The Proving Ground

Spreading Democracy | The Proving Ground Ep. 4

21 min · 1. heinä 2019
jakson Spreading Democracy | The Proving Ground Ep. 4 kansikuva

Kuvaus

Should the United States spread democracy abroad? Is it any of our business? Jacob and Richie dive into the best and worst arguments on either side. Show Notes: Worst Pro-Spreading Arguments Jacob: It worked in Germany and Japan (Availability bias) Richie: Freedom is the cry of every human heart (False premise) Worst Anti-Spreading Arguments: Jacob: Military Industrial Complex, warmongerers (Ad hominem) Richie: What happens abroad doesn't affect us (Begs the question) Best Pro-Spreading Arguments: Jacob: There has never been war between two democracies Richie: America is better off in a freer world Best Anti-Spreading Arguments: Jacob: State's duty to its own people Richie: Forced democracy is antithetical to freedom

Kommentit

0

Ole ensimmäinen kommentoija

Rekisteröidy nyt ja liity The Proving Ground-yhteisöön!

Aloita nyt

3 kuukautta hintaan 7,99 €

Sitten 7,99 € / kuukausi · Peru milloin tahansa.

  • Podimon podcastit
  • 20 kuunteluaikaa / kuukausi
  • Lataa offline-käyttöön

Kaikki jaksot

6 jaksot

jakson Social Media Regulation | The Proving Ground Ep. 3 kansikuva

Social Media Regulation | The Proving Ground Ep. 3

Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and other tech giants are operating somewhere between the space of a platform and a publisher, censoring some viewpoints and favoring others. Should the government step in to protect speech, or should we let the free market run its course? Here are the best and worst arguments on each side. Show Notes: https://www.businessinsider.com/steven-crowder-youtube-channel-demonetized-2019-6 Worst Pro-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: The First Amendment says I can say what I want (false premise) Richie: Censorship violates freedom of speech and association (false premise) Worst Anti-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: Just don't say offensive things (begs the question, proves too much) Richie: They're only censoring the most extreme (false premise, potential slippery slope in response) Best Pro-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: Those who have been censored can sue for defamation Richie: Big tech has too much power and should be forced to choose whether it is a platform or a publisher Best Anti-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: You have no right to a platform Richie: Private companies can do whatever they want as long as they don't breach contracts

24. kesä 201929 min
jakson The Electoral College | The Proving Ground Ep. 2 kansikuva

The Electoral College | The Proving Ground Ep. 2

Jacob and Richie dissect the best and worst arguments surrounding the infamous Electoral College. The president-elect has only lost the popular vote five times in 230 years, but two of those have been in the last 20 years. Keep it, abolish it, or reform it? You decide. Show Notes: https://ballotpedia.org/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact [https://ballotpedia.org/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact] https://history.house.gov/Institution/Electoral-College/Electoral-College/ [https://history.house.gov/Institution/Electoral-College/Electoral-College/] Worst Pro-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: The Founders were wise men (appeal to authority) Richie: The Constitution says so (appeal to tradition) Worst Anti-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: The Founding Fathers were racists and the Electoral College is a racist system of oppression (ad hominem) Richie: The Electoral College is undemocratic (false premise) Best Pro-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: Provides a check on democracy Richie: President of the UNITED States, 51 separate elections Best Anti-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: Not representative -- small states have too much power Richie: Not representative -- points not awarded by district

17. kesä 201924 min