My Weird Prompts

Death by a Thousand Procedural Motions

32 min · 2 de jun de 2026
Portada del episodio Death by a Thousand Procedural Motions

Descripción

When Israel's attorney general warned of democratic backsliding under Netanyahu, she was immediately attacked for saying so. But what does democratic backsliding actually mean—and how do you spot it before it's too late? This episode breaks down the Levitsky and Ziblatt framework, walks through the Israeli judicial overhaul, the Hungarian constitutional capture, and Poland's partial recovery, and asks whether the damage is reversible once institutions get hollowed out. From competitive authoritarianism to the ratchet effect, we trace the mechanism that makes democratic erosion so insidious: it's legal, it's incremental, and by the time you notice, the referee has already been replaced.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de My Weird Prompts!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

200 episodios

episode The Free Speech Fault Line: UK's Ban on Piker & Uygur artwork

The Free Speech Fault Line: UK's Ban on Piker & Uygur

When the UK Home Office barred Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur from entering the country over concerns their statements could stir up racial hatred, a surprising coalition of defenders emerged — not because they agree with the figures, but because they oppose state power to make that call. This episode explores the three camps of free speech absolutism: civil libertarians like Nadine Strossen, legal scholars like Eugene Volokh, and institutional advocates like FIRE. We examine the philosophical fault line between the US Brandenburg standard and the UK's broader incitement framework, and confront the hardest cases — from Rwanda's RTLM broadcasts to Myanmar's Facebook-fueled violence. The core question: is the risk of government censorship greater than the risk of hate speech leading to real harm?

2 de jun de 202629 min