit/rachel-rose-the-rest/ [https://gladstonegallery.com/exhibit/rachel-rose-the-rest/]Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/worrrld/ [https://www.instagram.com/worrrld/] Rachel Rose (b. 1986) lives and works in New York. The work of Rachel Rose explores how our changing relationship to landscape has shaped storytelling and belief systems. Rose’s films draw from and contribute to the long history of cinematic innovation; whether investigating cryogenics, the American Revolutionary War, or an astronaut’s space walk, Rose directs our attention to sites and histories in which the sublime and the everyday blur. She translates this in her paintings, sculptures and drawings, which materially reverberate with one another, connecting the immediate to deep time. Recent solo exhibitions include: Science Gallery, London, UK (2024); GL STRAND, Copenhagen (2023); SITE Santa Fe, Santa Fe (2023); CC Strombeek, Strombeek (2022); Pond Society, Shanghai (2020); Lafayette Anticipations, Paris (2020); Fridericianum, Kassel (2019); LUMA Foundation, Arles (2019); Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia (2018); Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Turin (2018); Kunsthaus Bregenz, Bregenz (2017); Museu Serralves, Porto (2016); The Aspen Art Museum, Aspen (2016); The Whitney Museum of American Art, New York (2015); Serpentine Gallery, London (2015); Castello di Rivoli, Turin (2015). Recent group exhibitions include: Fondation Beyeler, Basel (2024); ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark (2023); Yuz Museum, Shanghai (2023); Centre d’Art Contemporain Geneva, Geneva (2023); 3rd Jeju Biennale (2022); 9th Beijing Biennale (2022); The Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston (2022); Minneapolis Institute of Art, Minneapolis (2022); Schinkel Pavilion, Berlin (2021); Toledo Museum of Art, Toledo, US (2021); Artspace, Sydney (2021); Art Sonje Center, Seoul (2021); A Tale of A Tub, Tlön Projects, Rotterdam (2021); Power Station of Art, Shanghai (2020); Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2018); Carnegie International, 57th Edition, Pittsburgh (2018); 57th Venice Biennale (2017); 32nd São Paudalo Biennial (2016); Hayward Gallery, London (2016); Okayama Art Summit, Japan (2016). She is the recipient of the Future Fields Award and the Frieze Artist Award. About The ForumThe Forum is NewCrits’ ongoing public talk series, presented in partnership with WSA/WSBS. Talks take place live every second Tuesday at WSA. Join us for our next conversation here [https://www.newcrits.studio/events].Explore NewCrits’ offerings, including crits, courses, and mentorship programs at www.newcrits.studio [http://www.newcrits.studio/]. — Full Transcript Ajay Kurian: Can you tell us a little bit about The Last Day? Rachel Rose: It’s a film that I wrote. Loosely based on Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway. I don’t know how many of you are familiar with the book, but maybe I’ll just summarize the book briefly so that you understand what I did. The book takes place in a day, and it was written after World War I. It describes a bourgeois housewife, Clarissa Dalloway, going about her errands in her day at 50, about to throw a big party for her husband in the evening. She has an 18-year-old daughter that’s kind of separating and rejecting her. There’s a foil character, who’s equally important in the book, named Septimus Smith, who’s a World War I vet who Clarissa sort of passes by. It’s almost like sliding doors throughout the day. He’s suffering from severe PTSD from World War I. Clarissa throws a party and at the end of the day he kills himself. I had read the book in high school and not thought about it much again. I had always been into Virginia Woolf and that was that. And then one day, I have two kids and I was getting our Tesla fixed in Red Hook at the Tesla dealership, and I was texting my friend sitting there in the waiting room. She’s said oh, what a Mrs Dalloway day you’re having. And I was like, oh am I Mrs. Dalloway? Let me think about that. So I read it again and I was completely blown away. As a mother reading it, I now understood the book totally differently than I understood it as a 16-year-old because obviously the perspective and consciousness changes as that’s what Virginia Woolf does. But now I was sitting in Clarissa’s position, obviously I’m not 50 and my kids aren’t 18, but I was feeling her pain, her rudder, her sense of loss of identity, all the kind of acts of self-actualization she had reversed or given up in exchange for her motherhood. I was incredibly moved and so I decided to transpose it into a modern day New York story, and the Septimus character, I transposed into a labor and delivery nurse that was suffering from severe postpartum depression. Ajay Kurian: Oh, wow. Rachel Rose: Which is something that I also suffered from. Ajay Kurian: Yeah. Rachel Rose: So I kind of, in different ways, felt myself in the different characters. Ajay Kurian: So much of what I’ve understood about your work prior to this moment is like larger systems in which humans find themselves in. It feels like this movie is a shift to the internal weather, rather than the external weather. I know it's just a matter of what the focus is. They're all kind of an ouroboros of sorts, but did it feel like a shift? Did you feel like you were going into something more intimate with the film? Rachel Rose: Before making the film and also before having children, so much of my experience in making works was a combination of I’m feeling this thing. For example, I’m feeling really anxious. Could I attach it? Now of course there’s all kinds of internal reasons why I might be feeling anxiety, nothing to do with, let’s say the weather or something. Ajay Kurian: Sure. Rachel Rose: But can I attach it to something I’m spotting outside, and make the artwork the container for that connection. So the work was always coming from something that always began with a personal feeling, but the difference is, that you’re right to point out, in this film it doesn’t go beyond that. A guess if you’re talking about motherhood, but the film isn’t a political comment on motherhood structurally in society. It’s actually totally not that. Ajay Kurian: What you’re saying there, there was a moment in an interview, I can’t remember who you were talking to, but you were talking about the process that you go through to make anything. Which is almost like you’re a sensor that’s like feeling things around you. And then as soon as you feel it and kind of know that you’re feeling something that’s worth noticing, that you then almost zoom out to see what the feeling is doing. Rachel Rose: I’ve done it in some really rudimentary, almost stupid ways. Ajay Kurian: I love stupid. Rachel Rose: This film The Last Day, than I made, is me contending with my ambivalence, confusion, pain and ecstasy around being a mother. For me, that’s why I made it. To kind of figure something about that out and give voice to a crisis I feel many other women experience, but there aren’t clear places to put that necessarily. For example, if I think back to when I made Lake Valley when I was 28, that was a work that I made in the beginning of my Saturn return. Actually, it was just the year after I had that Whitney show, and I was beginning this new stage of oh, I’m a working artist now and I have a career and I’m like a grownup. Of course we all become grownups to a certain extent when we’re 18 and we leave home. But then there’s this second thing, which is your Saturn return. Many of us know it, where you experience a new version of adulthood, like what’s this thing gonna look like? So this work came from that. Questioning, what does it mean to turn 28? It sounds so, honestly trivial, but at the time it didn’t feel trivial to me. It felt somehow kind of big. Ajay Kurian: 28. I guess I thought you were older at that time, ’cause there’s so much that’s related to childhood here. Rachel Rose: Yeah. Ajay Kurian: Now it makes sense that it is a reckoning of the idea of leaving childish things behind, but then also those things translating into this, as you’re gonna see in a second, very baroque visual language of all these different ways of storytelling coming together. Before we continue, let’s just play this excerpt. This is an excerpt from Lake Valley from 2016. Rachel Rose: 10 years ago. So weird. Just to give the texture of this, at the time, I found and then scanned tons of early children’s, the kind of early proliferation of children’s books, 18th or early 19th century. That’s what all these textures and the surfacing of everything is made up from that and hand collaging, well on Photoshop, but collaging these layers. Ajay Kurian: And it’s kind of the story of this Rabbit-ish figure that gets lost essentially. Rachel Rose: Yeah. Lives in a suburban housing development and goes into the little tiny greenery right next to the house. But then it turns and imagines it as though it’s this forest, but it’s kind of just a whatever space. Much of this was a kind of return to how childhood is formed, culturally. and that it’s kind of a modern invention. Even the idea of the storybook is so modern, and this coincides with the Industrial revolution. The idea that you sit down and read your kids a book and that there’s an illustrated thing that they look at. This is like a totally recent thing. Ajay Kurian: So that structure that seems part of the scaffolding of this —before that, what was the feeling that started this project? Rachel Rose: Saturn return, becoming an adult, understanding ourselves through a childhood, which is a very recent — super recent idea. I mean, Freud, that’s extremely recent. But even the idea that there’s a separation between childhood and adulthood and that we define ourselves as different is also very recent. So I was questioning, why do I now feel like an adult and I didn’t before? And what does that mean in the history of where we are today? So that was the inception. Ajay Kurian: And then getting into that history takes you into the Industrial Revolution and the foundations of how we start thinking about that separation. Rachel Rose: Yes. And then separately, which is true for all my work, I also always have a thing I wanna learn how to do. “I don’t know how to do this” is to me, an essential project and point of making an artwork. When I complete the work, I might know a little bit more about how to do it. So in this case, I’d never done an animation before. I had no idea how to do it. And actually, I don’t think I had ever written a proper script, because up until this point, the two or three works I had made had been basically essays. This one, because it was an animation, I had to storyboard everything. So I had to write a very clear script. It was actually the first time I ever wrote a script. Ajay Kurian: What did that feel like? Rachel Rose: I mean, I didn’t know what I was doing. So it was that, and then it was the storyboarding, and then it was working on a traditional animation because this is hand drawn. Ajay Kurian: Let’s go back even further. Because you went to art school and you went in for painting. But then you started moving into film, seemingly suddenly. Was it like, I can’t think in this medium anymore? Rachel Rose: Yeah, I mean, I got obliterated in all the crits. Everyone hated on everything I did, and I felt so bad about myself all the time. Which wouldn’t necessarily happen in this. But yeah, I felt so bad about myself all the time and I felt like, why do I have to feel bad about myself for this pointless thing? I don’t think painting’s pointless, but… Ajay Kurian: You have a painting show that’s opening in like a few days? Rachel Rose: I don’t think the painting is pointless, but at the time I felt a major existential crisis, right? And when I say this is pointless, I meant all of art making, start to finish. What am I doing here? I wanna do something meaningful with my life. I want to affect change, I wanna contribute. What can you do in art? Seemingly like nothing. Ajay Kurian: So that was the takeaway. Rachel Rose: Well, no, that’s the crisis that I had at that point. And then I thought, if I became a documentary filmmaker, that could be politically actionable. So then I started learning how to make films immediately, thinking that when I graduated I would try to make my way into the documentary film world. So the best thing I could do is learn all the skills I could in the meantime. Ajay Kurian: Did it come as a shock to your professors at the time? And when you started making that first video piece that you thought was gonna be a documentary — when did you know that it wasn’t? Rachel Rose: I knew it wasn’t when I started editing, but not up until that point. I was driving around shooting this footage and doing these interviews. I didn’t understand how much it wasn’t a documentary film until I started editing, which was the first time I ever edited anything. And I just fell in love with the medium. I felt that this is it, this is me. I’ve been waiting all this time, and I was in the middle of my second to last semester of school at that point. It was like, let’s say November of my last year when I was finally editing. So I was like, oh my God, this is it. I love this medium so much. Ajay Kurian: Did everybody in the crits just shut the fuck up? Rachel Rose: I mean, I wasn’t showing anything at that point because I didn’t have anything to show. I was just working on my project or whatever. Ajay Kurian: But then you had a final piece. Rachel Rose: Yeah, but I guess what I’m saying is I fell so in love with editing. I felt like this is my voice. Ajay Kurian: I mean, that’s when I met you, when you were graduating from graduate school. Rachel Rose: That’s right. That’s when we met, because you were in that show. Ajay Kurian: Yeah, I was in the show that Ian was in, at PS1. Rachel Rose: And I was coming over and bothering you guys during install, I remember that! Ajay Kurian: Yeah. So Rachel’s married to Ian Chang, another artist, they both show at Gladstone. An amazing artist in his own right. And we were in that show together and Rachel was asking for studio visits from everyone. Rachel Rose: Yes. I’m sure I was. And Josh came and changed my life Ajay Kurian: I believe it. To every person you were like, I’d love to show you this. And I was like, wow. I remember seeing it and I was like, this is her first video piece, that’s stupid. It really blew me away. It really towed that line. I hadn’t seen that much video art that felt borderline popular that could have been released in a gallery and it could also be released by Vice. It felt like it had the makings of something that were highly specific and rigorous. And in that particular piece, it was thinking about the border slash limit of life and death. What happens in that transition? How do we codify those things? And seeing it, it really shocked me. You were so proficient in doing this so quickly. It’s obvious that was your voice. It was a no brainer. Rachel Rose: I remember that feeling, I felt high during that period because I felt like after all this time of feeling like I actually wasn’t an artist and like I was wrong and it was time to pivot. Then I found this medium that felt like I could channel myself through it. And at the time, also in the art world, there was a place for making work like that. I think that’s changed now, but at the time there was. Ajay Kurian: I mean, I feel like your rise was in a moment when new media and video was being shown constantly. Now it’s harder to come by exhibitions like that and people that are gonna put the money into it. Because, what you can’t see in this excerpt, is that your videos are installed incredibly specifically. Actually, we can just see it on the website. Did you know that in grad school, was that already something that you were thinking about? Rachel Rose: Yeah, I had this position, I guess at the time, of hanging around in the art world. Which is okay, if I’m gonna do this, if these things are gonna be shown in exhibition spaces and not black boxes, then I should really use the exhibition space for what it can offer. I had screens made out of tapestries and carpets, and all kinds of ways that particularly address the way that the film sat in the space. So yeah, this was at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and we wrapped the room. You can’t see it in these images really, but the room is wrapped in this scrim. The same scrim that we’re projecting on, but it’s double wrapped. So it created this kind of moire effect with the light. And that moire effect was also in the film. So experimenting with things like that. Ajay Kurian: I mean, I guess your first solo exhibition was at the Whitney Museum. And even there, it was the scrim and the way that light was coming through the room. You couldn’t call it site specific, but it was site sensitive. Rachel Rose: It was, that’s exactly the word. I went in and actually edited and played with the blacks in the space. So the idea was that when there was black on the screen, it would be porous because obviously that is a dim projection of light. and you would see the outside world. So I projected a scrim that was in front of a glass. The whole film was about what we can access. And what we can in light and sound is obviously biologically determined, but what does it mean to take our biological form and extract it from this one? Let’s say you become an astronaut or something. What can you see and hear differently? Can you extend the limits of human perceptual capacities, not through drugs or alcohol or whatever else, but through just moving our body into a different environment off of the earth. Ajay Kurian: And what was the thing that you wanted to learn in this piece? Rachel Rose: Well, this piece came out of something really simple actually. I don’t know if it was a thing I wanted to learn, but it was a feeling I wanted to explore, which is that Ian and I had gone to see Gravity in Battery Park City. When we left, we walked home to the Bowery where we lived at the time. I can remember it exactly now, the feeling of leaving the theater and walking on the street and looking at the street signs and the traffic lights. Just like New York City laid bare and feeling actually very alienated from it. And it took that walk, or maybe a few blocks of that walk, to kind of resettle. Actually we never left America. We never left New York City. We were here the whole time. Because I found that film so transportive and seeing it in the theater so transportive, which I think is something to do with the way it was shot and the time and the moment. Then I remember saying to Ian it’s so weird that just sound and light did this to me or to us. That’s all it was. We were just sitting in a black box listening and looking. And yet, a streetlight feels alien to me. So I started to wonder about sound and light and how it enters the body and what it can do to us. Ajay Kurian: And seeing if you could conjure something similar. Rachel Rose: Yes. But first I think I was interested in, what are the extremes of this? Then I heard this interview with this astronaut about a spacewalk he had done in outer space, when he was repairing the International Space Station and the Earth was on the night side. So I guess when the earth is on the night side, the earth is nothing and it just looks black. At least that’s how he described it. Maybe it’s something about the position of the — I can’t remember the details of it, but it was like a void. He described this experience of total blackness in outer space and then what it’s like to come back to earth as an astronaut, which many astronauts have talked about. Having to relearn how to walk, how color is different and sounds feel different. Ajay Kurian: It almost feels like a microcosm of how you think about an artwork in general because there’s something about compression and distortion that happens repeatedly. Where using compression and distortion is a way to unground your viewer and to have them see the world anew again, where there’s something liquid and something destabilizing. You’re using extreme experiences sometimes, but it’s to induce the vertigo of the everyday. Rachel Rose: That’s right, like that image on the screen. Then I got really interested in Douglas Trumbull and early special effects designers from 2001 Space Odyssey and actually how homegrown and simple these effects were. Like that’s just milk and ink, and learning how simply you can suggest something. Ajay Kurian: So there’s just a lot of liquids that Rachel was mixing together, and when you see them, it’s so alchemical. Especially in the age that we live in today, you would just assume that it’s rendered, like it doesn’t look real. Rachel Rose: But it literally was just in my kitchen. That’s all it is. I was really interested in that, which I think is similar to this thing of, I was actually just at the movies and many of us probably saw Gravity. It’s not that big of a deal, but you know, it can also change your relationship to living for a second and that’s meaningful. Ajay Kurian: I mean, outside of how a documentary can potentially move politics if it does. It depends, right? Depends what we’re thinking right now and maybe the world is past documentary help. But there’s also that feeling that art can be a transcendent experience that pushes you out of your body into a place where you can experience yourself in the world in a very different way. Those are very life-changing experiences. I remember when I interviewed you during Covid, I asked you whether you’ve had transcendent experiences with the work of art and you adamantly were like, yes I’ve had many. One that you mentioned was a story by Joyce Carol Oates. Rachel Rose: Maybe I was reading it at the time. Ajay Kurian: You had just finished reading it. It was a short story called Feral. Rachel Rose: I can’t even remember this. Ajay Kurian: Oh, man. It was intense because you kind of narrated the story and then you were like, I wanna cut that. But it’s a story of a couple that have been trying to have a kid for quite a long time. They finally do. They’re so pleased. The child’s very calm, pleasant and lovely. And then, unfortunately, almost drowns and the child’s revived. Then his demeanor is completely different. He’s like a feral child. He’s running around constantly escaping every situation, almost demonic. And throughout this, what you described is that the language is very simple, not flat, but just simple and matter of fact. And then in this last section where the child disappears and runs out into the woods, all of a sudden it’s like time is distended and every single thing is described in high definition. The end of the story is that you see the child howling in the woods with other children. Rachel Rose: It’s such a crazy, beautiful story. Thank you for reminding me of that. Ajay Kurian: It made me think of weapons if you saw that. Rachel Rose: Yes. Ajay Kurian: That came to mind and I was curious if that director had seen that. If you haven’t seen weapons, it’s actually really worth seeing. But it also just tapped me into that feeling of distortion and it made perfect sense to me why that would be one of those experiences that had that effect on you because it feels like a feeling that you chase too. Rachel Rose: You know what’s cool about that story? That I forgot about. Is that as a reader, when you’re reading it, the whole time, you’re in the position of the parents, right? I can’t remember exactly whose consciousness, but you’re in their position. Maybe you’re the mom. I can’t remember. Ajay Kurian: I think you are. Rachel Rose: So you’re like, why? You know, it’s all the bad stuff that’s happening to her because of her messed up kid and this kind of mid loss. What happened to my kid? His brain is damaged by the water and you’re in this whole detective story about, can she get him back? When’s he gonna release her to love her again? And then at the very end it’s revealed that this way bigger thing’s been happening the whole time. And who knows what happened under the water. Maybe it was just a little thing, it’s meaningless. Or maybe he was down there and he met a spirit. It just flips the whole relationship to the problem that you’ve been following the whole time. Ajay Kurian: That’s so weird that I didn’t think about that moment in the water. I guess I assumed that it’s like a life and death experience, but when you said who knows what happened in the water, it kind of gave me goosebumps. Something happened in the water. Rachel Rose: Or not. Ajay Kurian: Or not. Rachel Rose: Or nothing happened and he was born feral. Ajay Kurian: Have you had any transcendent experiences recently with the work of art? Rachel Rose: I have had two in the past four days, which is very unusual because I don’t know if it’s like this for a lot of you guys, but there are long stretches of just nothing. I saw Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker, a Belgian choreographer on Thursday night. I don’t need to paraphrase the whole piece, but it just completely blew my mind so much that I got Ian a ticket to go alone on Friday night, and made him go because I was like, our relationship needs you to see this. I can’t be the only one who saw this. That’s the level of masterpiece I thought it was. Then on Sunday, we took our kids to see hoppers, which also is just mind blowing. It’s like a Pocahontas story or Avatar. Now we’re in the animal world and we’re here to save the animals, and people are bad and they’re violent. They’re like there to destroy nature and we hope that humans will learn a lesson or something. Kind of exactly like Avatar or Pocahontas. Then it weaves into something much more complex and a kind of forgiveness and empathy for human behavior. And locating it within the kinds of needs and drives that all animals have in different degrees and is organ principled and organized in different ways. In the end it sort of offers human destruction and behavior an enormous amount of empathy. It’s a super complicated movie. I really don’t know how it got made. Ajay Kurian: In thinking about animal consciousness, witches and thinking about all the things that start to get banished from the world because there’s a particular kind of colonial rationality and also the beginnings of capitalism that are happening in this moment. I mean, this is the grounds for the film Enclosure and I’m sure you can speak to that in terms of what that means for that proto capitalist moment. But I’m gonna show this first. Rachel Rose: One of the ways that people thought about healing other people during this time was through transferring consciousnesses into bodies of animals. So if someone was sick with the flu and nothing was working, they might kill a goat. I don’t remember exactly, but you kill a goat and stick the goat next to the person to try to transfer the death into another body, for example, or the illness into another body. Ajay Kurian: And then you have a show that’s opening this week at Gladstone Gallery, which is called The Rest, where you’re thinking about landscape and politics and the stories that we tell ourselves, but again, through this sort of distorted lens. These are really beautiful paintings. I don’t think I’ve actually seen one of these in person, so I’m excited to see it in person. Rachel Rose: They’re small. They’re a little big, but they’re small. This is something I’ve been working on for maybe three or four years. It’s not actually in the Bible, but this allegory of the rest on the flight into Egypt, which is this moment that has been depicted throughout European Western painting from Caravaggio to Flemish to Southern, everywhere, of Mary, Jesus, and Joseph fleeing. Basically running to safety in Egypt as Herod’s army is on their back trying to persecute and capture them. And Jesus, I think, is three days old. So she’s like breastfeeding, very new mother shit. There’s this moment, it’s called the rest on the flight in Egypt, where they stop to rest and Joseph gets them food and usually there’s a water source. And usually symbolically, there’s this hay field that sprouts up automatically so you see Herod’s army is blocked and can’t find them. Mary sits in the center just breastfeeding Jesus, calmly. And at her feet often grow the exact herbs that she needs to feed him and feed herself. There’s this thing where the tree branch bends down to give Joseph the exact olive or depending on where they are, pear, whatever that he needs to give for her. The donkey just waits there and everything is perfect for her and for this moment. It’s a kind of time warp space thing. I’ve interpreted the allegory many different ways in different shows and different ways of working with the paintings. In this show I decided to reset the allegory in Northern Westchester. Now from the perspective of Mary. Taking Mary, Joseph, and Jesus out, and looking at the symbolic elements that she looks at in the painting as transposed to Northern Westchester now. And kind of experiencing the world from her perspective in that moment. So that’s what the show is. Ajay Kurian: Beautiful. Go see the show. It opens on Friday. Rachel Rose: Yeah, that’s it. Get full access to NewCrits Substack at newcrits.substack.com/subscribe [https://newcrits.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

10. apr. 202638 min