The cyclingtraining’s Podcast

Zone 2 Training vs. Sweet Spot: The 2026 Cycling Debate Guide

5 min · 27. apr. 2026
episode Zone 2 Training vs. Sweet Spot: The 2026 Cycling Debate Guide cover

Description

Is polarized training better than sweet spot in 2026? The best training intensity distribution (TID) depends entirely on your weekly volume. Recent 2025-2026 research suggests that while Polarized training (80/20) excels for high-volume athletes (12+ hours), Pyramidal models utilizing Sweet Spot are often more effective for those training under 8 hours per week.  Full article 👇 https://www.pacelinebikes.com/zone-2-training-vs-sweet-spot-the-2026-cycling-debate-guide/https://www.pacelinebikes.com/zone-2-training-vs-sweet-spot-the-2026-cycling-debate-guide/ [https://www.pacelinebikes.com/zone-2-training-vs-sweet-spot-the-2026-cycling-debate-guide/]

Comments

0

Be the first to comment

Sign up now and become a member of the The cyclingtraining’s Podcast community!

Get Started

1 month for 9 kr.

Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

All episodes

55 episodes

episode FTP in Cycling: How It Compares to Critical Power artwork

FTP in Cycling: How It Compares to Critical Power

FTP in cycling is the highest average power you can hold for about 60 minutes, and it’s the number most training plans use to set your zones. Critical Power (CP) is a related but more precise metric, built from several maximal efforts instead of one. For most riders, FTP is the practical day-to-day tool — CP is the deeper layer you reach for once FTP stops telling you enough. Deep dive article here: 👇 https://pacelinebikes.com/ftp-in-cycling-how-it-compares-to-critical-power/ [https://pacelinebikes.com/ftp-in-cycling-how-it-compares-to-critical-power/] Take the quiz and receive your free FTP training plan! 👇 https://functionalthresholdpower.com/how-to-improve-ftp/ [https://functionalthresholdpower.com/how-to-improve-ftp/]

Yesterday5 min