The Reminger Report: Emerging Technologies

AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law

11 min · 8 de abr de 2026
Portada del episodio AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law

Descripción

In this episode of the Reminger Report Podcast on Emerging Technologies, Zachary Pyers and Kyle Wallace discuss the growing legal challenges posed by lawyers’ and judges’ reliance on artificial intelligence—particularly the issue of AI‑generated “hallucinated” case citations. The conversation traces the evolution of these problems from early cases like Mata v. Avianca to the more recent Shahid v. Esaam, where an appellate court discovered that a trial court had unknowingly incorporated faulty, AI‑generated citations into its decision. Kyle and Zach explore the ethical obligations of attorneys under rules like Rule 11, the judiciary’s response to AI‑related errors, and why the continued rise of AI calls for vigilance, verification, and responsible use rather than abandonment.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de The Reminger Report: Emerging Technologies!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

74 episodios

episode AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law artwork

AI Hallucinations in the Courts: Lessons from Emerging Case Law

In this episode of the Reminger Report Podcast on Emerging Technologies, Zachary Pyers and Kyle Wallace discuss the growing legal challenges posed by lawyers’ and judges’ reliance on artificial intelligence—particularly the issue of AI‑generated “hallucinated” case citations. The conversation traces the evolution of these problems from early cases like Mata v. Avianca to the more recent Shahid v. Esaam, where an appellate court discovered that a trial court had unknowingly incorporated faulty, AI‑generated citations into its decision. Kyle and Zach explore the ethical obligations of attorneys under rules like Rule 11, the judiciary’s response to AI‑related errors, and why the continued rise of AI calls for vigilance, verification, and responsible use rather than abandonment.

8 de abr de 202611 min