How Eleanor Roosevelt And JFK Turned Conflict Into Partnership

Lore of the Founding- An Introduction

America’s founding didn’t spring from a blank page. It grew out of a loud, messy argument that had been running for centuries about how people should govern themselves, and Joanna Kenty helps us follow that argument back to its classical roots. We talk with Joanna, a former classics professor and civic education writer, about what “classical history” actually means beyond “great books.” She maps the Greek and Latin-speaking Mediterranean world, the timelines most people mean when they say “the classics,” and why certain authors like Plato, Sophocles, Cicero, and Virgil still feel provocative thousands of years later. From there, we zoom in on 18th-century America, where Latin study and Greco-Roman references were common, visible in mottos, coins, and a culture that constantly borrowed symbols like Liberty and Columbia to explain what the new republic hoped to become. Then we dig into the founders’ political education: why Athens mattered as an early democracy, why it also terrified later thinkers, and why the Roman Republic often became the more practical model for stability, offices, and restraint. Joanna also explains the historical accident that shaped the curriculum for generations: the West kept Latin while Greek became harder to access until the Renaissance. Along the way, we point teachers and curious readers to foundational sources, including John Adams’s love of Cicero, and we connect ideas to physical space through Jefferson’s neoclassical architecture at Monticello and the University of Virginia. If you care about the US Constitution, civic education, the Federalist Papers, or why Washington, DC looks the way it does, this conversation gives you a clearer origin story. Subscribe for the rest of the series, share this with a history-loving friend, and leave a review with your take: which ancient lesson feels most urgent right now? Subscribe to the Renovator. [https://therenovator.substack.com/] Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

The War Powers Act Explained

The Constitution draws a bright line that most of us never hear clearly: Congress declares war, and the President commands the military. So why does modern American conflict so often start without a formal declaration, and why does the “commander in chief” argument keep winning in practice? We sit down with Dr. Sean Beienberg to unpack the War Powers Act, also known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973, and the long tug-of-war over constitutional war powers. We connect the founding debates in Federalist 69, Pacificus, and Helvidius to the Civil War-era Prize Cases, where the Court recognizes defensive presidential action while still rejecting the idea that one person should decide to move the nation from peace to war. From there, we track how authorizations for use of military force (AUMFs) become the modern workaround, and how Korea and Vietnam reshape expectations about what “counts” as war. The most sobering part is enforcement. Courts largely treat these fights as political questions, meaning they won’t order troops home, and Congress is left with blunt tools like funding cuts that are politically risky. We also dig into how the 2011 Office of Legal Counsel Libya memo broadens the modern theory of presidential power by narrowing what qualifies as “real war” and expanding what qualifies as a U.S. interest. The result is a War Powers framework that exists on paper, but often feels hollow in real time. If you care about separation of powers, checks and balances, and how U.S. military force gets authorized, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves civics, and leave a review with your take: should Congress reclaim the war power, or has the presidency already absorbed it? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

How Primaries Pick Candidates And Reshape Elections

Primaries decide far more than most voters think and the process that was supposed to make politics cleaner may be one reason it feels uglier. We sit down with Dr. Sean Beienberg to unpack what primary elections actually are, why they took off in the early 20th century, and how they replaced the old convention system where party leaders and delegates negotiated nominees behind closed doors. If you’ve ever heard “smoke-filled room” and assumed the cure was obvious, this conversation adds the missing context: those insiders were often obsessed with one boring metric that mattered a lot, picking someone who could win. We walk through how primaries and caucuses work today, including the difference between open primaries and closed primaries, and why low primary turnout gives a small slice of voters outsized power. Then we dig into the central irony: instead of producing more moderate, broadly responsive candidates, modern primaries can reward people who are more extreme in style and less willing to compromise. Dr. Bienberg connects the dots between nomination incentives, campaign finance rules that weaken party organizations, small-dollar fundraising pressure, and the way cable news and social media can turn outrage into strategy. We also zoom out to the larger election ecosystem: gerrymandering and “safe” districts can make the primary the most dangerous election for many officials, which shifts their focus from governing to surviving the next nomination fight. We close by revisiting why conventions used to be unpredictable and substantive, and why they’re mostly spectacle now. If you want to understand polarization, party power, and why Congress struggles, start here, then check your state’s primary rules and vote. Subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review with your take on whether primaries help or hurt democracy. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

The Senate Filibuster Explained

The filibuster gets treated like an ancient feature of the U.S. Senate, but the version that drives today’s gridlock is surprisingly modern. We sit down with Dr. Sean Beienberg to unpack how a procedure that’s not even named in the Constitution ends up acting like a standing 60-vote requirement for most legislation. We start with the basics: what a filibuster is, what it is supposed to do, and why the classic image of someone heroically talking for hours is more myth than daily reality. From Aaron Burr’s rule change that helped create unlimited debate to the Senate’s 1917 cloture rule, the story is really about Senate procedure and incentives. Then we hit the turning point: two-tracking in the 1970s, when the Senate began treating an intent to filibuster as enough, dramatically lowering the cost of obstruction and sending filibuster use through the roof. From there, we follow the consequences. Why can the budget move when other bills cannot? How did fights over executive branch nominees and judicial nominations escalate from up-or-down votes into procedural warfare, with ripple effects that shape Supreme Court confirmations? We also explore the argument that the filibuster may be constitutionally suspect because the Constitution calls for supermajorities only in specific situations, plus realistic reform ideas like ending two-tracking or forcing debate to actually happen. If you’ve ever wondered why “just pass a bill” is rarely that simple in Congress, this conversation connects the dots. Subscribe for more clear, practical civics, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review with your take: should the Senate keep the filibuster, restore the talking filibuster, or scrap it entirely? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]

Mary Todd Lincoln Unmasked

Mary Todd Lincoln gets talked about like a stereotype: the spender, the problem, the punchline. That story falls apart the moment you place her where she actually lived, in a White House worn down by constant crowds and a nation tearing itself apart in the Civil War. We sit down with Vicky Middleswarth, Education Coordinator at the Mary Todd Lincoln House, to look at what Mary did, why she did it, and why so many people were determined to read her choices as personal failures instead of the messy reality of being First Lady during America’s greatest crisis. We dig into the controversies that followed her from the start: the White House renovation that ran over budget, the new wallpaper, carpets, and china, and the fierce backlash to entertaining while soldiers were fighting and dying. You’ll hear how hosting was not “extra” in the 1860s, but part of the job, and how Mary’s efforts to project dignity and sophistication became a political liability. The episode also explores her civic participation and political involvement before women’s suffrage, from advising and letter writing to fundraising at sanitary fairs and quietly visiting Union Army hospitals with fruit, flowers, and conversation. Then we zoom out and ask a harder question: how did Americans learn to “know” Mary Todd Lincoln in the first place? We unpack how diaries, letters, memoirs, and interviews, many written by men with their own agendas, shaped a lasting public image, and why modern historians keep revisiting her story. Finally, we talk about what visitors experience at the Mary Todd Lincoln House, including a mourning bonnet that captures her resilience and an interactive unit that examines the infamous 1875 insanity trial from multiple perspectives. If you care about women’s history, Civil War history, the First Lady role, or how bias gets baked into the historical record, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves American history, and leave a review with your take: what’s the fairest way to judge Mary Todd Lincoln? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum [https://civics.asu.edu/civic-literacy-curriculum]! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership [https://scetl.asu.edu/] Center for American Civics [https://civics.asu.edu/]