Behind the Slides

Episode 3: Manni Mohyuddin, MBBS

54 min · 30. huhti 2026
jakson Episode 3: Manni Mohyuddin, MBBS kansikuva

Kuvaus

Episode 003 — Manni Mohyuddin, MD Why does so much clinical research never make it to publication—and what does that mean for the evidence we trust? In this episode of Behind the Slides, we sit down with Manni Mohyuddin to examine how incentives shape the research ecosystem. We discuss the gap between conference abstracts and eventual publication, what gets published (and what doesn’t), and how these dynamics influence the evidence base that clinicians rely on. A conversation about bias, incentives, and how research becomes “truth” in medicine.

Kommentit

0

Ole ensimmäinen kommentoija

Rekisteröidy nyt ja liity Behind the Slides-yhteisöön!

Aloita maksutta

14 vrk ilmainen kokeilu

Kokeilun jälkeen 7,99 € / kuukausi. · Peru milloin tahansa.

  • Podimon podcastit
  • 20 kuunteluaikaa / kuukausi
  • Lataa offline-käyttöön

Kaikki jaksot

4 jaksot

jakson Adam Mastroianni: Episode 004 kansikuva

Adam Mastroianni: Episode 004

In this episode of Behind the Slides, Scott Matson sits down with Adam Mastroianni to explore the incentives, institutions, and hidden cultures that shape modern science. Using Adam’s widely discussed essays on scientific publishing, peer review, and the replication crisis as a starting point, the conversation expands into a broader discussion about how scientific systems reward productivity, novelty, and institutional survival—and whether those incentives are compatible with genuine discovery. Topics include: * Why scientific publishing may function more like a prestige economy than a truth-seeking system * The tension between transformational ideas and peer review * Whether NIH-style funding structures inherently favor incrementalism * Science as a “strong-link problem” and concerns about the future pipeline of creative scientists * The apprenticeship nature of scientific training and Adam’s “crock pot” analogy for how scientific culture is absorbed * Why labs may unintentionally reproduce both epistemic virtues and epistemic pathologies * The replication crisis, publication bias, and the incentives surrounding positive findings * Whether modern academia still attracts highly agentic, unconventional thinkers * What kinds of scientific environments actually produce original and rigorous scientists Rather than treating science as a purely rational machine, the discussion examines it as a deeply human system shaped by psychology, incentives, identity, prestige, and culture. Experimental History by Adam Mastroianni: https://www.experimental-history.com [https://www.experimental-history.com/]

14. touko 202655 min