308. The Myth Of Learning From Failure

Beschrijving

To exercise consistency and become the person who follows through, join The ACT Score Challenge [https://www.skool.com/exercising-self-control-1199/about] today. There is a piece of folk wisdom that says you learn more from failure than from success. It sounds right. It feels earned. It gives failure a purpose, which makes failure easier to accept. And, as a general claim about how the human brain works, this is false. The cultural narrative around failure has become so prevalent that questioning it can sound like arguing against growth itself. But this is not a motivational claim. It’s a neuroscientific one. The brain is wired to learn from getting things right. It does not automatically encode what went wrong. If you want to understand how learning actually happens, you begin with this asymmetry. Today’s going to get a little scientific. I haven’t done one of these in a while. Let’s dig in. Hey there. It’s me, Kore. And you’re listening to Exercising Consistency: From Fitness to Flourishing. Image generated using ChatGPT. What the Brain Does With Success In 2009, Earl K. Miller and his colleagues at MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory published a study that gave researchers their first real-time snapshot of how single brain cells change during learning. Monkeys were trained to look at alternating images and respond correctly for a reward. The researchers tracked what happened inside individual neurons immediately after a correct response versus an incorrect response. The result was clear-cut. When a behaviour was successful, brain cells became more finely tuned to what the animal was learning. The neurons physically changed. They sharpened. After a failure, there was little or no change in the brain, and no improvement in behaviour. Miller put it plainly: brain cells keep track of whether recent behaviours were successful or not, and they only adjust when the answer is yes. This is neural plasticity in its most selective form. The brain does not treat all feedback equally. It prioritizes success. The signal that says “that worked” is the one that rewires the circuitry. The signal that says “that didn’t work” passes through without leaving the same structural trace. What the Brain Does With Failure The ego adds a second layer to this problem. A series of studies by Lauren Eskreis-Winkler and Ayelet Fishbach at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business used a deceptively simple tool called the Facing Failure game. Participants answered multiple-choice questions across successive rounds. Feedback from earlier rounds helped them perform better later, and more correct answers meant more money. Across many rounds people consistently underlearned from failure. Even when the researchers offered a learning bonus 900% larger than the base payment, participants still learned less from failure than from success. The incentive did not matter. The mechanism was not rational. What was happening was emotional. Failure threatens self-esteem. When the ego registers a loss, it triggers a fight-or-flight response. * Fight looks like dismissal: the task was unfair, the feedback was wrong, it doesn’t matter anyway. * Flight is more common. In flight, the person simply disengages. They stop paying attention. This is the ostrich effect, named for the tendency of investors to stop checking their portfolios when the market drops while compulsively tracking every gain. The brain protects itself by looking away. The Dopamine Directive There is a chemical reason success teaches and failure does not. When you perform an action that produces a positive outcome, the brain releases dopamine. Dopamine is not a pleasure chemical. It is a learning signal. It tells the neural pathway that produced the successful action to strengthen, to become more likely to fire again in the same configuration. The sequence gets locked in. Failure does not trigger the same signal. There is no equivalent chemical instruction that says “weaken the pathway that produced the error.” The brain does not automatically subtract. It only adds and it adds in response to success. This means that if you want to change a behaviour pattern, the mechanism is not eliminating the wrong pattern. It’s building and reinforcing the right one until the wrong one atrophies from disuse. When Failure Actually Works None of this means failure is useless. It means failure requires conscious effort to extract value from it and that effort only pays off under specific conditions. The first condition is observing someone else’s failure. When your own ego is not on the line, the brain stays engaged. You can study what went wrong without the threat response shutting down your attention. This is why case studies, postmortems, and watching a more experienced person make a mistake can be genuinely instructive. The second condition is active introspection with a growth mindset. The brain does produce a physical error signal when a mistake occurs. If you override the instinct to disengage and instead manually debug what happened, you can extract the lesson. But this takes deliberate effort. It is not automatic. The third condition is operating outside your comfort zone, but only if you eventually find the correct answer. Making mistakes during difficult practice forces the brain into a state of neuroplasticity. It becomes more flexible, more open to change. But the learning itself still happens when you get it right. The mistake opens the door. The success walks through it. The Discipline and the Return This is where the neuroscience converges with the practice I call The Discipline. The Discipline is the practice of returning attention to your personal standard of excellence. Not dwelling on the miss. Not punishing yourself for the miss. Not celebrating the miss as if it were inherently instructive. Just returning. Each Enacted Choice is a fresh opportunity. Who you choose to be is not determined by past failure. Character is the retrospective pattern of past choices. It is never a fixed state. The next rep, the next decision, remains entirely open. What the MIT study tells us is that this return (of our attention to our standard of excellence) is not just philosophically sound, it’s neurologically accurate. The learning does not happen in the error. It happens in the correction. The brain changes when you get it right. So the work is not analyzing why you missed the workout. The work is doing the next one. The body is the first honest teacher. When you fail a lift, the signal is immediate and unambiguous. But the signal itself does not make you stronger. What makes you stronger is the successful rep that follows: the one where you adjust, correct, and execute. Exercise is the rehearsal space for this pattern. The simplest domain in which to practice the dichotomy of control. You cannot will the weight to move. You can only will your attention back to the standard and attempt again. Engineering Success If the brain learns from success, then the practical project is straightforward: structure your practice so that success is frequent. This is why simple exercise, simple practice is not a concession. It’s the strategy. You already have access to programs, videos, books, and trainers. What you lack is not a better program. It’s the meta-skill of consistency. And consistency is built on successful repetitions, not failed ones. Each completed workout, each Enacted Choice aligned with the standard, reinforces the neural pathway that makes the next one more likely. The cultural advice to fail forward gets the sequence wrong. You do not learn from falling. You learn from standing back up. The standing is what the brain records. The standing is what changes you. The falling is just data: a signal that something needs adjusting, nothing more, and nothing that defines who you are. Stop treating failure as if it carries inherent instructional value. It does not. What teaches you is getting it right. Engineer small wins. Return to the standard. Let success do what failure cannot. An Invitation When you’re ready to exercise consistency and become the person who follows through, start your Day 1 inside The ACT Score Challenge [https://www.skool.com/exercising-self-control-1199/about]. Stack the days and practice the reps that reshape your identity. That’s it for today. Catch you next time. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit stoicstrength.substack.com [https://stoicstrength.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

350. Stop Trying To Be Disciplined, Do Disciplined Things: Architectural Consistency (Part 3 of 3)

To exercise consistency and become the person who follows through, join The ACT Score Challenge [https://www.skool.com/exercising-self-control-1199/about] today. A system is a structure. But a structure without a foundation will not survive. The architecture we built in the last episode (the Floor, the trigger, the binary metric, the Scope of Effort, the written protocol) can keep a behaviour alive through almost any conditions. But there is one question the architecture alone cannot answer. Why keep going? The answer is not motivation. Motivation is an intermittent emotional state with no fixed schedule. The answer is identity. When the system becomes an expression of who you are rather than a list of things you do, consistency is no longer a battle. It is a default. Hey there. It’s me, Kore. And you’re listening to Exercising Consistency: From Fitness to Flourishing. This is the final episode of three on Architectural Consistency. In the first episode (#348) [https://stoicstrength.substack.com/p/348-routines-break-systems-endure], we established the distinction between routines and systems. In yesterday’s (#349) [https://stoicstrength.substack.com/p/349-build-an-exercise-system-that], we built the system: five components, each addressing a specific failure point. Today we integrate the system into identity so that consistency becomes not something you chase but something you express as you move through the world. The DO-BE-HAVE Sequence There is a popular model of personal development called BE-DO-HAVE. First, BE the kind of person who succeeds. Then DO what that person does. Then HAVE the results. The sequence sounds logical. In practice, it’s not only weak, it’s harmful. It treats identity as a prerequisite for action. But you cannot think your way into a new identity, any more than you can think your way into becoming strong enough to squat heavier weight. Identity, like physical strength, is a consequence of repeated action. The actual sequence is DO-BE-HAVE. You train consistently and long enough that “disciplined” becomes an accurate description of you. You didn’t declare it, you demonstrated it. Action creates identity. Identity stabilizes behaviour. And the results emerge downstream. The system, when enacted, is the DO. The five components are how you act. And when you act consistently over time, the BE emerges. You do not wake up one morning as a disciplined person and then start training. You train, and gradually, the person who trains is who you are. There is no becoming. There is only being, expressed in the present moment of Enacted Choice. Character is the retrospective pattern of past choices, never a fixed state. And definitely not the result of merely declaring who you are. The 84-Day Commitment The system needs a container. A defined cycle with a fixed starting line and a fixed review date. Without a container, the system drifts. Small exceptions become larger exceptions. The protocol shifts based on mood. The trainer (System 2, the conscious, agentic aspect of the brain) becomes inconsistent, and the student (System 1, the non-conscious, automatic aspect of the brain) receives conflicting data. I use an 84-day cycle. Twelve weeks. The research on exercise adherence supports this window. The sharpest spike in dropout occurs between weeks 6 and 10. By day 90, roughly half of all people who start a new exercise program have quit entirely. But those who survive past the three-month mark have an 80% probability of remaining active a year later. 84 days gets you past the inflection point. Past the point where novelty has worn off and the new behaviour is still fragile. Past the point where most people quit. And once you are through that window, the behaviour has begun to stabilize, because the neural pathways have had enough consistent input to begin solidifying. The commitment is simple. Write the protocol once. Lock it for 84 days. Execute without negotiation. Review only at the end of the cycle, not within it. The loop continues: observe, compare against the standard, act, receive feedback, adjust, repeat. But the major course corrections and adjustments happen between cycles, not during them. The Root The architecture keeps the behaviour alive. The container gives it time to stabilize. But there is one more layer beneath both. Without it, the system eventually drifts regardless of how well it is designed. That layer is your values. I have talked about this all the way back in Episode 34: The Consistency That Ensures Consistency [https://stoicstrength.substack.com/p/the-consistency-that-ensures-consistency]. There is a distinction between consistent behaviour and consistent living of your values. Behavioural consistency is what you do. Values consistency is why you keep doing it when the reasons to stop accumulate. When your system is aligned with what you genuinely value, the question “Why keep going?“ answers itself. If you value your health, the exercise system is not a chore you endure. It’s an expression of who you are. If you value presence with your family, the system that protects your evening time is not a restriction. It is a reinforcement of your deepest commitments. The Stoics understood this. Epictetus, the ancient Stoic teacher, organized his entire philosophy around three disciplines, and the first was the Discipline of Desire: train yourself to want only what is within your control. When your desires are aligned with reality, you are free. When they are pinned to externals, you are a slave to whoever controls those externals. And if no one controls them, it comes down to random chance. Align the system with your values and consistency becomes self-sustaining. The behaviour flows from your values rather than fighting against your impulses every morning. The system is not something you have to do. It’s something that makes sense to do because it reflects who you choose to be when you exercise virtuous self-control. The Foundation Think of the structure as a building. What you see from the street are the actions: the individual choices, the single workouts, the one completed protocol. They are visible. They are measurable. They are what other people notice. But they are also the furthest element from the ground. They sit at the top of the structure. And anything that sits at the top depends on everything beneath. Directly beneath the actions are the routines. The specific sequences you execute day to day. The “What do I do next?“ that makes action possible. Beneath the routines is the system. The architecture. The five components that ensure the behaviour keeps happening when conditions deteriorate. The Floor. The trigger. The binary metric. The Scope of Effort. The written protocol. This is the load-bearing structure. Without it, the routines and actions that sit upon it have nothing to reinforce them. And providing support to the entire system, at the very bottom, extending deep into the ground, is the foundation: your principles and your values. What you genuinely believe matters. What you are unwilling to compromise on. The system rests on this. If the foundation shifts, the architecture cracks. If the foundation is solid, the system can weather almost any storm. Most people start at the top. They focus on actions and routines. They build a morning sequence, a workout plan, a productivity checklist without asking what architecture will hold it up or what foundation it rests on. Then life disrupts the sequence and the whole thing collapses, because there was nothing underneath it. Start at the bottom. Clarify the foundation. Build the architecture on top of it. The routines and actions will follow. What Remains You don’t want to be fighting yourself every morning for the rest of your life. And you won’t if you are regularly designing a structure that makes the fight unnecessary. The body does not wake up and decide what needs doing. The systems and sub-systems are in place. They run because the architecture demands it and because the architecture is aligned with the organism’s most important goal: survival. The system that is your life, aligned with your values and standards of personal excellence, can reach the same status. Consistency need no longer be a daily struggle. It can be the default output of a structure that you, as the architect, have designed to produce it. An Invitation When you’re ready to turn consistency from an idea into a solid system, start your Day 1 inside The ACT Score Challenge [https://www.skool.com/exercising-self-control-1199/about]. That’s it for today. Catch you next time. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit stoicstrength.substack.com [https://stoicstrength.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Gisteren11 min

349. Build an Exercise System That Actually Lasts: Architectural Consistency (Part 2 of 3)

To exercise consistency and become the person who follows through, join The ACT Score Challenge [https://www.skool.com/exercising-self-control-1199/about] today. The difference between a good workout and a consistent exercise practice is not a matter of intensity. It’s architecture. Most people spend years trying to build a better routine and never ask the question that determines whether the behaviour survives. A routine becomes effective once the system is established. A system is the structure that ensures the behaviour keeps happening when there are good excuses to quit available. That structure has an anatomy. Five components. Each one addresses a specific failure point. Skip one, and the whole thing becomes fragile. Hey there. It’s me, Kore. And you’re listening to Exercising Consistency: From Fitness to Flourishing. This is Episode 2 of 3 on Architectural Consistency. In the last episode [https://stoicstrength.substack.com/p/348-routines-break-systems-endure], I established the distinction between routines and systems. Routines are procedural. Systems are architectural. Routines are linear, step by step. Systems are cybernetic, looping continuously through observation, comparison, action, feedback, and adjustment. Without that loop, there is no system. Only repetition. Today we build the system, answering questions and addressing issues the routine cannot. The Floor The first component is a minimum standard you can meet on your worst day. The trend is to set a ceiling. Many people aim to optimize right out of the gate. They define what success looks like under ideal conditions: an hour at the gym, a full morning routine, perfect execution. When conditions degrade, the ceiling becomes unreachable. They skip the session entirely. The all-or-nothing ceiling produces nothing far more often than it produces all. Setting a Floor works in the opposite direction. It defines the minimum that counts as continuity. The intensity does not matter. What matters is that the behaviour occurred and the pathway was reinforced. The body does not optimize for peak performance. It optimizes for continuity. Your heart does not decide to skip a beat because conditions are not ideal. Your system, modeled on the same principle, keeps running at whatever capacity is currently available. The standard adapts to conditions. The standard never drops to zero. Consistency first, intensity when it makes sense. The Trigger The second component is an environmental trigger, a circumstance, that removes decision from the moment of action. System 2, the conscious and intentional aspect of the brain, cannot simply choose to voluntarily wake up and make the right choice when System 1, the automatic and non-conscious aspect of the brain, is working. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) only fires on concrete prediction errors, not on abstract misalignment. If the trigger is “when I feel motivated,” the behaviour will not occur. Motivation is not a trigger. It is an intermittent emotional state with no fixed schedule. A proper trigger is physical and specific. For example, “When I walk into the kitchen at 7:00 AM, then I fill my water bottle.” Or “When I close my laptop at 5:00 PM, then I change into my workout clothes and go to the office gym.” The environment itself initiates the sequence. No decision. No negotiation. The routine begins because the trigger fired, and the trigger fires because the environment was designed to make it inevitable. The Binary Metric The third component is a success condition that leaves no room for reinterpretation. Abstract goals invite rationalization. “I want to feel productive“ allows the inner lawyer to argue that scrolling social media for industry news counts as productive. “I want to move more“ allows walking to the fridge to count as movement. The standard dissolves because the standard was never specific or concrete. A binary metric answers a single question with a ‘yes’ or ‘no.’ Did the timer hit zero? Did I open the document? Did I record the completion of my workout in my journal? There is no partial credit. There is no “it depends.” The standard is either met or it is not. And the feedback is immediate. This is what the body does every second. Oxygen saturation. Blood sugar. Temperature. Each metric returns a clear value and the system adjusts accordingly. Your system needs the same clarity. The Scope of Effort The fourth component is a Scope of Effort that scales to match current capacity. A rigid routine has one operating mode. One speed. One intensity. When life disrupts that single mode, the entire routine collapses. A resilient system has tiers describing the metric involved. Each tier preserves the behaviour. The only variable is the intensity, measured in time, quality, or a subjective estimate based on personal experience. In my system there are four tiers: Crawl The lowest tier is Crawl. This is your non-negotiable. It is designed to be so small that skipping it feels absurd. Two minutes of movement at the lightest possible exertion. The subjective criteria is: “There is no way I will not get this done today. Too easy.“ Crawl exists to keep the streak alive when conditions are at their worst. It is the most important tier in the entire system. If Crawl survives, the system survives. This is the Floor that I mentioned earlier. Walk The next tier is Walk. This is your reasonable, doable baseline. 10 to 20 minutes at a comfortable level of effort. The subjective criteria is: “Yeah. I can do that.“ Walk is what you can comfortably expect to execute as you go about your normal daily schedule and tasks. It is not aspirational. It is sustainable. Run Above that is Run. This is your standard of personal excellence. 21 to 60 minutes at a challenging but manageable intensity. The subjective criteria is: “This is what I aspire to do. This is me at my best.“ Run is what you aim for on days when energy and time are both available. Fly The highest tier is Fly. This is beyond your expectation. 61 to 180 minutes or more at near-maximum output. The subjective criteria is: “Wow. Where did that come from?“ Fly is not something you schedule. It’s something that happens when conditions align and the session takes over. It is flow state. Not a target. A gift. The Scope of Effort is not about lowering standards. It’s about building a system with enough redundancy to survive real life. The body does this continuously. Heart rate scales from resting to maximum output in seconds. Respiration adjusts breath by breath. Your system will work best with a similar range. This takes practice to implement with accuracy and will evolve with your skills and growing experience. The Written Protocol The fifth component is a written protocol that stabilizes everything. Your working memory holds roughly four chunks of information. It cannot simultaneously store the Floor, the trigger, the binary metric, the Scope of Effort scale, and execute the action. Something gets dropped. Maybe even be the most important thing. A written document acts as an external hard drive. It specifies every component in concrete terms. For example: * When I get to the gym, then I review my planned workout and begin my warm up within 5 minutes of signing in at the front desk. Success means I’ve completed my warm up and I’m ready to do my workout. Crawl is completing 2 minutes of the warm up. Walk is completing the warm up and 15 minutes of the workout. Run is completing the warm up and the entire 30 minute workout. The protocol is reviewed briefly before the action begins. Maybe in the car before walking into the gym. Then you lock it. The protocol does not change daily based on mood. If the trainer (System 2) is inconsistent, the student (System 1) receives conflicting data and learns something you haven’t planned. Write it once. Lock it for a fixed cycle. Execute without any negotiation. Review only between cycles, not within them. The Loop These five components form a structure. But structure alone is not a system. A system includes feedback. At the end of each week, review the binary metrics. Did you do what you said you’d do? If yes, what conditions supported that? If no, what in the design failed? Remember, you don’t want to ask, “What is wrong with me?“ That is not helpful and leads to no effective learning. Instead, you want to stay objective and ask, “What in the architecture failed to account for what happened?“ Then adjust one variable. Keep it to one. Not a complete redesign. One change, tested for another week, and reviewed again. The loop mirrors the body: * observe, * compare against the standard, * act, * receive feedback, * adjust, * repeat. The system learns. The architecture adapts. The behaviour becomes more effective and resilient over time. What Survives Intensity without continuity produces nothing long-term. A system that keeps you moving at 20 percent capacity indefinitely outperforms a routine that demands 100% effort and collapses in six weeks. The Floor over the ceiling. Crawl over the heroic push. Consistency over intensity. Build the architecture; work the system; the routine will take care of itself. Next Time Next, in the final episode of this series, we’ll look at * how to integrate the system into identity, * the DO-BE-HAVE sequence, * the 84-day commitment as the container, * and the role of values as the root that feeds the entire structure making consistency the default output rather than a sporadic surprise. An Invitation When you’re ready to turn consistency from an idea into a lived experience, start your Day 1 inside The ACT Score Challenge [https://www.skool.com/exercising-self-control-1199/about]. That’s it for today. Catch you next time. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit stoicstrength.substack.com [https://stoicstrength.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

13 jul 202613 min

308. The Myth Of Learning From Failure

Beschrijving

Reacties

Probeer 14 dagen gratis

Alle afleveringen