Music Row Dealmakers

Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed

44 min · 27. feb. 2026
episode Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed cover

Beskrivelse

Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2500070/fan_mail/new] Dealmakers Barry Neil Shrum, Esq. and Dennis Glenn Disney Esq. discuss the 9th Circuit's recent opinion in the Sedlik v. Kat Von D case involving Jeffery Sedlik's famous "Shh" photograph of Miles Davis, which Kat Von D tatooed on the arm of her friend.  In the 9th's opinion, there were two concurring opinions which bemoaned the application of the "intrinsic" component of the 9th Circuit's two party analysis, arguing that the objective standard should be abolished.   Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2500070/support]

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af Music Row Dealmakers-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

21 episoder