The Talk Genealogy Podcast
Village Cricket and Family History
Kuvaus
Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/64595/fan_mail/new] Evening, all. Hope it's a pleasant evening where you are and that your family history research is going well. I've been doing a bit of D-Day research recently — I'm not a military historian, it's not my thing at all, so I've learned quite a little bit. But tonight we're going to listen to village cricket. You know, the game where the bowler is definitely aiming for the man. The Talk Genealogy podcast looks at different techniques and interesting sources for family historians, or perhaps a discussion about early genealogists, the pioneers of our science. Sometimes we look at how a famous character in history shows us something particular about genealogy. But hey, most of the time we talk about whatever comes into our head — building an audio library for genealogists with too much time on their hands. Please remember, I'm not an expert or a professional. I'm an enthusiast like you, who has spent more than 40 years digging up his family tree, so often in the wrong place. These episodes are really no more than me sharing with you what I have learned along the way, and I do want to emphasise that I am talking about ancestor hunting in England. Onto the Village Green We're going to step onto the village green — not to talk about test matches or county legends, not to celebrate the great names of county cricket or the professional game, but to look at something far more intimate, far more revealing for family historians: the genealogical value of old village cricket. This is an episode about the cricket of our ancestors. The cricket played on rough commons behind the church, or on borrowed fields, or on the edge of the village where the land was flat enough to risk a straight wall. It's about cricket that belonged to the people long before the professionals arrived. And it's about those fragile, often overlooked records that can illuminate the lives, relationships and social worlds of the families we like to study. Tonight's Quiz A bit of a mix this week. Three questions — stay tuned for the answers at the end of the episode. 1. What is a hair twister? 2. What do we mean when we say a keening funeral? 3. What do we mean by terminus post quem? The World Before the Rulebook Before we get into the sources, we need to understand the world we're dealing with. When we talk of village cricket before the mid-19th century, we're not talking about the structured, codified game we know today. We're talking about something looser, more organic, and deeply rooted in local custom. Underpinning the whole thing was money — staked or gambled on each match. Yes, even at this level. And to make the betting more attractive, one side might be allowed in advance to bat twice, or to import a skilled player from another village. Rules could almost be made up on the run. Cricket in the 18th and 19th centuries was a village pastime, played by labourers, farmers, tradesmen and occasionally — occasionally — the local squire, though the church and the squirearchy generally found it a bit too vulgar to take part in themselves. Matches were arranged informally, sometimes on the spur of the moment, sometimes as part of a feast day or a fair. There were no leagues, no county boards, no fixture lists pinned on the pavilion wall — because there was no pavilion. This matters enormously for genealogists, because it explains why early cricket records are so scarce. The game existed and it was popular, but it left very little paper behind. A match might be remembered in the pub for years, but unless someone wrote it down and kept the paper, it more or less vanished. Fortunately, so much pride — and so much money — was at stake that entries were sometimes made in parish journals. This is why we must resist the temptation to begin with the histories of professional cricket. Books like The History of Cricket in Hampshire or similar county studies are valuable in their own right, but they belong to a different world — the story of the professional game, the county game, the game of the gentleman and the groundsman. Our story is older, rougher, and much closer to the ground. A Family Story: Samuel the Umpire Cricket does crop up in some of the books I've written about my own family history, so I thought I'd read a couple of extracts to illustrate tonight's talk. Samuel G. umpired a cricket match between Radcliffe Juniors and Bingham Juniors in 1864. That was his first mistake — volunteering to be an umpire — because the sports report in the Nottingham Guardian declared the match a draw "from the stupidity of the Radcliffe umpire, who, being only nine parts of a man, knew more about making breeches than the laws of cricket." Samuel was a tailor, and he replied in kind, arguing that the correspondent's own ignorance was showing, since — as he pointed out — tailors could boast among their number the name of Fuller. A bit of digging turned up who he meant: Fuller Pilch, a well-known batsman who developed a new style of striking the ball, and who had indeed trained as a tailor. 1860: The Turning Point Something did change around 1860. It didn't happen overnight, but the pattern was unmistakable. A new sporting elite begins to appear in village cricket — men who bring structure, ambition and paperwork. Who were they? Often the university-educated clergy, schoolmasters, young professionals, and sons of gentry who had played cricket at their college or in town clubs. These men arrived in the village with a sense of how cricket ought to be played. They standardised the rules. Regular fixtures, club committees and subscription lists suddenly appeared. They wrote minutes, kept scorecards, even ordered printed posters for matches, and corresponded with neighbouring villages to arrange home and away fixtures. Suddenly, the paper trail begins. This changed the rustic game forever — and for genealogists, this is the turning point. Before about 1860, cricket records are rare and accidental. After 1860, they become far more systematic — not universal, not complete, but far, far more likely to survive. This shift also changes the social meaning of cricket. It becomes a marker of respectability, a sign of community organisation, and a way for the village to present itself to the outside world. And that means more names, more roles, more records. (A quick aside from the podcast: if you're interested in whether your family appeared in paintings or images before photography — before, say, 1860 — that's the subject of the current blog post over at talkgenealogy.com.) The Newspapers: A Genealogist's Delight Before photography, before printed scorecards, before clubs kept proper archives — before there were any clubs at all — cricket ephemera was, and is, astonishingly rare. Villages tended to have their own scorer, but when he moved away or died, the papers often went with him. From 1800 onwards, newspapers become a primary source for village cricket, and they are astonishingly rich in detail. Why? Because cricket was village news — it was entertainment, it was a social event, and weekly newspapers needed copy. A typical match report for a village might include full team lists, batting and bowling figures, the names of umpires and scorers, who provided the tea, who donated the prize — and, more often than you might think, who fell out over an umpiring decision. Here's a longer example that captures the atmosphere well. In 1820, someone wrote to the paper: "Mr. Editor, in your last paper, a paragraph from Bingham professing to give your readers an account of the late cricket match between Grantham and Bingham, informs us that a slight altercation took place as to whether one of the two first Bingham players was caught... the Grantham umpire, with whom the decision lay, by the batter's sudden turning round could not distinguish the catch, having considerable bets depending upon the issue of this match..." Things got a little heated. The reporter replied that he had "not the leisure to answer the interrogatories of a nameless intruder," and that the correspondent, for the sake of his "very considerable bets," should apply to the secretary of the Grantham Cricket Club for the information he required. At that point, the editor closed the correspondence. Even the most light-hearted matches — married men versus single men, young against old, "our youngsters against your youngsters" — were reported with enthusiasm. And then there are the correspondence columns: disputes about umpiring, complaints about a village team's reputation for unsporting behaviour, accusations of unfair play, defences of local honour, even arguments about who should have been selected. These letters reveal relationships, alliances and rivalries that never appear in official records. They show who stood up for whom, who wrote well, who wrote angrily, and who was respected enough to have their letter printed. For genealogists, this is social texture — the kind of detail that brings families to life. The People Behind the Players One of the most overlooked aspects of village cricket is the role of the non-player: the committees, the supporters, the women who made it work. Cricket teams were social institutions long before they were clubs. They organised summer fetes, harvest suppers, charity matches, even concerts and dances — and always, fundraising teas. Newspapers often recorded the names of the people, usually women, who decorated the Check out A Practical Introduction to Medieval Genealogy by Malcolm Noble
14 vrk ilmainen kokeilu
Kokeilun jälkeen 7,99 € / kuukausi. · Peru milloin tahansa.
- Podimon podcastit
- 20 kuunteluaikaa / kuukausi
- Lataa offline-käyttöön
Kaikki jaksot
8 jaksot
Kommentit
0Ole ensimmäinen kommentoija
Rekisteröidy nyt ja liity The Talk Genealogy Podcast-yhteisöön!