Behind the Slides

Episode 1: Adam Cifu

1 h 10 min · 16 de abr de 2026
portada del episodio Episode 1: Adam Cifu

Descripción

What does it actually mean to practice evidence-based medicine? In this episode, we sit down with Adam Cifu to unpack the gap between clinical evidence and real-world decision making. We explore how data is interpreted at the bedside, why guidelines don’t always translate cleanly into practice, and what it takes to think clearly in the face of uncertainty. This is a conversation about judgment, tradeoffs, and the limits of evidence—core issues for anyone practicing or training in medicine today.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de Behind the Slides!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

4 episodios

episode Adam Mastroianni: Episode 004 artwork

Adam Mastroianni: Episode 004

In this episode of Behind the Slides, Scott Matson sits down with Adam Mastroianni to explore the incentives, institutions, and hidden cultures that shape modern science. Using Adam’s widely discussed essays on scientific publishing, peer review, and the replication crisis as a starting point, the conversation expands into a broader discussion about how scientific systems reward productivity, novelty, and institutional survival—and whether those incentives are compatible with genuine discovery. Topics include: * Why scientific publishing may function more like a prestige economy than a truth-seeking system * The tension between transformational ideas and peer review * Whether NIH-style funding structures inherently favor incrementalism * Science as a “strong-link problem” and concerns about the future pipeline of creative scientists * The apprenticeship nature of scientific training and Adam’s “crock pot” analogy for how scientific culture is absorbed * Why labs may unintentionally reproduce both epistemic virtues and epistemic pathologies * The replication crisis, publication bias, and the incentives surrounding positive findings * Whether modern academia still attracts highly agentic, unconventional thinkers * What kinds of scientific environments actually produce original and rigorous scientists Rather than treating science as a purely rational machine, the discussion examines it as a deeply human system shaped by psychology, incentives, identity, prestige, and culture. Experimental History by Adam Mastroianni: https://www.experimental-history.com [https://www.experimental-history.com/]

14 de may de 202655 min