The Blueprint Versus Reality of EU-INC

The Blueprint Versus Reality of EU-INC

The European Commission just released its official EU-INC. proposal. Here is what founders actually got. This episode compares the original EU-INC proposal with the European Commission's long-awaited regulation for a pan-European corporate entity. We go clause by clause to find the wins, the compromises, and the open questions. In this episode: * Why the EC chose to build on top of BRIS instead of creating a new EU registry, and what that means for legal certainty * How the 48-hour, 100-euro incorporation cap works, and what happens when national notaries push back * The once-only principle and how it eliminates the paperwork loop across 27 member states * Why the EC harmonized ESOP taxation but explicitly refused to touch corporate tax rates or labor co-determination rules * The new six-month simplified insolvency proceeding and the pan-European asset auction system built to support it If you are a founder deciding where to incorporate, you need to hear this before you open a Delaware account. If you are an investor deploying capital in Europe, you must understand what "EU Inc." will and will not standardize. If you are a policymaker or legal professional, you should study how this regulation navigates the limits of Article 114. Learn more about the official EU Inc. regulation here: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_614

Breaking Down the European Commission's Leaked Proposal: What It Got Right, Wrong, and Missed Entirely

The European Commission 28th regime draft proposal got leaked. So we analyzed it and compared it with the original EU-INC policy proposal. The EU-INC initiative gave the EC a clear, uncompromising roadmap for a 28th regime that could genuinely rival Delaware. Then the EC implemented its own version, compromising on the most critical parts. In this episode we compare the gaps and tell you everything you need to know about where European startup policy actually stands. What we cover: * What the EC got right: zero capital requirements, shares without nominal value, and SAFEs finally working in Europe * The ESOP compromise: dry taxation is gone, but capital gains treatment is still fragmented across 27 member states * Article 12 and the board governance trap: how deferring to national law creates a race to the bottom * The missing court: why no unified dispute resolution system means institutional investors will keep forcing European founders to flip to Delaware * Whether a truly frictionless European startup ecosystem is even legally achievable without rewriting the foundations of the EU itself The blueprint asked for a house. The EC approved the kitchen and removed the roof. Learn more about EU-INC here: https://www.eu-inc.org [https://www.eu-inc.org]

Inside the EU-INC Proposal: A Deep Dive into the 28th Regime

Europe's startup problem isn't talent, capital, or ideas. It's paperwork. Europe's startup ecosystem is suffocating under 27 different national regulatory frameworks. The EU-INC initiative proposes a bold fix: a single, digital-first European company structure that gives founders, investors, and talent a native home that rivals Delaware. What we cover: * The real cost of Europe's 27-country regulatory fragmentation * Why the SE and EU directives failed startups completely * How the 28th regime would work as a regulation, not a directive * The EU-FAST: frictionless early-stage investment across borders * The EU-ESOP and why dry taxation is killing European talent acquisition * How tax sovereignty is preserved while still streamlining cross-border operations If you follow European tech, venture capital, or economic policy, this one is essential listening. Learn more about EU-INC here: https://www.eu-inc.org