SortMe Money

SortMe Money

The SortMe Cashflow Health Score: what it is and how it's calculated

10 min · Ayer
portada del episodio The SortMe Cashflow Health Score: what it is and how it's calculated

Descripción

Most NZ households know their credit score matters when they apply for a mortgage — but the number that actually runs their life is the one they look at once a month and interpret from vibes. Apps tell you how much you spent. Banks tell you what your balance is. Neither tells you whether the cashflow position underneath is healthy or quietly fraying. In this episode, SortMe Resident Money Writer Hugo Jonston breaks down the Cashflow Health Score: a single 0–100 number that combines whether you're living within your means with how big your cash cushion actually is — and why those are the only two things that need to be in the headline. SortMe Founder & CEO Carl Thompson puts it bluntly: "Your credit score tells a bank whether you're safe to lend to. In no way does it represent how good you are with your money. Your Cashflow Health Score tells you what shape your household cashflow is actually in. A much more meaningful metric to focus on." In this episode: * Why a single number — and why these two questions (living within your means, and how long you'd last if income stopped) capture almost everything that matters * The Spending sub-score (60% weight): how the surplus ratio maps to the 0–100 scale, why spending exactly what you earn lands around a 30, and why saving roughly $1 in every $5 caps you at 100 * The Buffer sub-score (40% weight): how cash on hand divided by monthly expenses maps to the score — no buffer scores 0, one month scores 40, three months 80, six months 100 * The low-buffer penalty — why a household with less than one month of cash gets the combined score multiplied by 0.5×–1×, and why this is the fastest lever for most people * What counts as a "cash account" — and why KiwiSaver, credit limits, offset facilities, and IRD balances are deliberately excluded from the buffer half * Why the score is forward-looking and annualised — a planned $5,000 holiday in March drags today's score down, because that's what you're actually committed to spending * The five bands (Excellent 86–100 down to Poor 0–30) and why you can't reach the top band on a great surplus ratio alone * Four things the score is not — not a credit score, not a complete financial health rating, not a judgement, and not static (it recomputes on every page load) * The two honest levers for improving it: lift the surplus ratio (spend less or earn more) and grow the cash buffer (one-month, three-month, six-month breakpoints) Read the full article: sortme.com/post/cashflow-health-score-nz

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de SortMe Money!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

15 episodios

episode The SortMe Cashflow Health Score: what it is and how it's calculated artwork

The SortMe Cashflow Health Score: what it is and how it's calculated

Most NZ households know their credit score matters when they apply for a mortgage — but the number that actually runs their life is the one they look at once a month and interpret from vibes. Apps tell you how much you spent. Banks tell you what your balance is. Neither tells you whether the cashflow position underneath is healthy or quietly fraying. In this episode, SortMe Resident Money Writer Hugo Jonston breaks down the Cashflow Health Score: a single 0–100 number that combines whether you're living within your means with how big your cash cushion actually is — and why those are the only two things that need to be in the headline. SortMe Founder & CEO Carl Thompson puts it bluntly: "Your credit score tells a bank whether you're safe to lend to. In no way does it represent how good you are with your money. Your Cashflow Health Score tells you what shape your household cashflow is actually in. A much more meaningful metric to focus on." In this episode: * Why a single number — and why these two questions (living within your means, and how long you'd last if income stopped) capture almost everything that matters * The Spending sub-score (60% weight): how the surplus ratio maps to the 0–100 scale, why spending exactly what you earn lands around a 30, and why saving roughly $1 in every $5 caps you at 100 * The Buffer sub-score (40% weight): how cash on hand divided by monthly expenses maps to the score — no buffer scores 0, one month scores 40, three months 80, six months 100 * The low-buffer penalty — why a household with less than one month of cash gets the combined score multiplied by 0.5×–1×, and why this is the fastest lever for most people * What counts as a "cash account" — and why KiwiSaver, credit limits, offset facilities, and IRD balances are deliberately excluded from the buffer half * Why the score is forward-looking and annualised — a planned $5,000 holiday in March drags today's score down, because that's what you're actually committed to spending * The five bands (Excellent 86–100 down to Poor 0–30) and why you can't reach the top band on a great surplus ratio alone * Four things the score is not — not a credit score, not a complete financial health rating, not a judgement, and not static (it recomputes on every page load) * The two honest levers for improving it: lift the surplus ratio (spend less or earn more) and grow the cash buffer (one-month, three-month, six-month breakpoints) Read the full article: sortme.com/post/cashflow-health-score-nz

Ayer10 min
episode What lifestyle creep is - and why it's so hard to spot artwork

What lifestyle creep is - and why it's so hard to spot

You earned an extra $20,000 this year. Twelve months on, the bank balance is roughly the same, the car is a year newer, the family went somewhere warmer in July, and the kitchen finally got the renovation that was always "in a couple of years". The pay rise arrived. The savings didn't. That's lifestyle creep, and it's the most common pattern SortMe sees in its data — and the one high-income households see least clearly in themselves. It's not unusual to see a household earning $200,000 a year quietly spending $230,000, year after year, without anyone realising it. To put the SortMe data alongside a planning-side view, this episode brings in Josh from MoneyMen, a New Zealand financial adviser whose practice works extensively with $100K+ households. His read matches the SortMe data almost exactly: "The first sign usually isn't the big purchase. It's the lack of surplus despite rising income." In this episode: * What lifestyle creep actually is, and why each individual upgrade is defensible — the trap is that it shows up as a slow drift across thirty or forty categories at once, none screaming for attention * The Stats NZ data: median NZ household income up roughly 12% since 2022, savings rates flat — and the SortMe internal pattern showing discretionary categories (dining, subs, entertainment, travel) lift 15–20% in the three months after a pay rise, and rarely shrink back * What a 10% pay rise actually moves: a $135K household picks up $13,500 pre-tax / ~$9K after tax — and how 80% lifestyle absorption leaves them about $1,800 better off in cash * The three traps SortMe sees most often in NZ right now: the $90K SUV trade-up (Josh: "the equivalent of an investment property deposit on depreciating vehicles"), the bathroom that became a re-clad, and the $400–$600/month subscription stack that never gets reviewed * Josh's adviser playbook for handling a pay rise: 30% wealth creation, 30% debt reduction or flexibility, 40% deliberate lifestyle — strengthen the foundation, accelerate wealth-building, then consciously improve lifestyle * The mindset shift Josh says matters most for high-earning Kiwi households: "Income does not create wealth. Ownership does." — and what the wealthiest clients do differently * The upgrades worth enjoying (family time, outsourcing low-value stress, experiences, health, work flexibility) versus the ones quietly creating long-term financial drag (constant car upgrades, renovations without ROI, financing lifestyle, subscription creep) * Why the new SortMe budgeting split between household fixed expenses and lifestyle expenses changes the question from "did we spend a lot last month?" to "did our lifestyle line grow faster than our fixed line, faster than our income, faster than our savings?" * Josh's closer worth sitting with: "A household that increases investing by even a few hundred dollars a week every time income rises can end up millions ahead over 10–20 years compared to a household earning the same income but absorbing everything into lifestyle." Read the full article: sortme.com/post/lifestyle-creep-nz

24 de may de 202612 min
episode Sharesies, Hatch, Kernel: where each one fits in an NZ portfolio artwork

Sharesies, Hatch, Kernel: where each one fits in an NZ portfolio

Sharesies, Hatch, and Kernel turned the NZ share market from something Kiwis read about in the Weekend Herald into something you can open on the couch — fractional shares of Apple or Nvidia from $5, an S&P 500 ETF bought in 90 seconds, the full US market in your phone, in NZD, anytime. Most coverage treats it as a straight "which app should I pick?" question. SortMe Founder & CEO Carl Thompson thinks the more interesting tension is that easy access isn't the same as good outcomes — and that the platforms' fee models quietly push different behaviours at you, only some of which build wealth over 20 years. This episode walks through where each of the three platforms genuinely earns its place in an NZ portfolio, the boring research that should silently shape the stack, the FIF tax trap most US investors hit around the $50k mark, and why the biggest mistake isn't picking the wrong app — it's never seeing all three on one screen. In this episode: * The one-line job description for each platform: Sharesies as the on-ramp (US + NZ + AU from $5, KiwiSaver built in), Hatch as the deep US route (~6,000 stocks/ETFs in USD, held in your name), and Kernel as the indexer (low-fee NZ-PIE funds at 0.25% p.a. and a low-fee KiwiSaver) * The FIF trap that catches Hatch users: if your overseas shares cost basis crosses $50,000 NZD at any point in the tax year, you're taxed under the Fair Dividend Rate method (deemed 5% of opening value, paid or not) — and why a PIE-wrapped Kernel S&P 500 fund sidesteps the conversation entirely * The unfashionably boring research that should sit silently behind every portfolio decision: S&P's SPIVA scorecard shows 80%+ of active equity funds underperformed their index over the 10 years to December 2025 * The Barber & Odean study of 66,465 US households: the 20% who traded most earned 11.4% a year, the 20% who traded least earned 18.5% — same market, fewer decisions, seven percentage points more return per year, compounded for 20 years * Why the fee model matters more than the fee: transaction-fee platforms (Sharesies, Hatch) earn when you trade more; AUM platforms (Kernel) earn when you contribute and leave it — and which design nudge each one is quietly built around * The stack that works for most NZ households: Kernel as the indexed core (KiwiSaver included), Sharesies as the everyday account for smaller regular orders, Hatch reserved for specific US picks sized below the FIF threshold * What actually sinks multi-platform households — not the platform mix, but the funding drift: auto-invests switched off in March that never came back on, a $1,000 Kernel monthly quietly sitting at $400, a Hatch USD balance nobody looks at until tax time * Carl's take: "The platforms aren't the problem. Picking the right one for the right job is easy in an afternoon. The problem is the discipline to keep funding them every pay cycle, and the visibility to know when one is out of balance. Both of those are software jobs, not willpower jobs." * How SortMe pulls all three onto one screen via Akahu — net worth in NZD across Sharesies, Hatch, Kernel, KiwiSaver, bank and property, with budget auto-allocation that pays the Investing bucket every payday whether you're paying attention or not Read the full article: sortme.com/post/sharesies-vs-hatch-vs-kernel-nz

20 de may de 202613 min
episode Joint or separate? How dual-income NZ households really run their money in 2026 artwork

Joint or separate? How dual-income NZ households really run their money in 2026

Should you keep your money joint, separate, or somewhere in between? After thousands of onboarding calls and customer interviews with NZ households, SortMe Founder & CEO Carl Thompson thinks that's the wrong question. The real one is how two incomes should actually flow through one household — where each pay lands, how the bills get paid, where each partner gets some autonomy, and how anyone ends up with a single screen showing the whole picture. To dig into the relationship side of it, this episode brings in Erika Palmer, Founder & CEO of Cupla — the shared-calendar app used by half a million couples — who's watched the same pattern play out across hundreds of thousands of relationships. "The couples who plan together don't just stay together — they like each other more," she says. This episode walks through the three money frameworks NZ couples drift into, the four-bucket setup that actually scales for the next 20 years, and exactly how to set it up so both partners are looking at the same screen. In this episode: * Meet "Michael and Emma" — SortMe's average dual-income persona, with his-account-her-account-mortgage-in-his-name-Sharesies-in-hers drift, two default Balanced KiwiSavers untouched since signup, and no one ever sitting down to look at the whole thing on one screen * The three money frameworks couples settle into — fully joint (transparency but every $40 lunch is a conversation), fully separate (autonomy but no shared plan), and the yours-mine-ours hybrid that most NZ households eventually land on * The four-bucket setup that scales: one household account where all income lands, then automatic splits — 60% to essentials, 10% split between personal spending allowances, 10% to short-term savings, 20% to long-term investing (Barefoot Investor's 60/10/10/20 framework) * Why the personal allowance is the line worth getting right — too low and one partner resents it, too high and the savings line gets squeezed * Erika's read on what actually breaks relationships financially: "Asymmetry in planning isn't the problem... Contention enters when the person carrying the load feels their effort isn't seen. The unsticking point is visibility." * The 20-minute quarterly check-in and the four questions to run through with the SortMe screen open between you * How to invite your partner into your SortMe workspace for free — only one of you needs a subscription — and the one rule for joint accounts so the same transactions don't show up twice * Why the thing that compounds over 20 years isn't just the investment account — it's the conversation, and what changes when both partners can finally see the same picture Read the full article: sortme.com/post/joint-or-separate-finances-nz

18 de may de 202610 min
episode Budgeting v3 is live. Your essentials and your lifestyle now live apart artwork

Budgeting v3 is live. Your essentials and your lifestyle now live apart

Budgeting every dollar sucks. It's also impossible. Traditional budgeting apps ask you to pre-allocate "lunches: $80" or "kids' activities: $50" in January and expect reality to obey — one week leftovers are free, the next you're buying every day; one weekend the sun is out and the kids are at the park, the next you're paying for movies, ten-pin bowling and Sunday dinner. That's why most people who download a regular budgeting app abandon it within three months. SortMe Founder & CEO Carl Thompson and the SortMe team have spent more iterations than they can count rebuilding the budget around a simpler idea: your essentials are forecastable, your lifestyle isn't — so stop pretending they are. This episode walks through what's new in Budgeting v3, why splitting essentials from lifestyle changes how households actually use a budget, and the maths that makes a single Lifestyle cap one of the most powerful levers on a five-year mortgage cycle. In this episode: * The honest case against forecasting every dollar — and why traditional category-by-category budgeting drives a three-month abandonment problem * The core insight behind v3: mortgage, rates, power, water and broadband are forecastable; lunches, coffees, kids' activities and the weekend plan are not — and trying to budget both the same way is why budgets break * How Category Groups work — Household Essentials and Lifestyle Spending ship by default, you decide where the streaming sub and the gym membership land, and you can rename or add more groups so your reports follow how your household actually thinks * Managing at the right altitude: set a single $1,500/month cap on Lifestyle Spending and stop tracking whether lunch was $80 or $140 this week — or keep using category-level targets if you prefer line-level control (the split works either way) * The maths that makes the split worth setting up: $400/month redirected from lifestyle into the mortgage, KiwiSaver or a fund is $4,800 a year — $24,000 across a five-year fixed cycle, reallocated to assets * The five-step, ten-minute tune-up: confirm categories sit in the right group, rename or add groups, set a group cap (optional), adjust category-level budgets, and open the new reporting view * How the migration works — every existing account has been moved to v3 automatically, so the change is visible the moment you open SortMe * Where to get hands-on help — book time with Charlotte Barraclough, SortMe's Chief Customer Officer, via the Book Pro Help button at the top of your account Read the full article: sortme.com/post/budgeting-v3-essentials-vs-lifestyle

14 de may de 20264 min