RobnPod

RobnPod

Rearranging The Deck Chairs

53 min · 16 de sep de 2024
portada del episodio Rearranging The Deck Chairs

Descripción

After revealing Week 4's card, Eben and the Commissioner dive into: * What schools should the Pac-12 dip into next, and does adding any school that isn't a "national brand" matter to the Pac-12's aims of returning to "Power" relevance * Why Stanford and Cal won't dip into their endowment to scrounge for couch change to pay ACC exit fees * Adam Silver reminds Eben (directly!) of his desire for a federal sports betting framework on the day that legislators drop a federal sports betting framework * Why a famous former Michigan football player suing the NCAA for $50 million is trying to get his case made part of the current class action settlement – and extend the window for athlete payments to several years earlier * Would a rejected mechanism in the House settlement (that would've attempted to root out fraudulent NIL deals) have resulted in the unfair suppression of player wages? * The FBI's investigation of more college basketball corruption – this time re: an Atlantic 10 team Summer Bahamas junket gone wrong. It's giving Fyre Festival.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de RobnPod!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

8 episodios

episode Rearranging The Deck Chairs artwork

Rearranging The Deck Chairs

After revealing Week 4's card, Eben and the Commissioner dive into: * What schools should the Pac-12 dip into next, and does adding any school that isn't a "national brand" matter to the Pac-12's aims of returning to "Power" relevance * Why Stanford and Cal won't dip into their endowment to scrounge for couch change to pay ACC exit fees * Adam Silver reminds Eben (directly!) of his desire for a federal sports betting framework on the day that legislators drop a federal sports betting framework * Why a famous former Michigan football player suing the NCAA for $50 million is trying to get his case made part of the current class action settlement – and extend the window for athlete payments to several years earlier * Would a rejected mechanism in the House settlement (that would've attempted to root out fraudulent NIL deals) have resulted in the unfair suppression of player wages? * The FBI's investigation of more college basketball corruption – this time re: an Atlantic 10 team Summer Bahamas junket gone wrong. It's giving Fyre Festival.

16 de sep de 202453 min
episode It Means Everything To Everyone, So It Doesn't Mean Anything To Anyone artwork

It Means Everything To Everyone, So It Doesn't Mean Anything To Anyone

ESPN's David Purdum joins us for a discussion recapping his recent reporting on the NFL's new (and old) policies and procedures to help ensure betting integrity, steps than emerged amongst a litany of NFL player betting-related suspensions [https://www.espn.com/espn/betting/story/_/id/39908218/a-line-sports-gambling-scandals-2018] in the past several years. We cover: * Whether not knowing the rules, or not caring about the rules, contributed more to the NFL's many betting-related suspensions * What comprises the NFL's newly instituted player education curriculum, and the new tactics intended to make it resonate * Why "Integrity" means totally different things to different people, simultaneously, and what the NFL means when it invokes the term * The difference between protecting the optics of a product versus protecting the actual "integrity" of that product * What element of "integrity" the next big NFL betting scandal is likely to involve

3 de sep de 202451 min