Corporate Underpants

e14 Dana Chisnell on Ballot Design, Civic UX, and the 2000 Election

42 min · 5 de may de 2026
portada del episodio e14 Dana Chisnell on Ballot Design, Civic UX, and the 2000 Election

Descripción

Dana Chisnell did not set out to work on elections. She was a freelance UX consultant doing work for Intuit and Cisco when she watched the 2000 election returns and thought, "this is an interesting design problem." That thought turned into a twenty-year arc through ballot design, federal government, and eventually a meeting with a sitting president. This is Part 1 of 2. Dana tells the story of the butterfly ballot, the gorgeous 350-page design guide that nobody could implement, and how a warmup presentation for Jared Spool led to an unexpected call from someone at the White House. The Corporate Underpants moments along the way are classics: great design that did not survive contact with the ecosystem, government websites that served the administrative process instead of the voter, and one very honest admission about not doing enough homework.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de Corporate Underpants!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

18 episodios

episode e15 Dr. Darren Hood On UX Maturity, Flying Cows, and Corporate Chaos artwork

e15 Dr. Darren Hood On UX Maturity, Flying Cows, and Corporate Chaos

At some point in a UX career, you realize the problem isn’t wireframes. It’s tornadoes. Dr. Darren Hood has spent decades inside organizations watching projects get blown sideways by politics, confusion, shifting priorities, low UX maturity, and executives changing direction halfway through the work. This conversation is about what senior UX work actually starts to look like once you stop focusing only on deliverables and start paying attention to organizational behavior. We talk about stakeholder maturity, managing up, AI adoption, why “UX is dead” discourse is exhausting, and the difference between having an opinion versus having enough experience to recognize patterns. A lot of senior UX work isn’t designing interfaces. It’s learning how to function inside chaos without becoming part of it. Key Topics * UX maturity beyond organizational models * Why senior UX work becomes political * The difference between opinion and expert opinion * How experienced practitioners are approaching AI * Managing stakeholder chaos and “seagull management” * Why experienced UX people stop complaining and start reframing problems

26 de may de 20261 h 8 min
episode e14 Dana Chisnell on Ballot Design, Civic UX, and the 2000 Election artwork

e14 Dana Chisnell on Ballot Design, Civic UX, and the 2000 Election

Dana Chisnell did not set out to work on elections. She was a freelance UX consultant doing work for Intuit and Cisco when she watched the 2000 election returns and thought, "this is an interesting design problem." That thought turned into a twenty-year arc through ballot design, federal government, and eventually a meeting with a sitting president. This is Part 1 of 2. Dana tells the story of the butterfly ballot, the gorgeous 350-page design guide that nobody could implement, and how a warmup presentation for Jared Spool led to an unexpected call from someone at the White House. The Corporate Underpants moments along the way are classics: great design that did not survive contact with the ecosystem, government websites that served the administrative process instead of the voter, and one very honest admission about not doing enough homework.

5 de may de 202642 min
episode E12 Part 2 Josh Dulberger On Running An AI Product Lab artwork

E12 Part 2 Josh Dulberger On Running An AI Product Lab

Seven months after Part 1 of my conversation with Josh Dulberger, the energy around AI hadn’t disappeared. But it had changed. Josh had left Zoom, joined a startup, watched it get acquired, and then stepped into running an internal AI product lab. Now the question wasn’t what could we do. It was what’s actually worth building. The work sounds exciting from the outside. Inside, it’s a lot of small experiments, dead ends, and decisions to stop. Teams build quickly. Test quickly. Most ideas don’t go anywhere. That’s the point. This is what happens after the initial wave. When the organization has to turn possibility into something real. Key Topics * What an internal AI product lab actually does * Running fast experiments with small teams * Why most ideas don’t make it * Deciding what not to build * What companies are actually looking for now

24 de mar de 202622 min