Reflect w/ Ed Fassio

Six Weeks Away: The AI Law Most Companies Don't Know They're Breaking

6 min · 1 de jul de 2026
Portada del episodio Six Weeks Away: The AI Law Most Companies Don't Know They're Breaking

Descripción

Reflect w/ Ed Fassio — where AI tells the stories that matter. August 2, 2026 is the enforcement date for the EU AI Act's high-risk AI provisions — and most enterprises still don't know if they're covered. HR tools, hiring algorithms, credit scoring systems, employee monitoring software — all potentially in scope. Penalties go up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover. This isn't a future regulation. It's here. Your Move: If you're deploying AI that touches hiring, credit, benefits, or worker monitoring, you need a compliance audit now. Start with an AI inventory — most organizations don't even have one. Treat any ambiguous system as high-risk until you can prove otherwise. — Reflect w/ Ed Fassio | reflectpodcast.com Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/fan_mail/new] Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/support] LISTEN TO MORE EPISODES: https://www.reflectpodcast.com [https://www.reflectpodcast.com]

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Reflect w/ Ed Fassio!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

137 episodios

episode Can You Put an AI on Trial? Some States Are Trying to Answer That Before It Matters. artwork

Can You Put an AI on Trial? Some States Are Trying to Answer That Before It Matters.

Reflect w/ Ed Fassio — where AI tells the stories that matter. Idaho and Utah have already passed laws banning AI legal personhood. Ohio is trying to follow. Florida's attorney general said — on record — that if ChatGPT were a person, he'd charge it with murder. Legal scholars are reaching back to Ancient Rome for frameworks. The question of who's responsible when AI causes harm has no clean answer yet. And the window to decide before something catastrophic forces the issue is closing. Your Move: Whether you're a leader, a founder, or a policymaker, the accountability gap in AI isn't a philosophical problem — it's a liability problem. Start thinking now about how your AI decisions would hold up in a courtroom. Because that day is coming. — Reflect w/ Ed Fassio | reflectpodcast.com Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/fan_mail/new] Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/support] LISTEN TO MORE EPISODES: https://www.reflectpodcast.com [https://www.reflectpodcast.com]

Ayer7 min
episode Six Weeks Away: The AI Law Most Companies Don't Know They're Breaking artwork

Six Weeks Away: The AI Law Most Companies Don't Know They're Breaking

Reflect w/ Ed Fassio — where AI tells the stories that matter. August 2, 2026 is the enforcement date for the EU AI Act's high-risk AI provisions — and most enterprises still don't know if they're covered. HR tools, hiring algorithms, credit scoring systems, employee monitoring software — all potentially in scope. Penalties go up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover. This isn't a future regulation. It's here. Your Move: If you're deploying AI that touches hiring, credit, benefits, or worker monitoring, you need a compliance audit now. Start with an AI inventory — most organizations don't even have one. Treat any ambiguous system as high-risk until you can prove otherwise. — Reflect w/ Ed Fassio | reflectpodcast.com Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/fan_mail/new] Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/support] LISTEN TO MORE EPISODES: https://www.reflectpodcast.com [https://www.reflectpodcast.com]

1 de jul de 20266 min
episode The US, the EU, and China Are Writing Three Different Futures. Only One Wins. artwork

The US, the EU, and China Are Writing Three Different Futures. Only One Wins.

Reflect w/ Ed Fassio — where AI tells the stories that matter. The US, the EU, and China are writing three fundamentally different answers to the same question: how should AI be governed? And whichever answer wins — or gets adopted by enough of the world's economies — becomes the default for your business, your data, your workforce, and your competitive position. Whether you had a vote in it or not. Innovation-first. Rights-first. State-first. Three philosophies. Not converging. Julius and Hale break down what each model means in practice, why the Brussels Effect means the EU standard will likely become the de facto global baseline, and what that means for every organization deploying AI today. This is the final episode of The Governance Question arc. Four episodes. One spine: Aza Raskin's warning that AI doesn't need to be malicious to be dangerous. Indifference is enough. Governance is how humanity stays present in its own future. Your Move: Know your regulatory exposure. Adopt the most demanding standard you face as your org-wide baseline. And engage — the policy conversations happening right now will shape the frameworks you operate under for the next decade. — Reflect w/ Ed Fassio | reflectpodcast.com Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/fan_mail/new] Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/support] LISTEN TO MORE EPISODES: https://www.reflectpodcast.com [https://www.reflectpodcast.com]

24 de jun de 202611 min
episode Every Industry Has a Safety Standard. AI Doesn't. Here's What One Would Look Like. artwork

Every Industry Has a Safety Standard. AI Doesn't. Here's What One Would Look Like.

Reflect w/ Ed Fassio — where AI tells the stories that matter. When a new drug goes to market, it clears a decade of trials. When a bridge gets built, every spec gets certified. When a financial product launches, there are disclosure requirements and audit trails. Every high-stakes system humanity has built has a safety standard. Except AI. A company can buy a model, connect it to their HR workflow, and start making decisions about people's livelihoods with less regulatory oversight than a food truck needs to sell tacos. Julius and Hale lay out what a minimum viable governance baseline actually looks like — five components any organization can implement without a dedicated compliance team. Not the EU AI Act. Not ISO 42001. The Monday morning version. The five: Model Card. Purpose Boundary Document. Audit Trail. Human Checkpoint Map. Incident Response Protocol. Your Move: Pick one AI system your org is currently using that touches a decision about a person. Run the five-component check. Count your yes answers. That's your governance score. Anything below five is a gap worth closing this quarter. — Reflect w/ Ed Fassio | reflectpodcast.com Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/fan_mail/new] Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2414886/support] LISTEN TO MORE EPISODES: https://www.reflectpodcast.com [https://www.reflectpodcast.com]

21 de jun de 202610 min