Jury Trial

Opening With Intent

1 h 6 min · 2. kesä 2026
jakson Opening With Intent kansikuva

Kuvaus

In this episode, we're joined by Sharif Gray and Gray Broughton of Broughton Injury Law [https://graybroughton.com/about-us/], a veteran-owned plaintiff's firm based in Virginia where every trial lawyer is a former military officer. Known for taking on the cases other firms won't touch, they recently secured a $20 million verdict for a 13-year-old boy abused at a psychiatric residential facility — a case with no economic damages, no traditional experts, and three prior law firm rejections. We dig into the full arc of how that case was built and tried, with a deep focus on opening statement: their four-question framework for case framing, why opening is where trials are won or lost, how focus groups shaped their theory of institutional betrayal, turning bad facts into assets rather than running from them, the team approach to preparation. 📺 Referenced in this episode: Herbert Stern – The Importance of the Opening Statement [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaA_URRKBlg] Learn more at graybroughton.com [http://graybroughton.com]

Kommentit

0

Ole ensimmäinen kommentoija

Rekisteröidy nyt ja liity Jury Trial-yhteisöön!

Aloita maksutta

14 vrk ilmainen kokeilu

Kokeilun jälkeen 7,99 € / kuukausi. · Peru milloin tahansa.

  • Podimon podcastit
  • 20 kuunteluaikaa / kuukausi
  • Lataa offline-käyttöön

Kaikki jaksot

5 jaksot

jakson Opening With Intent kansikuva

Opening With Intent

In this episode, we're joined by Sharif Gray and Gray Broughton of Broughton Injury Law [https://graybroughton.com/about-us/], a veteran-owned plaintiff's firm based in Virginia where every trial lawyer is a former military officer. Known for taking on the cases other firms won't touch, they recently secured a $20 million verdict for a 13-year-old boy abused at a psychiatric residential facility — a case with no economic damages, no traditional experts, and three prior law firm rejections. We dig into the full arc of how that case was built and tried, with a deep focus on opening statement: their four-question framework for case framing, why opening is where trials are won or lost, how focus groups shaped their theory of institutional betrayal, turning bad facts into assets rather than running from them, the team approach to preparation. 📺 Referenced in this episode: Herbert Stern – The Importance of the Opening Statement [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaA_URRKBlg] Learn more at graybroughton.com [http://graybroughton.com]

2. kesä 20261 h 6 min
jakson Voice Wins Verdicts kansikuva

Voice Wins Verdicts

In this episode, we’re joined by Kristi Foster, founder of Foster Voice Studio and a nationally recognized vocal coach for trial attorneys, to break down why delivery can make or break your case. With a background in theater and performance, Kristi now works with high-stakes communicators to help lawyers connect with juries in a way that actually drives verdicts. We dive into how jurors process information, the concept of emotional currency, the difference between teaching and storytelling in opening statement, and why breath control, vocal range, pacing, and intentional pauses are critical tools in trial prep. If you’ve focused heavily on substance but haven’t trained your voice, this conversation will challenge how you think about persuasion in the courtroom. Learn more about Kristi’s work at www.fostervoicestudio.com [https://www.fostervoicestudio.com/]

3. maalis 20261 h 8 min