Tonic Discussions

Discussing Peter Singer's Take on Animals

1 h 8 min · 7 de dic de 2023
Portada del episodio Discussing Peter Singer's Take on Animals

Descripción

First off, the subject matter for this one is intense, viewer discretion is advised. The start of Edmund Howe's article in the Journal of Clinical Ethics says it all. "Peter Singer, a leading philosopher who advocates animals' interests. expressed views on human/animal sex in an on-line book review. He said that while he didn't regard bestiality as "normal or natural," he didn't find it necessarily offensive" to our status and dignity a human being. He said this to highlight what he sees as many humans' hypocrisy regarding the treatment of animals: they are outraged at human/animal sex, when no one, ostensibly, is harmed. Yet these same people may show no concern when thousands of animals suffer needlessly every day." (https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi... [https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbW95SFpibUdhQk5sMXdJVzFJSXR3Q0dEbUpiZ3xBQ3Jtc0tsOXk2NE4wX1VNa2RrZ29waHlLX1dCMHlBaHpuX3VUcWpyWERmRFdFNkY1SjVJTWQtVW5PcTZDTTJyOUttR0JYODBCVVgwNmhucnNpb0VaZVFibGlKZkFDU2pQU1FfejZHeU5CTEo2TlppdkZLSmM2TQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.journals.uchicago.edu%2Fdoi%2Fepdf%2F10.1086%2FJCE200314413&v=pGA7krZXEfg]) This take starts the conversation which quickly expands into the difference between humans and animals (a difference in degree or in kind?).

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Tonic Discussions!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

24 episodios

episode Discussing Peter Singer's Take on Animals artwork

Discussing Peter Singer's Take on Animals

First off, the subject matter for this one is intense, viewer discretion is advised. The start of Edmund Howe's article in the Journal of Clinical Ethics says it all. "Peter Singer, a leading philosopher who advocates animals' interests. expressed views on human/animal sex in an on-line book review. He said that while he didn't regard bestiality as "normal or natural," he didn't find it necessarily offensive" to our status and dignity a human being. He said this to highlight what he sees as many humans' hypocrisy regarding the treatment of animals: they are outraged at human/animal sex, when no one, ostensibly, is harmed. Yet these same people may show no concern when thousands of animals suffer needlessly every day." (https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi... [https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbW95SFpibUdhQk5sMXdJVzFJSXR3Q0dEbUpiZ3xBQ3Jtc0tsOXk2NE4wX1VNa2RrZ29waHlLX1dCMHlBaHpuX3VUcWpyWERmRFdFNkY1SjVJTWQtVW5PcTZDTTJyOUttR0JYODBCVVgwNmhucnNpb0VaZVFibGlKZkFDU2pQU1FfejZHeU5CTEo2TlppdkZLSmM2TQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.journals.uchicago.edu%2Fdoi%2Fepdf%2F10.1086%2FJCE200314413&v=pGA7krZXEfg]) This take starts the conversation which quickly expands into the difference between humans and animals (a difference in degree or in kind?).

7 de dic de 20231 h 8 min