ZERO SHOT - AI & Business. Anti-Hype.
How do you tell the difference between a task worth handing to AI and one that should stay human? In Episode 25 of Zero Shot [https://zeroshot.com.au/] , James Gauci [https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesrgauci/] and Llew Jury [https://www.linkedin.com/in/llewjury/] tackle the decision most businesses get wrong: choosing what to actually point AI at. The instinct is to reach for the shiny, visible task: customer service, the website, email, but that is rarely where the value lives. This episode gives you a practical way to sort any task in your business into three piles: hand it to AI, keep it human, or a bit of both. Five fast triggers to spot the real candidates, seven questions to run each one through, and an honest look at the cost of automating the wrong thing. Key Highlights * Why your gut instinct to automate is usually the wrong target * Automating a broken process just makes bad permanent, faster * Failed early automations burn organizational trust and kill momentum * The five triggers: repeat, sentence, dread, messy input, apology * Let the AI do the dread work, not just the grunt work * Seven questions that separate worth it from should we * In regulated sectors, accountability is the governance question that matters * The should conversation is where the real value lives Tools and Frameworks Mentioned * Claude Fable [https://claude.ai] - Anthropic's high-capability model, restored last week in a stripped-back format outside the US, referenced for producing report and website work that would take an analyst weeks. * Gemma 4 (Google DeepMind) [https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemma] - Google's open source model, cited as the kind of on-hardware model deployed in high-classification defense settings where public models are not permitted. * The REWIRE Framework (Advancer) [https://advancer.com.au] - Advancer's method for AI transition, moving through Reveal, Envision, and Weave to test viability and feasibility before building. * System 1 and System 2 Thinking [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow] - Daniel Kahneman's model, referenced by James to frame when to let AI steer a fast call versus when deep human judgment is required. Connect with the Hosts: * James Gauci: [https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesrgauci/] CEO of Cadent. * Llew Jury: [https://www.linkedin.com/in/llewjury/] Managing Director of Advancer at the AI Agency. * Zero Shot: [https://zeroshot.com.au/] Follow us on LinkedIn for clarity in a complex landscape. 🤠 Sponsor: This episode is brought to you by Prompt Cowboy [https://www.promptcowboy.ai/], the agentic prompting tool that helps teams build structured, precise prompts before they hit whichever model they are using. Head to promptcowboy.ai and stop leaving results on the table. Produced by Yennia La Rotta [https://www.linkedin.com/in/zarich-la-rotta/].⚡
25 jaksot
Kommentit
0Ole ensimmäinen kommentoija
Rekisteröidy nyt ja liity ZERO SHOT - AI & Business. Anti-Hype.-yhteisöön!