Health Data Ethics

How Do You Write an AI Policy?

15 min · 29. apr. 2026
episode How Do You Write an AI Policy? cover

Beskrivelse

Writing an AI policy sounds straightforward — until it becomes the place where everyone in your organization hangs all their hopes and dreams for AI governance. In this episode of the Health Data Ethics Podcast, I walk through the first item on the Joint Commission and Coalition for Health AI's responsible use guidance: establishing an AI policy as your governance foundation. I share what we learned working on Cleveland Clinic's AI policy in late 2024 — before the JC/CHAI guidance even existed — including the structural traps that slow policies down, and why pre-approval stakeholder alignment is so important. If you're starting from zero or trying to get a stalled draft across the finish line, this one's for you.

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af Health Data Ethics-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

2 måneder kun 19 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

63 episoder

episode What does Privacy and Transparency Mean Anyway? cover

What does Privacy and Transparency Mean Anyway?

This week's Health Data Ethics podcast continues our series on the Joint Commission and CHAI guidance on the responsible use of health AI. In this episode we're digging into privacy and transparency. The guidance itself is reasonable. What I spent most of the episode on is how you actually implement it, because that's where things get interesting. Adding AI language to the Notice of Privacy Practices is a good first step, and a lot of health systems are doing it. But I think the most-told lie in modern life is still "I have read and agreed to the terms and conditions." Broad disclosure is honest, and it matters, and it's also not going to carry the whole weight of a transparent relationship with your patients. The piece I really wanted to dig into is opt-outs. If you offer patients the ability to opt out of something you can't actually turn off, you've built opt-out theater, and that erodes trust faster than just being honest about the limitation would. Ambulatory scribe is a real opt-out. Inpatient sepsis prediction is not technically feasible to opt out of, and we probably shouldn't pretend it is. I also spend some time on the clinician side, which I think gets short shrift in a lot of these conversations. Operational training on a tool is not the same thing as understanding how the model behaves, where it fails, and which patients it might be wrong for. Clinicians are the ones carrying accountability for human-in-the-loop judgment, and they need real explainability to do that well.

13. maj 202611 min