The Son Of Liberty Podcast

Episode 3: Clarence Thomas, Section 230, and Free Speech Online

58 min · 9. apr. 2021
Billede af episoden Episode 3: Clarence Thomas, Section 230, and Free Speech Online

Beskrivelse

Today, I'm talking about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act passed in 1996. A lot of contention is going around about 230, so I wanted to explain what it is, and go a little further into a recent opinion Clarence Thomas gave into the Trump twitter court case. I also talk a bit here about gatekeeping and right to association and explains how that plays a part of 230. I also explain the problems behind claiming 230 needs to go, and why it'd effectively be the death of the internet if we did it. USA Today Fact Check: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/04/08/fact-check-post-misrepresents-justice-thomas-section-230/7122886002/ Clarence Thomas Concurring Opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf Cornell Law on Section 230: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Kommentarer

0

Vær den første til at kommentere

Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af The Son Of Liberty Podcast-fællesskabet!

Kom i gang

1 måned kun 9 kr.

Derefter 99 kr. / måned · Opsig når som helst

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle episoder

5 episoder

Billede af episoden Episode 3: Clarence Thomas, Section 230, and Free Speech Online

Episode 3: Clarence Thomas, Section 230, and Free Speech Online

Today, I'm talking about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act passed in 1996. A lot of contention is going around about 230, so I wanted to explain what it is, and go a little further into a recent opinion Clarence Thomas gave into the Trump twitter court case. I also talk a bit here about gatekeeping and right to association and explains how that plays a part of 230. I also explain the problems behind claiming 230 needs to go, and why it'd effectively be the death of the internet if we did it. USA Today Fact Check: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/04/08/fact-check-post-misrepresents-justice-thomas-section-230/7122886002/ Clarence Thomas Concurring Opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf Cornell Law on Section 230: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

9. apr. 202158 min