3-Minute Reframe with Cameron Conaway

The 90-Second Rule of Emotions

3 min · 23 de abr de 2026
portada del episodio The 90-Second Rule of Emotions

Descripción

Have you ever felt an emotion that seemed to last all day — long after the moment that triggered it had passed? In this episode, Cameron shares the story of one of the worst presentations of his life — a packed room, a disaster on stage, and an embarrassment that followed him into the shower and stayed for days. It took years to understand why. Harvard-trained neuroanatomist Jill Bolte Taylor documented something remarkable while studying her own stroke in real time: the physiological lifespan of an emotion is approximately 90 seconds. The chemicals flood your body, peak, and flush out. After that, if the feeling persists, it's because we're choosing — consciously or not — to keep retriggering it. The reframe: the next time a feeling hits hard, ask yourself — am I still feeling this, or am I now feeding it? Show Notes: Taylor, J.B. (2008). My Stroke of Insight. Viking. [https://amzn.to/3Qg7BNG] Related: Somatic Literacy [https://cameronconaway.com/somatic-literacy/]

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de 3-Minute Reframe with Cameron Conaway!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

30 episodios

episode Stacking Small Wins artwork

Stacking Small Wins

When it rains it pours — but it can go the other way too. A small win creates the conditions for another, and another, until momentum that started almost imperceptibly becomes real. The trouble is most of us are so wired to notice what's going wrong that we dismiss what's going right as too small to count. In this episode of 3-Minute Reframe, Cameron connects poet Samuel Green's idea of "small noticings" to Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer's landmark Progress Principle research — which analyzed nearly 12,000 diary entries to discover that small, forward momentum on meaningful work is the single greatest driver of inner work life. Show Notes: The Progress Principle — Amabile & Kramer, HBS [https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=40692] 3-Minute Reframe Archive [https://cameronconaway.com/3mr/]

28 de may de 20263 min
episode How Layoffs Changed Us artwork

How Layoffs Changed Us

In 2025, Cameron Conaway was leading one of the best teams of his career at Cisco when the company announced it was laying off 4,000 people. What followed wasn't just grief — it was a quiet, almost invisible shift in behavior. He stopped taking risks. Some colleagues stopped asking for feedback entirely. Others asked for it performatively, hoping visibility would protect them. In this episode of 3-Minute Reframe, he connects that experience to a landmark 1981 paper by Barry Staw, Lance Sandelands, and Jane Dutton on threat rigidity — and explores why a threat environment is often the exact moment we become least able to give or receive honest feedback. Show Notes: Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior — Staw, Sandelands & Dutton (1981) [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2392337] 3-Minute Reframe Archive [https://cameronconaway.com/3mr/]

21 de may de 20262 min
episode The Goo Stage artwork

The Goo Stage

"Is everything alright?" That's what a Chief Marketing Officer asked Cameron before delivering feedback that rattled his ego and left him disoriented in ways he couldn't explain. He didn't have language for what happened next. Virginia Satir did. In the 1970s, family therapist Virginia Satir mapped something she kept seeing in the families she worked with: change doesn't move in a straight line. After a foreign element arrives — a piece of feedback, a job loss, a diagnosis, a conversation that changes everything — what follows isn't smooth transition. It's chaos. Performance drops. Clarity disappears. You may feel less capable than before the change began. And then there's the butterfly. Inside the chrysalis, a caterpillar doesn't gradually transform — it dissolves completely into goo. A cellular soup of pure chaos. It is, for a time, neither caterpillar nor butterfly. That dissolution isn't a sign something went wrong. It's the biological prerequisite for what comes next. The reframe: if you're in the middle of something that feels unresolved right now, consider the possibility that you're not failing to change. You may simply be in the goo. Show Notes: Download the Satir Change Model [https://cameronconaway.com/change-management/#frameworks] The Satir Model (Satir et al., 1991) [https://www.amazon.com/Satir-Model-Family-Therapy-Beyond/dp/0831400781] Giving Feedback for Impact After Receipt [https://cameronconaway.com/blog/giving-feedback-iar/]

30 de abr de 20263 min