The Proving Ground

Spreading Democracy | The Proving Ground Ep. 4

21 min · 1 de jul de 2019
portada del episodio Spreading Democracy | The Proving Ground Ep. 4

Descripción

Should the United States spread democracy abroad? Is it any of our business? Jacob and Richie dive into the best and worst arguments on either side. Show Notes: Worst Pro-Spreading Arguments Jacob: It worked in Germany and Japan (Availability bias) Richie: Freedom is the cry of every human heart (False premise) Worst Anti-Spreading Arguments: Jacob: Military Industrial Complex, warmongerers (Ad hominem) Richie: What happens abroad doesn't affect us (Begs the question) Best Pro-Spreading Arguments: Jacob: There has never been war between two democracies Richie: America is better off in a freer world Best Anti-Spreading Arguments: Jacob: State's duty to its own people Richie: Forced democracy is antithetical to freedom

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de The Proving Ground!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

6 episodios

episode Social Media Regulation | The Proving Ground Ep. 3 artwork

Social Media Regulation | The Proving Ground Ep. 3

Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and other tech giants are operating somewhere between the space of a platform and a publisher, censoring some viewpoints and favoring others. Should the government step in to protect speech, or should we let the free market run its course? Here are the best and worst arguments on each side. Show Notes: https://www.businessinsider.com/steven-crowder-youtube-channel-demonetized-2019-6 Worst Pro-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: The First Amendment says I can say what I want (false premise) Richie: Censorship violates freedom of speech and association (false premise) Worst Anti-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: Just don't say offensive things (begs the question, proves too much) Richie: They're only censoring the most extreme (false premise, potential slippery slope in response) Best Pro-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: Those who have been censored can sue for defamation Richie: Big tech has too much power and should be forced to choose whether it is a platform or a publisher Best Anti-Regulation Arguments: Jacob: You have no right to a platform Richie: Private companies can do whatever they want as long as they don't breach contracts

24 de jun de 201929 min
episode The Electoral College | The Proving Ground Ep. 2 artwork

The Electoral College | The Proving Ground Ep. 2

Jacob and Richie dissect the best and worst arguments surrounding the infamous Electoral College. The president-elect has only lost the popular vote five times in 230 years, but two of those have been in the last 20 years. Keep it, abolish it, or reform it? You decide. Show Notes: https://ballotpedia.org/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact [https://ballotpedia.org/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact] https://history.house.gov/Institution/Electoral-College/Electoral-College/ [https://history.house.gov/Institution/Electoral-College/Electoral-College/] Worst Pro-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: The Founders were wise men (appeal to authority) Richie: The Constitution says so (appeal to tradition) Worst Anti-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: The Founding Fathers were racists and the Electoral College is a racist system of oppression (ad hominem) Richie: The Electoral College is undemocratic (false premise) Best Pro-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: Provides a check on democracy Richie: President of the UNITED States, 51 separate elections Best Anti-Electoral College Arguments: Jacob: Not representative -- small states have too much power Richie: Not representative -- points not awarded by district

17 de jun de 201924 min