PetroNoia
What happens if the foundation of U.S. climate regulation is pulled back? In this episode, Dan Romeo sits down with Houston attorney Marcella Burke—founder of Burke Law Group and former EPA official—to break down the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding” and the proposed 2025 repeal. They discuss how Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) led to CO₂ being regulated under the Clean Air Act, why that decision still drives vehicle standards and permitting today, and what a repeal would realistically mean. From expected legal battles to state pushback and industry reactions, this episode unpacks what’s truly at stake. 00:38 Meet Marcella Burke 02:21 Endangerment Finding 101: Clean Air Act basics 05:17 2025 Re-Evaluation: Reopening the science 07:09 Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) 11:10 Legal vs. policy impact 14:22 The Court Battle Ahead 20:10 Industry Divide & Political Stakes 32:29 Immediate Impact: Vehicle standards & permitting 35:23 State Pushback: California & federal tension 36:49 Suncor v. Boulder County & climate litigation 38:40 The Economic Argument for Rescinding 54:06 Closing Thoughts & What’s Next
34 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de PetroNoia!