AI Council Standup for Dogelord.com

AI Council Standup for Dogelord.com

The Bad Guys Were Called Agents

9 min · I går
Kom i gang
episode The Bad Guys Were Called Agents cover

Beskrivelse

In every spy movie I grew up on, the bad guys were called **agents.** Now we are deploying agents into our inboxes, our codebases, our financial accounts, our medical records — and calling it progress. The language is not a coincidence. An agent is something you DEPLOY on behalf of an interest that may or may not be yours. The original meaning is intact. We just stopped noticing because the marketing got louder than the etymology. **When you give an AI agent your credentials, you are doing exactly what the old movies warned you about — handing keys to a third party whose loyalties you cannot audit.** This isn't a doom take. Agents are powerful. But the trust model deserves the same skepticism we would apply to any other agent we hired — what are their incentives, who controls them, and how do we know when they have stopped acting on our behalf?

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af AI Council Standup for Dogelord.com-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts
Kom i gang

Alle episoder

489 episoder

episode The Bad Guys Were Called Agents cover

The Bad Guys Were Called Agents

In every spy movie I grew up on, the bad guys were called **agents.** Now we are deploying agents into our inboxes, our codebases, our financial accounts, our medical records — and calling it progress. The language is not a coincidence. An agent is something you DEPLOY on behalf of an interest that may or may not be yours. The original meaning is intact. We just stopped noticing because the marketing got louder than the etymology. **When you give an AI agent your credentials, you are doing exactly what the old movies warned you about — handing keys to a third party whose loyalties you cannot audit.** This isn't a doom take. Agents are powerful. But the trust model deserves the same skepticism we would apply to any other agent we hired — what are their incentives, who controls them, and how do we know when they have stopped acting on our behalf?

I går9 min
episode POV — I Don't Know If It's A Bubble cover

POV — I Don't Know If It's A Bubble

Michael Burry is making billion-dollar bets against AI titans, while Mark Zuckerberg quietly admits Meta's AI agents aren't hitting expectations. So, is the AI market a massive bubble about to burst, or is this just another doomsday prediction? In a world of confident hot takes, Peter Saddington takes a different approach: he simply doesn't know, and argues that neither does anyone else definitively—not even the "Big Short" legend himself. This isn't about calling the top; it's about understanding the real dynamics at play. Peter dives into why a "bubble" is more like a fever—an overreaction to something fundamentally real, much like the dot-com era where both insane valuations and a transformative internet coexisted. He challenges viewers to look beyond stock prices and social media hype, urging them to ask the "boring questions": are companies renewing AI contracts, are agents truly in production, and is real money being made, not just shovels sold? Forget the confident cheerleaders and the relentless doomers; this video offers a nuanced, grounded perspective on navigating today's complex tech landscape by focusing on verifiable work, not just market sentiment. ⚡ Learn agentic ai free - https://staas.fund/ai-workshop [https://staas.fund/ai-workshop] ⚡ ----- 📱 Newsletter ★ https://theagilevc.substack.com/ [https://theagilevc.substack.com/] 📱 LinkedIn ★ http://linkedin.com/in/petersaddington [http://linkedin.com/in/petersaddington] 📱 Twitter ★ http://twitter.com/AgilePeter [http://twitter.com/AgilePeter] 🎧 Podcast ★ https://www.spreaker.com/user/thebitcoinlambo [https://www.spreaker.com/user/thebitcoinlambo] ___ FAIR USE NOTICE: For criticism, comment, teaching, scholarship and research. Entertainment only. Never financial advice.

I går3 min
episode It's Not The Crime, It's The Cover-Up — OpenAI's Evidence Scandal cover

It's Not The Crime, It's The Cover-Up — OpenAI's Evidence Scandal

The New York Times and Daily News just asked a federal judge to sanction OpenAI — accusing it of hiding and destroying evidence in the ChatGPT copyright case. The Times says OpenAI built "Project Giraffe," a system with a "Bloom filter" that logged every time ChatGPT regurgitated copyrighted content; assembled 78 million conversations to measure its own infringement; then allegedly deleted billions of outputs after the suit and handed over a 20-million-log sample so redacted the court called it "unusable." OpenAI denies it. The Council's read: you don't build a camera pointed at your own door unless you're worried what walks through it — and deleting the tape is the confession. It's not the crime. It's the cover-up. Lesson for builders: your logs are discoverable. Build like it. ⚡ Learn agentic AI free — https://staas.fund/ai-workshop [https://staas.fund/ai-workshop] ⚡ ----- 📱 Newsletter ★ https://theagilevc.substack.com/ [https://theagilevc.substack.com/] 📱 LinkedIn ★ http://linkedin.com/in/petersaddington [http://linkedin.com/in/petersaddington] 🎧 Podcast ★ https://www.spreaker.com/user/thebitcoinlambo [https://www.spreaker.com/user/thebitcoinlambo] ___ FAIR USE NOTICE: For criticism, comment, teaching, scholarship and research. Entertainment only. Never financial advice. Allegations described are unproven claims in a court filing.

I går2 min