The Short Version
THE LONGER VERSION: In this episode, Danny recounts his experience as an expert witness in a murder trial evaluating two competing sets of crime scene photographs of blood stains. What the photos showed (or didn’t) was a potentially significant detail in the case. More important for this conversation is the context: The photographs were originally shot on 35mm film and therefore theoretically beyond the reach of the digital and AI manipulation we fret so much about today. But as Danny explained to the court and us, the notion that analog photos depict reality any more than digital ones has always been fantasy. What we think we see in photos, then and now, is as much about us, what we are told about them, and the innumerable unknown choices — like how to balance the colors in the image — made by those who produced them. There seem to be parallels there to the so-called "CSI Effect," in which jurors' casual knowledge of forensic science fueled by popular culture has been blamed for creating unrealistic evidentiary standards in their minds while deciding actual cases. (This may or may not be true [https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/csi-effect-does-it-really-exist#hypothesis-and-discussion-on-what-it-means].) Danny had more to say about his courtroom experience, and the way photographic evidence is used and interpreted in courtrooms more generally. The rest of the story, edited and condensed below for brevity, is worth a read. ________________________________ DG: When developing a photo, there's such a thing as a standard color balance. However, there are a lot of things that affect the color temperature — the light under which it was photographed and if there was a window open at the time. There are a lot of things that affect decisions about exposure and shadows and highlights. I looked at the two sets of prints in this case, and I would not have balanced either set of prints the way they were balanced. The prosecution’s were way red. The defense’s were way cyan. The true, or at least the aesthetically correct, balance was somewhere in between. We also have to keep in mind that a photograph of something is not the thing itself. That's to say that you can't point to things in that frame and say what they are. It's a photograph of something. It's something that looks like a garage floor, and it's something that looks like some kind of stain. To make the leap to say not only what it is — what that substance is — but how old it is and how it got there, that's something we should laugh at. But this is the police and a forensic photographer. And they're official — they're experts. The jury hears this and believes they know how they use photographs. They hold it up like a window to reality and look and say, “I got it. See, this happened.” At one point, the judge got frustrated with me. I had the viewing filters that a person uses to make color decisions about which way photographs should be developed. And if you stare through it — you hold a magenta filter up to your eye and you stare through it — eventually it looks fine. Your brain is adjusting in real time. Printers know you have to flash it in front of your eye — on, off, on, off, on, off — and then look at a card that tells you what to do. Dial in 10 points of magenta, or take it out. I showed the judge: here, look —motor oil, blood, motor oil, blood. And he's like, “You got one of those that makes it look like the Easter Bunny?” I said, “Well, no, I'm not saying that anything's possible. I'm saying that the argument that this represents unmediated truth is insane. It's a depiction. It's an abstraction. It's a two-dimensional photographic record of the way something looked at a time with all these other executive decisions that came into play.” GO DEEPER Check out Danny's personal website [https://www.dannygoodwin.com/] to learn more about his art, specifically Job/Security [https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780262048699], a collaboration with UAlbany English Professor Edward Schwarzschild that examines the expanding U.S. homeland security sector through interviews and photographs. He and Schwarzschild were interviewed about that project seven years ago [https://ualbanynewspodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/the-growing-industry-of-homeland-security-with-danny-goodwin-and-ed-schwarzschild] on another UAlbany podcast. Back to the topic at hand: Photography’s crisis of confidence is not new, and for evidence of that Danny pointed to the discovery that one of the most iconic photos in U.S. history —the flag raising on Iwo Jima —doesn’t show exactly what people thought it did for 70 years [https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/23/483235411/marines-confirm-decades-old-case-of-mistaken-identity-in-iwo-jima-photo]. Another striking wartime photo —Robert Capa’s “Falling Soldier” from the Spanish Civil War —has also inspired skepticism about its reported location and context [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/arts/design/18capa.html]. For a more contemporary example, Danny pointed to the way photography, videography and AI shaped the public’s understanding [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/15/us/politics/minneapolis-videos-killings-artificial-intelligence.html] of what happened during this year’s immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, in which two people were shot and killed by federal law enforcement. If you haven’t yet, you should also check out last week’s episode of The Short Version on 19th-century spirit photography [https://the-short-version.simplecast.com/episodes/grief-tech-whatai-aura-photos-and19th-century-spirit-photographs-have-in-common] with Associate Professor of English Erica Fretwell, which perfectly set the stage this conversation. EPISODE CREDITS Audio editing and production by Scott Freedman Photos by Patrick Dodson Interview by Jordan Carleo-Evangelist Hosted and written by Erin Frick The Short Version is produced by the Office of Communications and Marketing [https://www.albany.edu/communications-marketing] at the University at Albany, which is part of the State University of New York. Comments, ideas, suggestions? Send them to mediarelations@albany.edu [mediarelations@albany.edu] and be sure to put The Short Version in the subject line.
21 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y forma parte de la comunidad de The Short Version!