West Deal Torah Center
Rabbi Joseph Dana hosts classes every day at 6:50 AM at West Deal Shul. The class picks up from the previous session's discussion of Ba'al Keri — the laws governing one who has had a seminal emission — and the question of whether immersion in a mikveh is required before prayer and Torah study. Rashi explains that when the Gemara says 'Hilcheta,' it is referring only to those who still observe the stringency, while the practical ruling follows Yehuda ben Betera, who holds that Torah cannot become impure and therefore no immersion is required at all. Tosafot is then analyzed, with the Ri ruling that there is no distinction between Torah learning and prayer — neither requires immersion. The Rambam is brought to show the historical progression of the decree: originally instituted by Ezra for Torah study, later extended to prayer by a subsequent Beit Din, and ultimately repealed because it never spread to the entire Jewish people. The class closes by raising a pointed question about the Shulchan Aruch: why does Maran cite only the Rambam's reason for the decree — discouraging overly frequent relations among scholars — while omitting the Tur's reason, that Torah must be approached with seriousness and gravity rather than lightheadedness? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (0:00) Recap: Ba'al Keri & Mikveh rules (1:19) Rashi resolves the Hilcheta issue (4:22) Tosafot on Ba'al Keri ruling (6:58) Debate: Torah vs. Tefillah immersion (9:16) Rambam: Hilchot Tefillah (12:10) Why the decree was repealed (15:40) Sephardic custom re: Ba'al Keri (17:03) Shulchan Aruch & Mishnah Berurah (22:48) Two reasons for the Ba'al Keri decree (24:05) Why Maran quotes only Rambam's reason - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visit: westdealshul.org Sponsorships: west.deal.classes@gmail.com
217 jaksot
Kommentit
0Ole ensimmäinen kommentoija
Rekisteröidy nyt ja liity West Deal Torah Center-yhteisöön!