21 Days vs 365: How a Stalking Victim Was Failed by California Courts

21 Days vs 365: How a Stalking Victim Was Failed by California Courts

In March 2025, Mindy Willens filed for a civil harassment restraining order against Anthony Robert D'Amato Jr. — a man who, according to court filings, had spent hours on livestream making death-coded threats, weaponizing the death of her sister, and directing his audience to intimidate her. California law promises a hearing within 21 days. It took over a year. In this episode, we trace the full timeline of Willens v. D'Amato — from the first continuance to a subpoena demanding her entire YouTube watch history, a hospital excuse for missing court and arrest warrant, and a final settlement that — despite its unconventional form — represents a hard-won and strategically sophisticated outcome. We also break down why the judge struck some of the enforcement provisions from the signed agreement, attempting to clarify misinformation about the agreement.

California's Mental Illness Defense - Lifeline or Loophole?

Treatment instead of trial. A sealed record if you comply. It's California's most empathetic criminal justice law — and possibly its most exploitable one. We investigate who it's helping, who's gaming it, and whether AB 46 can fix it.

The Subpoena Woodchipper

On March 11, 2026, ZeroDarkTony revived a familiar threat: subpoenas to unmask anonymous critics. He framed it as his “Sixth Amendment right” and claimed only guilty people would fear it. But the courts already tested that theory. In this episode of Hero Not Zero, Zoey and Cody rewind to the 2025 subpoena battle in Willens v. D’Amato, where sweeping information demands targeted non-party commentators and ZDT critics including Dodge Landesman, True Crime with Nora, Scientology Audit and HeroLightCody. With Mindy Willens and attorney Merritt McKeon pushing back, a motion to quash turned into a legal woodchipper—chewing up the subpoenas, exposing Tony’s own livestream threats, and ending in sanctions for ZDT's attorney Steven Tamer.

ZeroDarkTony's Erased History of Violence

What happens when a criminal case results in a conviction — and later vanishes from public search? In this episode, we review Los Angeles court records related to a 2018 domestic violence prosecution involving Anthony D’Amato, known online as ZeroDarkTony. Using sworn declarations and docket entries, we walk through the timeline of the case, the plea, the sentence, and the eventual "expungement" under California law. We also examine how expungement works, what remains visible to law enforcement, and what may not appear in common background checks. This episode is based entirely on verified sources, court filings, and public records.

The Gap - What the Record Doesn’t Show

We rely on background checks, credentials, and verified badges to tell us who is safe. A green checkmark. A clean record. But what happens when predatory behavior is erased or never makes it into the record at all? In this first episode of Context and Character, we examine the gap—the invisible space between who someone appears to be on paper and who they are in reality. We explore how institutions quietly manage risk, how misconduct is handled behind closed doors, and how the absence of records is often mistaken for proof of safety. This episode lays out the core framework of the series: why predatory behavior is rarely accidental, how information is systematically erased or fragmented, and why “clean backgrounds” can be dangerously misleading.