Story Deep Dive Podcast
Welcome to Story Deep Dive! In this bonus episode, Dana and Rachel dig into structure — not as a set of rules imposed from the outside, but as the tool that makes telling a story actually possible. Whether you’ve been resisting a beat sheet or spinning out on a blank page, this episode reframes structure as a cheat code that works for you and a compass that points toward the story you’re trying to tell. Whether you write romance, crime, fantasy, or anywhere in between, you’ll come away with a clearer sense of how structure functions, why genre expectations are actually on your side, and why the placeholder is the most underrated tool in any writer’s toolkit. You can also watch the video version of this podcast on YouTube! Estimate Timestamps 0:05 — Check-Ins: Final Pushes, Full Manuscript Requests, and a Summer Retreat Rachel’s clients are deep in their final stretch before publication or pitching. One book is days away from going to the proofreader for a July release. Another client just landed her first full manuscript request from an agent — a significant milestone a few weeks into querying. A third client is wrapping his query letter and plans to start pitching this summer. Dana’s gearing up for the first-ever DTW Summer Retreat, a mid-year checkpoint where Inner Circle students take stock of what they planned in December versus what actually happened. “I planned it like X, Y, Z, and this is what it’s been like in reality.” 11:20 — The Topic: Why Structure Matters (And Why You’re Not Exempt) Dana sets the tone upfront: she loves structure, and this episode is going to push you whether it’s your jam or not. Rachel frames the two entry points: Dana sees structure as a cheat code for intentional storytelling. Rachel sees it as a service to the audience — a mechanism for delivering the experience the reader came for. Both positions arrive at the same place. 14:10 — Structure as a Cheat Code When you have a structure — whether it’s a beat sheet, a four-act map, the heroic journey, or Save the Cat — you have a blueprint. Dana makes the comparison directly: no one wings building a house. The blueprint doesn’t decide what the house looks like; it ensures it doesn’t fall down. Structure gives you mile markers for when tension should escalate, when emotional payoff should land, and when turning points should hit. Your creative energy goes into what lives between the markers, not into deciding whether the markers exist. 17:18 — Genre Expectations as Creative Constraints That Help Rachel’s central argument: genre expectations are not restrictions — they’re a contract with the reader. She uses Sharp Objects as the example. Gillian Flynn uses the crime genre’s structural requirements (investigation, suspects, investigative beats) as the container for exploring violence, belonging, and family darkness. The structure focused the exploration. It didn’t confine it. “She uses the expectations of the crime genre to do that. But then the contents of those beats — what’s actually happening, what the crimes even are — these are all part of the exploration.” Genre expectations give writers a set of buckets for their ideas. The reader’s expectations become a scaffold to build on, not a ceiling to bump against. 22:07 — Structure as a Cure for the Blank Page Dana names it directly: structure is “a cure for feeling lost on the page.” When you know what the next beat needs to accomplish, the blank page stops being a void and becomes a question with parameters. Rachel extends this to the editing phase: holding a draft up against a structure lets you see not just that something is dragging, but why — what beat got skipped, what escalation got missed. The diagnostic clarity that structure provides works at every stage of the process. 24:06 — The Placeholder Is Your Friend Don’t spin out on a hazy scene. Put in a placeholder that names what needs to go there and keep moving. Rachel’s instruction: finish the draft first. Having the whole story gives you the context to fill those gaps in — “sometimes you need, number one, the distance from the thing. And two, the whole story.” Dana adds her practical approach: brackets in the manuscript for missing research, unnamed characters, or underdeveloped scenes. “It is so satisfying to do a control find and go find those brackets and begin to fill them in.” The broader point: knowing your structure helps you know what you don’t know. You can’t fix a gap you can’t see. 32:37 — Structure as Audience Service and the Genre Contract Dana and Rachel both push back on the idea that breaking structure is how you become original. Dana: “You don’t want somebody doing the neck snap because you did something off the wall. You would rather be that you give them what they’re looking for, but you do it in a way that only you can do it.” Structure is the starting line. Your voice, your tropes, your specific combination of elements — that’s what you bring inside it. Rachel frames it as service: structure helps your audience track the story, follow the emotional arc, and arrive at a satisfying landing. When the genre contract is broken, readers notice the violation instead of feeling the emotion. 38:04 — Innovating Inside Structure (Not by Breaking It) For commercial fiction writers, structural expectations are good news. The opportunities to innovate are wide. The mistake is looking for originality in the wrong direction — reaching for structural weirdness instead of leaning into what makes your specific execution distinctive. Dana: “Nail it and then begin to make strategic choices intentionally. You’ve already established the foundation that’s already there and good to go.” Structure also frees up creative energy: once the framework is holding the story, you can pour your best work into the elements you love most. 44:33 — Structure Becomes Intuitive — But Never Absent Experienced writers who seem to write without structure aren’t winging it. The structure is internalized. Dana: “People mistake that for being that you don’t have structure. You do — it is innate. When you think of an idea, it’s already placed securely where it should be.” Rachel adds the honest clarification: fluency doesn’t mean the first draft is clean. It means you can feel when something is wrong and name why. You develop the ability to distinguish between the voice of fear and the voice of writer’s intuition — and that distinction, once you can hear it, changes everything. Next Episode: Dana and Rachel kick off their discussion of Fourth Wing by Rebecca Yarros. Join the Conversation: Like what you heard? Subscribe, leave a review, and share your thoughts. Follow Story Deep Dive at storydeepdive.com [http://www.storydeepdive.com] and connect with Dana and Rachel to keep the discussion going! This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit storydeepdive.substack.com [https://storydeepdive.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]
74 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Story Deep Dive Podcast!