Mind the Methods

Intro to Mind the Methods

3 min · 5 de feb de 2026
portada del episodio Intro to Mind the Methods

Descripción

In this introductory episode of Mind the Methods, host Elizabeth Pappadopulos, PhD, introduces the mission, scope, and audience of the ISCTM podcast. She outlines how the series will explore innovations in CNS clinical trial design and methodology ranging from digital endpoints, adaptive protocols, and generative AI to patient-centric approaches and real-world challenges across psychiatric, neurologic, and neurodegenerative research. Episode 00 sets the stage for thoughtful, expert-led conversations with researchers, clinicians, industry leaders, and regulators, all focused on advancing rigorous methodology and improving outcomes for patients in CNS drug development.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de Mind the Methods!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

4 episodios

episode Including People with Suicidal Ideation/Behavior in CNS Trials artwork

Including People with Suicidal Ideation/Behavior in CNS Trials

In this episode of Mind the Methods (the ISCTM podcast), Dr. Mark Opler speaks with Dr. Elizabeth Ballard, Associate Scientist at the NIMH Intramural Research Program and the 2025 recipient of the ISCTM Lewis Alan Opler Prize, about the evolving science of suicidal ideation and behavior. Dr. Elizabeth Ballard explains why many commonly used tools were built for risk documentation and legal protection, not for detecting treatment-related changes in clinical trials, and how repurposing them can obscure true signals, particularly for rapidly acting interventions. Drawing on trial examples, Dr. Elizabeth Ballard highlights how different measures (full scales vs. single items/subscales) can yield different conclusions about treatment effects, underscoring that measurement choice can be the difference between “it didn’t work” and “we didn’t measure it correctly.” The conversation also addresses the field’s “catch-22”: trials often exclude participants with suicidal ideation/behavior, limiting what we can learn about how treatments affect people with lived experience. Dr. Ballard discusses practical steps to safely include higher-risk participants, IRB and DSMB education, clear monitoring and response pathways, adverse event planning, and shared resources across research networks. Looking forward, Dr. Elizabeth Ballard describes a “both/and” future that blends clinician interviews with self-report, ecological momentary assessment, and emerging objective/implicit measures, arguing that suicide risk is dynamic and variable, and our tools must evolve to capture that reality.

26 de mar de 202626 min