Ep 5: The Intersection of Law and Religion in Malaysia ft. Dr. Dian Shah and Prof. Andrew Harding

Ep 7: Fresh Legal Graduate's Perspective on Law

Welcome back to another episode of Liddat Law! Sorry for the audio quality on this podcast episode due to errors on the calibration of technical equipment. However, if you are able to look past it, this episode is a new face of Liddat Law that looks into the popular topic and discussion I have with a treasured friend, Edward Khaw. Topics such as the Certificate in Legal Practice, Law School studies, AI, and other topics that would interest someone who is intent to study or practice law. This episode helps to remind us that the area of law is just as human as any other industries; that behind the supposed glamour of it all, the struggles and reality of law may hit a little different.

Ep 6: Federalism in Malaysia ft. Prof. Harding

Explore in our latest podcast the governance structure of federalism here in Malaysia. The distinct delineation of powers that defines the power as set out in the Federal Constitution envisions a reality that looks a little different in practice. In this episode, we are going to look at federalism in Malaysia within the context of politics, law, and the interaction of both. Professor Andrew Harding's latest book, "Territorial Governance in Southeast Asia" explores this reality further with our podcast exploring a slither of this interesting area of comparative constitutional law. Guest: Prof. Andrew Harding Audio Editor: Joshua Ngu Host: Benjamin HoDisclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and donot necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent.

Ep 5: The Intersection of Law and Religion in Malaysia ft. Dr. Dian Shah and Prof. Andrew Harding

The intersection of law and religion has recently resurfaced as a hot topic again. Listen as we uncover the multi-faceted reality of religion’s role in Malaysia’s legal landscape today, going in for a deeper dive of Malaysia’s struggle in this aspect and understanding the academic viewpoint of this topic.  Guests: Prof. Andrew Harding and Dr. Dian ShahAudio Editor: Joshua Ngu Host: Benjamin HoDisclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and donot necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent.

Ep 4: How Fair is Divorce in Malaysia? ft. Ms. Deeba

Today's discussion is about the oft-dramatised issue of divorce that is becoming ever more prevalent in our life. In this episode, we discover the complexities surrounding family law in Malaysia, the salient link between private law of divorce with the public law of Malaysian legal system. Listen til the end to discover how Ms. Deeba, an experienced lecturer on many different subjects including but not limited to Family Law at the University of Reading Malaysia, views the issue of divorce in Malaysia from both her academic and personal capacities. Guest: Ms. Deeba Manain Audio Editor: Joshua Ngu Host: Benjamin Ho Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and donot necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent.

Ep 3: Life as a Litigation Lawyer and Beyond ft. Lim Wei Jiet and Prof. Andrew Harding

In today's discussion, we discuss questions usually asked about the life of a litigation lawyer. We find out wide-ranging answers to FAQs from a lawyer's advice to students to what his most memorable case has been thus far. Listen till the end to find out how Mr. Lim Wei Jiet, a LexisNexis® 40 under 40 2024 litigation lawyer, who is experienced in constitutional and corporate litigation, uncovers the life of a litigator. As always, Professor Andrew Harding adds to the conversation with his wealth of knowledge in the realm of constitutional law and politics in Malaysia. Guests: Mr. Lim Wei Jiet, Professor Andrew Harding Audio Editor: Joshua Ngu Host: Benjamin Ho Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and donot necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent.