West Deal Torah Center
Rabbi Ike Hanon hosts classes Monday through Friday at 6:10 AM at West Deal Shul. This class continues the Gemara in Pesachim 43a-43b, focusing on a dispute between Rav Nachman and Rav Yehuda over whether the Mishna's author is Rabbi Eliezer or Rabbi Meir. Each Amora constructs a kal v'chomer to support their position, and the tie is ultimately broken by a Beraita which demonstrates that Rabbi Meir — not Rabbi Eliezer — is the one who addresses the bigger chiddush of hametz nukshah (spoiled hametz) as a lav. The Gemara then explores where Rabbi Eliezer derives the prohibition against eating a hametz mixture, navigating three distinct pesukim about hametz and karet and carefully distinguishing their separate teachings. One pasuk is shown to include hametz that was leavened by an outside agent, and another is used to include women in the prohibition against eating hametz. Finally, the Gemara concludes that women's obligation to eat matza on a Torah level flows directly from their inclusion in the prohibition against hametz, making their obligation equivalent to men's despite matza being a time-bound positive commandment. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (0:00) Machlokes: Who authored the Mishna? (1:26) Breaking the tie between Amoraim (3:37) Beraita supports Rav Yehuda (7:07) Why the Beraita points to Rabbi Meir (9:43) Rabbi Eliezer's source for mixture lav (10:09) Challenge: Maybe mixture warrants karet (11:56) Third pasuk: hametz via outside agent (14:27) Gemara redirects to the word "kol" (17:53) Women's obligation in hametz prohibition (19:35) Why women might have been exempt (20:46) Women's obligation in eating matza (22:08) Rabbi Elazar's proof for women and matza (23:46) Sukkot comparison and women in miracles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visit: westdealshul.org Sponsorships: west.deal.classes@gmail.com
184 episoder
Kommentarer
0Vær den første til at kommentere
Tilmeld dig nu og bliv en del af West Deal Torah Center-fællesskabet!