In Flux

Morality Is Not What You Think It Is

1 h 41 min · 3. mar. 2026
episode Morality Is Not What You Think It Is cover

Beskrivelse

In this episode, Micah and I explore a question that completely reframes morality: What if right and wrong are not just rules — but alignment or misalignment with reality itself? Drawing from Aristotle’s idea that virtue shapes perception, John Vervaeke’s account of beauty as the recognition of deeper realness, and the classical privation theory of evil, we examine whether morality might be structural rather than merely legal. If reality has an objective order independent of our preferences, what grounds that order? Is moral experience just projection, or are we perceiving something real? And if reality itself is intelligible and ordered, what does that imply about God? This conversation moves from philosophy to theology, from beauty to sin, and from perception to participation. Not a final answer — but a serious attempt at integration.

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af In Flux-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

45 episoder

episode Morality Is Not What You Think It Is cover

Morality Is Not What You Think It Is

In this episode, Micah and I explore a question that completely reframes morality: What if right and wrong are not just rules — but alignment or misalignment with reality itself? Drawing from Aristotle’s idea that virtue shapes perception, John Vervaeke’s account of beauty as the recognition of deeper realness, and the classical privation theory of evil, we examine whether morality might be structural rather than merely legal. If reality has an objective order independent of our preferences, what grounds that order? Is moral experience just projection, or are we perceiving something real? And if reality itself is intelligible and ordered, what does that imply about God? This conversation moves from philosophy to theology, from beauty to sin, and from perception to participation. Not a final answer — but a serious attempt at integration.

3. mar. 20261 h 41 min