Targeted by Design: Fred Hampton, COINTELPRO & the Black Panthers

Supreme Court Just Weakened the Voting Rights Act (Louisiana v. Callais Explained)

The Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map that created a second majority-Black district—and the bigger story is what Louisiana v. Callais signals about the future of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In this episode, Will breaks down the difference between “intent” and “results,” why redistricting is really a fight over power, and how “packing” and “cracking” can dilute Black voting strength. We also connect the dots to Alabama’s Allen v. Milligan—a modern example of the kind of representation Section 2 is supposed to protect. Question for you: Can “colorblind” rules ever produce fair outcomes in a country with a racial history?

Targeted by Design: Fred Hampton, COINTELPRO & the Black Panthers

Erased Blueprints: Fred Hampton (Targeted by Design)Fred Hampton was building the kind of community power the state couldn’t control—and COINTELPRO moved to stop it. In this episode, we unpack Hampton’s organizing, the Black Panther Party’s survival programs, and the COINTELPRO tactics designed to disrupt movements from the inside: surveillance, infiltration, disinformation, conflict-stoking, and criminalization. Then we talk about the final step—when the state tries to erase the builder and rewrite the story so nobody copies the blueprint. Pattern Breakers question: What’s one community program we need right now that would change everything? Subscribe on your favorite platforms: https://pod.link/1861495208

Silenced By Design: Billie Holiday

They didn’t fear Billie Holiday because she could sing. They feared her because she made America hear itself. This episode of Erased Blueprints breaks down how Strange Fruit became an accusation—and how the system responded the way it always does when the truth comes out unsoftened: surveil, criminalize, discredit, erase. Because when a Black woman tells the truth without shrinking it, power doesn’t debate the message. It attacks the messenger. In this breakdown, we trace how the U.S. government (and the machinery around it) treated Billie like a threat—not because of “scandal,” but because her art forced the country to look at what it wanted to keep offstage. THE QUESTION: What happens when a Black woman uses art to say what the country refuses to admit… and the government decides her truth is a threat?

Druski vs Erika Kirk... Whiteface: Did Druski go too far?

Did Druski cross the line—or did conservatives just experience satire as “violence” for the first time? On this episode of BLK by Design, I unpack the Druski skit the internet mapped onto Erika Kirk, the “whiteface/defamation/too far” backlash, and what this controversy reveals about selective outrage and the politics of respectability. We break down the real questions: * Who is satire for—and where’s the actual line? * Are we critiquing a private person, or a public political brand? * How does embarrassment get upgraded into “harm” to demand protection from critique? * Why Black humor gets framed as dangerous when it makes power look small

Amanda goes WEST without CIARA

West + Amanda went public. The internet went to court. And once again, the question became: “How does Ciara feel?”—and even worse, “Is she handling it the right way?” In this episode, we use the Summer House triangle (West, Amanda, Ciara) to unpack a familiar blueprint: disrespect toward Black women gets normalized, and then Black women get policed for their response—especially when the response is simply a boundary. We connect today’s fandom discourse to Malcolm X’s indictment: Black women are disrespected, unprotected, and neglected—then blamed for reacting.