AI Diatribe
There's a real legal case where grieving high school students used Character.ai to interact with a deceased classmate. The parents sued. Everyone in this conversation had a different reaction to that — and none of them fully wrong. That's the kind of problem this episode keeps circling: not whether AI and children is a risk (it is), but who gets to define the harm, who owns the memory of a person once they're gone, and whether our instinct to protect kids is sometimes just discomfort with a technology we don't fully understand. Dr. Nomisha Kurian, child AI safety researcher, and Jake Rozran, co-founder of MyDD.ai, join AI Diatribe Host Jason Lowe and Co-Host Matt Konwiser to work through grief bots, the sycophancy of AI-simulated relatives, the empathy gap in LLMs, and one under-discussed idea: that playfulness might be a more effective child safety feature than restriction. There's also a hard question about what happens to child development if the next pandemic hits while generative AI is already embedded in daily life. The answer isn't governance. Matt makes that point clearly. Ethics has to be baked into the systems, because we can't trust people to configure their own moral constraints. Listen on the channel of your choice. #AIDiatribe #AIAndChildren #ChildSafetyAI #GriefTech #NomishaKurian #JakeRozran #AIEthics #GenerativeAI #AI #DigitalParenting #AILiteracy
37 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de AI Diatribe!