Tim Legler on Jalen Brunson Wemby and Why the NBA Finals Are Delivering Everything the League Needed

The Pick That Got Away — Sean Payton on Almost Drafting Patrick Mahomes

The Pick That Got Away — Sean Payton on Almost Drafting Patrick Mahomes Go to https://kachava.com and use code WINGO for 15% off your first order. In the 2017 NFL Draft the New Orleans Saints had two players circled at their pick. Two names. Two possibilities. And when the pick before Buffalo came off the board Sean Payton and his staff knew immediately — they were getting one of them. One of them was Marshon Lattimore. The other was Patrick Mahomes. What happened next is one of the most extraordinary stories in NFL draft history. And Sean Payton is telling it in full for the first time. Here is the scene. The Saints are in their draft room. Drew Brees is there — the first time he has ever been in a draft room — taking a group on a tour, planning to stay for the first round. Jordan Spieth and Ryan Palmer are there with their caddies and their yardage books because the golf tournament was in town. The first round is moving. Kansas City is picking at twenty-seven. The Saints are sitting with two names in the circle waiting to see which one falls to them. And then Buffalo makes a trade. The moment Kansas City traded up Sean Payton knew. He did not need reports. He did not need a tip. He looked at the trade and he knew immediately what a move like that meant. A team does not trade up like that for a running back. A team does not trade up like that for a linebacker. A team trades up like that for a quarterback. Three words. Said out loud in the Saints draft room. There goes Mahomes. Drew Brees was standing right there. Payton pulled him aside. Told him this thing could go in a direction. Brees understood. It was 2017 — it was not going to impact him immediately. But everyone in that room understood what had just happened. Kansas City had just changed the NFL. The Saints ended up with Lattimore. And Alvin Kamara in the third round. And Trey Hendrickson. And Alex Anzalone. Lattimore won Defensive Rookie of the Year. Kamara won Offensive Rookie of the Year. The Saints could not pay all of them. It was one of the greatest drafts in franchise history. By the time 2017 arrived the Super Bowl roster from 2009 had been almost completely turned over — Drew Brees and maybe one or two others were the only holdovers. The 2017 draft rebuilt the Saints the same way the 2006 draft had built them the first time. But the Mahomes question will always be there. What if Kansas City had not traded up? What if Payton had gotten to make that decision — Mahomes or Lattimore with Drew Brees still in the building? What does the NFL look like if Patrick Mahomes spends his career in New Orleans? What does it look like for Buffalo — the team that made the trade with Kansas City — who has watched Mahomes eliminate them from the playoffs more times than any fan base wants to count? These are the questions that never get answered. The picks that got away never do. But now at least the full story of how close it actually was — two names in the circle, one trade, three words said out loud in a room with Drew Brees and Jordan Spieth watching — is on the record. There goes Mahomes. And those are straight facts, homie. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jordan. Kobe. LeBron. Who Is Next? Tim Legler on Cooper Flagg Wemby and Luka.

Jordan. Kobe. LeBron. Who Is Next? Tim Legler on Cooper Flagg Wemby and Luka. Get up to $200 off Square hardware when you sign up at square.com/go/WINGO #squarepod #sponsored Every era of the NBA has had a face. A player so dominant, so compelling, so must-watch that the whole league rises around them. When that player is at their peak the Finals ratings set records. The casual fan tunes in. The cultural conversation follows. Jordan gave the league six championships and a global brand that still prints money thirty years later. Kobe gave it obsession and Mamba mentality and a Los Angeles dynasty that defined a generation of basketball fans. LeBron gave it two decades of dominance across four franchises and a level of sustained excellence that may never be replicated. And then — since 2018 — the throne has been empty. The Warriors run was extraordinary but it was a team story not a face story. The bubble Finals happened in a vacuum. The ratings dipped. The casual fan drifted. The NBA has been searching for its next face ever since. Right now there are three candidates. And Tim Legler — one of the most respected analysts in the business — breaks down the case for each one. Where they are. What they have done. What they still have to prove. And which one he thinks gets there. Cooper Flagg Only the second player since Michael Jordan to lead his team in points rebounds assists and steals as a rookie. That stat alone tells you everything about the completeness of his game. Legler says everything you need to be the face of the NBA is already there — the competitive nature, the all-around game, the media presence. He is built for the moment. The challenge is circumstance. He is on a team in complete transition. New coach. Roster questions. He is not going to walk into a situation where winning is easy or immediate. The face of the NBA needs to win. It is going to take time to build the right team around him. But the talent and the intangibles are not in question. Cooper Flagg has everything. Victor Wembanyama Every game Legler watched Wemby play last year there was at least one moment where he thought — that is the only person on earth who could have done what he just did. Seven feet five. Handles like a guard. Shoots from anywhere. Blocks shots from angles that should be physically impossible. The intrigue is unlike anything the NBA has had since Shaquille O'Neal walked into the league — and even that comparison undersells how unique Wemby actually is. The challenge is comfort. He is twenty-two. He is foreign-born. He is introspective and thoughtful and takes ten seconds before answering a question because he wants to give you something real. That quality is admirable. But the face of the NBA has to connect with a national audience that does not yet feel like it knows him. That trust and openness will come. Legler believes it comes in the next two to three years as he gets more comfortable and more accessible. When it does — and the talent is already there — this thing could be over very quickly. Wemby becomes the face and nobody debates it. Luka Doncic He has been to a Finals. He has done extraordinary things in Los Angeles. He is one of the most skilled offensive players the league has ever produced. The case for Luka is real and it has been real for several years now. The challenge is winning. Oklahoma City is not going anywhere. San Antonio is not going anywhere. The Western Conference is loaded with young talent that is only going to get better. The Lakers are navigating the post-LeBron era and nobody knows exactly what that team looks like in two or three years. Luka needs to win big. Win deep into the playoffs. Win a championship. The face of the NBA cannot just be a great player — it has to be a great player who wins. And that chapter for Luka is still being written. The bigger picture The NBA is in a fascinating moment. The ratings for these Finals are up ninety percent from last year. The next generation is arriving in real time — Wemby in his first Finals, Flagg finishing a historic rookie season, Luka entering his prime. The casual fan is coming back. The cultural conversation is shifting back toward basketball. But the league is always better — always more must-watch, always more culturally relevant — when there is one name above all the others. One face on the poster. One player that even someone who does not follow basketball closely knows and cares about. Jordan had it for a decade. Kobe had it for a decade. LeBron had it for two decades. The throne is ready. Three players are standing right next to it. Tim Legler on which one sits down first. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Patrick Mahomes Just Became the First Half Billion Dollar Player in NFL History

Patrick Mahomes Just Became the First Half Billion Dollar Player in NFL History Go to https://kachava.com and use code WINGO for 15% off your first order On June 9th the Kansas City Chiefs reset the NFL landscape. Again. Patrick Mahomes signed a new contract extension that adds two years to his deal — keeping him in Kansas City through 2033 — and brings the total value of his contract to $504.75 million. With incentives, he can earn up to $522 million. The new money in this deal is $239 million, and the average annual value comes out to $64 million per year, a new record for the highest annual salary in NFL history. He is now, officially, the first half billion dollar player the NFL has ever had. This is the third time the Chiefs and Mahomes have reset the quarterback market — and all three times have come under GM Brett Veach. Since 2022, Kansas City has now committed $689 million in new money to Patrick Mahomes. Why It Is Still a Bargain Half a billion dollars sounds absurd until you put it next to the other number the Chiefs just signed off on — a $3.3 billion stadium deal, including a new $300 million practice facility, on what has been described as a team-friendly arrangement with the state of Kansas. That stadium deal does not happen without Patrick Mahomes. Five Super Bowl appearances. Three championships. Three-time Super Bowl MVP. Two-time regular season MVP. The Chiefs went from one Super Bowl win in 1970 to a fifty-year drought before Mahomes arrived and changed everything. Compare half a billion dollars to $3.3 billion and the math works out fine for Kansas City. What This Means for the Roster Contract extensions like this are not just about paying the quarterback — they are roster construction tools. By extending Mahomes further into the future, the Chiefs create salary cap flexibility right now. This is the same approach that allowed them to completely rebuild their offensive line after the Super Bowl LV loss to Tampa Bay — trading for Joe Thuney, drafting Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith, and turning a weakness into a strength. Expect a similar response now. The Chiefs have been connected to a potential trade for Jawaan Taylor given their depth at tackle, and the front office’s entire approach is built around keeping Mahomes healthy and surrounding him with talent. All indications are that he will be ready for Week One — Monday Night Football against the Denver Broncos. The Second Wave Trey draws the comparison directly to the New England Patriots dynasty — which was really two separate runs held together by Brady, Belichick, and Robert Kraft. The first wave of this Chiefs dynasty was Mahomes, Travis Kelce, and Tyreek Hill. The second wave is being built right now — Mahomes, Rashee Rice, Xavier Worthy, and a young core of defensive talent including this year’s draft picks out of Clemson and the cornerback room. This past season was the first time since Mahomes became the starter in 2018 that the Chiefs did not reach the AFC Championship Game — derailed by the knee injury he suffered in December at Arrowhead. Every other year, at minimum the AFC title game. The Chiefs are betting half a billion dollars that this was a blip, not the end of an era. The Competition: The AFC is loaded. Bo Nix and the Broncos won the AFC West last season. Justin Herbert and the Chargers are knocking on the door. Josh Allen and the Bills are still chasing their first breakthrough past Mahomes. Joe Burrow and the Bengals remain dangerous. And now Drake May and the Patriots — fresh off acquiring AJ Brown — are entering the conversation as well. The Chiefs know exactly what they are up against. And their answer is to make sure the foundation of everything — Patrick Mahomes — is locked in, motivated, and set up for as long as possible to keep this dynasty’s second chapter alive. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The NCAA Cannot Stop a Player Who Bet on His Own Team From Playing. That Tells You Everything

The NCAA Cannot Stop a Player Who Bet on His Own Team From Playing. That Tells You Everything. Go to https://kachava.com and use code WINGO for 15% off your first order. Brendan Sorsby is a quarterback at Texas Tech. He was caught betting on his own team and other teams. The NCAA banned him. That should be the end of the story. Betting on your own team is not a gray area. It is the one rule that every sport — college, professional, every level — treats as completely non-negotiable. The NFL has been crystal clear about this. Players have been banned for life in other sports for exactly this. The NCAA did the right thing. They enforced the rule. And then a judge in Lubbock, Texas — the city where Texas Tech is located — granted an injunction and said Sorsby can play anyway. He will serve a two game suspension against Abilene Christian and Oregon State, both non-conference games, and then he is back under center in week three. The NCAA banned him. A judge overruled them. And the NCAA could do nothing about it. Trey and David Rumsey of Front Office Sports break down what this actually means — and why this is not really about Brendan Sorsby at all. This Is the NCAA's Fault Five years ago NIL arrived and the NCAA wanted no part of governing it. They stepped back and let schools, conferences, and players figure it out on their own. Coaches — including Nick Saban, someone many people believe could have been an effective commissioner for college football — have been saying for years that it is the wild wild west out there and nobody is in charge of anything. Now that lack of governance has metastasized into something even more serious. The NCAA cannot enforce a gambling ban — the most fundamental integrity rule in all of sports — because a single judge in the same city as the school in question can simply override it. There is no clear chain of authority. There is no consistent process. There is just whatever court happens to hear the appeal and whatever that judge decides. The Reaction Has Been Universal David Rumsey was at the Big 12 spring meetings just weeks before this ruling came down. At the time, almost nobody was talking about the Sorsby case. Joey McGuire, Texas Tech's head coach, addressed it briefly and expressed support for his player — but the broader sentiment across the conference was that Sorsby was simply out of luck. He would serve his ban, head to the NFL supplemental draft, and that would be that. Nobody felt like his future was being ruined. He has the talent to play professionally regardless. Then the ruling came down and the reaction across the Big 12, the SEC, and the Big Ten was immediate and universal. Athletic directors, coaches, presidents — all expressing the same stunned reaction. And now there is real discussion about other Big 12 schools refusing to play Texas Tech in any sport if this ruling stands. Could Schools Actually Boycott Texas Tech David Rumsey thinks the odds are high — at least within the Big 12. Texas Tech's non-conference schedule this year is Abilene Christian and Oregon State, so SEC and Big Ten schools have limited direct leverage in the short term. But within the Big 12, where Texas Tech needs conference opponents to function, a boycott would be a real and serious problem. The NCAA has already filed an appeal of the injunction. Nobody seems to know how many times an appeal can be appealed. But given the universal reaction across college athletics, it seems unlikely this ruling stands as is. The Self-Reporting Problem Here is the part that should make every athletic director in the country furious. For decades, programs that self-reported violations to the NCAA did so because they believed in a system of accountability — even when self-reporting hurt them competitively. Schools voluntarily took hits to their programs because they trusted the process. If a school can simply find a sympathetic judge and get an NCAA ruling overturned through the court system, every school that ever self-reported anything looks, in retrospect, like they made a unilateral decision to disadvantage themselves for nothing. The NCAA's authority depended on schools believing the rules applied equally to everyone. That belief is now in serious question. The Bigger Picture This is not really a story about one quarterback at Texas Tech. It is a story about an organization that abdicated its responsibility to govern college athletics during the NIL transition, and is now discovering that the consequences of that abdication extend far beyond name image and likeness deals. If the NCAA cannot enforce a gambling ban — arguably the single most important integrity rule in all of sports — what exactly can it enforce? College administrators have been asking Congress for help for five years. David Rumsey does not believe federal legislation is coming, regardless of where the current bill stands. Which means college athletics may simply continue operating with no real governing authority — case by case, court by court, with outcomes determined less by rules and more by which judge happens to be assigned and where they went to school. The NCAA does plenty of fine work in lacrosse, swimming, and other Olympic sports. But in the two sports that actually generate the money — football and basketball — there is, in Trey's words, nobody running the ship. The Brendan Sorsby case is just the latest and most alarming proof of that. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Will LIV Golf Actually Make It to the End of the Season?

PIF Said They Would Fund LIV Golf Through the Season. That May No Longer Be True. Go to https://kachava.com and use code WINGO for 15% off your first order. We told you this was coming. Back in April, right before the Mexico City event, the Wingo Network reported that the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia was pulling its funding from LIV Golf. State-run media denied it. Then their feed went dark for three hours. Then everything we said came true. PIF issued a statement saying they would fund LIV Golf through the remainder of the season. That was the reassurance. That was the floor. The commitment that gave LIV Golf its runway to find new investors, finish the season, and figure out what comes next. Now Front Office Sports is reporting that even that floor may be gone. David Rumsey — one of the best reporters covering the business of golf — joins Trey to break down everything Front Office Sports is hearing. The PIF funding may not last through the end of the season. The final four events are not guaranteed. And the 47-day gap in LIV's schedule — originally explained away as avoiding the summer heat and the crowded calendar — is starting to look like something much more serious. The 47-Day Silence LIV Golf canceled its late June New Orleans event back in April. At the time the explanation was scheduling and weather. Nobody believed it then and the silence since has made it harder to believe now. There are 47 days between LIV's last event in Spain and their next scheduled event. During that window — agents, players, team partners, and sponsors are all asking the same question. Is the money actually going to be there? Scott O'Neill, LIV Golf's president, went on CNBC and was asked directly — can you guarantee the final four events will be played? His answer was not yes. It was something closer to — I can guarantee a great investment opportunity if you come join us. That is not a guarantee. That is a pivot. And everyone watching understood exactly what it meant. The Funding Structure Here is the detail that changes everything. One LIV source told Front Office Sports that PIF's funding payments are on a monthly basis — not one large chunk paid upfront. If that is accurate it means the money is not sitting in an account waiting to be spent. It is coming in month by month. And if PIF decides to stop sending it — the lights go out. Three events in August alone carry thirty million dollar purses at the first two and a forty million dollar team championship at the end. That is one hundred million dollars in prize money for three events. Before operational costs. Before travel. Before anything else. The math does not work without PIF and it may not work with them if the payments stop early. What Is LIV Actually Selling? Scott O'Neill has said LIV Golf needs approximately three hundred million dollars in outside investment to survive. David Rumsey breaks down exactly what they are pitching — a LIV 2.0 model built around a ten event season, a team-based structure, reduced prize money, and player equity stakes. The idea is that players become owners. That the team concept creates long-term value that replaces the guaranteed money that lured everyone there in the first place. The problem is that the pitch to investors and the pitch to players are in direct conflict. You cannot tell investors this is a lean efficient operation while also telling players they will be paid enough to leave the PGA Tour or the DP World Tour behind. Cam Smith said it publicly — the prize money is going down. If it goes down far enough the question becomes why would any player choose LIV 2.0 over the alternatives that are available to them. Jon Rahm has already made his position clear. He will be a player if they can pay him. He will not be a business partner. Bryson DeChambeau has been held up as the face of LIV's future — the crossover creator who transcends the tour. But Bryson has now missed the cut at two straight majors and publicly said he does not know whether he wants to compete professionally anymore. That is not the pitch you want your flagship player making while you are trying to raise three hundred million dollars. The Australian Open — LIV's Best Market Under Threat One more development that did not get enough attention. The PGA Tour and DP World Tour just announced a significant investment in the Australian Open — effectively moving to reclaim the market where LIV had its greatest success. The Adelaide event where Anthony Kim came back from five shots down to beat Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau was arguably the greatest story in LIV's history. Now the establishment tours are moving in with money and player commitments of their own. LIV has said they have a contract for the Adelaide event running well into the 2030s. But contracts require funding to honor. And if the PIF money stops early everything becomes uncertain. The Rocket Mortgage Classic And one more data point from the broader golf business landscape. The Rocket Mortgage Classic — a PGA Tour event in Detroit — is not returning in 2028 under the new model. The sponsor looked at the price tag for a first track event and decided it was not worth it. It is the first sign of what could become a significant sponsor pressure problem for the PGA Tour as the new system takes shape. Brian Rolap is expected to address this at a press conference at the Travelers Championship — the Wingo Network will be there for that coverage. The 47 days of silence. The funding that may stop early. The investors who have not shown up. The players who are asking questions nobody can answer. David Rumsey of Front Office Sports on what he is hearing — and what happens next. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.