Piercing the Veil
Placing political appointees and campaign donors into ambassadorships has been a long-standing tradition of American politics. The practice has generated strong criticism from career diplomats and political scientists for eroding diplomatic performance and public trust. Join us for today’s discussion as we debate whether ambassadors should only be career civil servants or if political appointees also have a place. • What qualities determine an effective ambassador? • What is the rationale for political appointees and rich donors becoming ambassadors? What about for career diplomats? • Which ambassadorships are the most politically desirable? • Do lavish parties enhance diplomatic presence? References: Comment on this episode on our Substack [https://piercingtheveil.substack.com/p/4-ambassadors] Apple Podcasts [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/piercing-the-veil/id1613340524] Spotify [https://open.spotify.com/show/69kslxqvwNHGD4YWNKmSgT] Email: piercingtheveil@substack.com This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit piercingtheveil.substack.com [https://piercingtheveil.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]
4 episoder
Kommentarer
0Vær den første til at kommentere
Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af Piercing the Veil-fællesskabet!