Mega Edition: Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 4-6) (5/24/26)

Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 17-18) (5/28/26)

Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned. Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud [https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo]

Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 14-16) (5/28/26)

Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned. Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud [https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo]

Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 11-13) (5/27/26)

Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned. Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud [https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo]

Judge Berman Unseals Epstein Related Grand Jury Documents In New York (5/27/26)

Judge  Berman’s decision to unseal the Epstein grand jury documents represents one of the most forceful judicial pushes for transparency in a case that has been defined by secrecy, institutional hesitancy, and years of bureaucratic dodgeball. In his ruling, Berman made clear that the new federal Epstein transparency law leaves no ambiguity: Congress intended these records to be opened, and the courts are obligated to follow that mandate. He dismissed the government’s familiar attempts to stall—claims of “ongoing investigations,” potential harm, or procedural barriers—pointing out that federal authorities had ample time to act and repeatedly failed. His message carried an unmistakable edge: protecting the system’s reputation is not a valid reason to keep the public in the dark. At the same time, Berman cautioned against expecting some blockbuster revelation hidden inside the files. He suggested that the documents will likely confirm what is already obvious—that Epstein benefited from prosecutorial deference, behind-the-scenes dealmaking, and a pattern of decisions that favored a wealthy predator over vulnerable victims. Still, his ruling is a major break from the institutional instinct to bury mistakes. By ordering the documents unsealed, Berman signaled that the era of reflexive secrecy around Epstein is collapsing, and that the public finally has a right to inspect how a serial offender was allowed to operate with impunity for so long. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: DOJ cleared to release files from Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 sex trafficking trial | Fox News [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-cleared-release-secret-jeffrey-epstein-case-grand-jury-materials]

Spencer Kuvin And His Comments On Prince Andrew (5/27/26)

The story centers on renewed pressure for Prince Andrew to cooperate with U.S. investigators examining Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking network. U.S. authorities had publicly stated that Andrew had provided “zero cooperation” after prosecutors and the FBI sought to interview him about Epstein, despite Andrew previously saying he was willing to help any appropriate law-enforcement inquiry. Lawyers for Epstein survivors argued that Andrew needed to stop hiding behind royal status and answer questions, especially because he was not just a distant acquaintance of Epstein but someone repeatedly tied to the scandal through his friendship with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his disastrous public explanations, and Virginia Giuffre’s allegations that she was trafficked to him when she was 17, which Andrew has denied. The larger point is that Andrew’s refusal, delay, or failure to sit down with U.S. investigators made the scandal worse because it fed the impression that powerful people were still being shielded from the same scrutiny ordinary witnesses would face. The story frames Andrew not as someone being asked to provide a casual statement, but as a figure who could potentially help investigators understand Epstein’s circle, travel, contacts, and the way access to young women allegedly moved through that world. Andrew’s denials remain part of the record, but so does the ugly reality that U.S. prosecutors publicly called out his lack of cooperation, survivor attorneys demanded answers, and the Epstein case once again exposed the gap between public promises of transparency and what actually happens when investigators seek answers from someone protected by wealth, title, and institutional insulation. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com