Kansas Helen Podcast

Ed Young - Kansas House District 27 - Full Conversation

58 min · 27 jun 2026
aflevering Ed Young - Kansas House District 27 - Full Conversation artwork

Beschrijving

Ed Young is running for Kansas House District 27 in the August 4th Democratic Primary. Young begins by answering whether he knows what it feels like to “not have one more penny.” He affirms that he does, recalling his and his wife’s student years at KU when they had to scrape together enough money for a weekly Whopper from Burger King. He remembers making soup in a coffee pot, breaking it, and not having enough money to replace it. He also talks about growing up in a duplex with his grandfather and how his grandparents helped his family through childhood. Young then discusses his Kansas roots. He says he was born in Ohio and moved to Kansas at age 10. He describes growing up near 127th and Black Bob in Olathe, returning to that neighborhood, and observing how some surrounding areas have changed while the neighborhood itself still feels familiar and nostalgic. Young explains that several issues triggered his decision to run, including the fact that no one else had filed in the district as the deadline approached. He expresses frustration with his current representative’s approach toward the school district and local government. He discusses House Bill 2299, the cellphone ban issue, and Blue Valley’s estimated cost to implement the proposed requirements. Young states his concern is not just whether phones are good or bad in schools, but that a statewide mandate does not fit every school district, campus, classroom, or safety plan. Young connects this issue to his background as a first responder, police officer, firefighter, and workforce development center director. He talks about planning for school violence response on a campus with multiple buildings and explains why he would not want his child in a school where students had no access to a phone in an emergency. He argues that cellphone and screen policies should be handled locally because each district has different needs, including rural districts that may use screens to provide programming they otherwise could not offer. Young also covers his experiences as state director of aviation. He describes how programs sometimes had to be designed with the fear that leftover funds could be swept or changed before the end of the year, even when programs were already established, bids were ready, and the Legislature had previously allocated money. Young explains that the situation became even more complicated when state projects were paired with federal money or federal funding was delayed. Young discusses the August 4 judicial amendment vote from the perspective of an attorney who has voted on judicial nominating committees. He pushes back on the idea that the Kansas Bar Association controls the process, stating he is a member of the bar but not the Bar Association, and that licensed attorneys in each congressional district vote for nominating committee members. The conversation also covers Supreme Court statistics, how few cases reach the Supreme Court, retention votes, the 2022 abortion amendment, and concerns about trying to change judicial selection to achieve a predetermined political outcome. A major part of the conversation focuses on AI data centers and transparency. Young says Kansas has bigger issues to address than targeting marginalized communities, including groundwater, industrial development, the aviation industry, economic growth, and major projects like Panasonic. He says people want transparency about economic impact, jobs, environmental concerns, tax incentives, and public accountability. Young criticizes broad incentives for AI data centers and argues that communities need a voice before large projects receive public benefits. Young also talks about the risks of rushing development without planning for future consequences. He compares AI data center development to earlier waves of oil wells and cell phone towers, where communities were later left with abandoned or unsafe infrastructure and unclear responsibility. He says Kansas should ask who is responsible if a project fails, becomes obsolete, or leaves behind buildings, water demands, or infrastructure needs that local governments cannot manage. When asked why voters should choose him in the August primary, Young says he respects his opponent and would support her if she wins, but believes his Kansas experience makes him a strong candidate. He points to his work for KDOT, his place in the Kansas Aviation Hall of Fame, his planning work during wind energy growth, his budgeting experience, his education at KU, his teaching for Kansas State University, and his service as a firefighter, police officer, EMT, and disaster response worker. He also discusses the district’s mix of Republican, Democratic, and unaffiliated voters and says his experience can help him compete in November. The interview spends significant time on school funding, vouchers, and special education. Young says Republicans he speaks with are also raising concerns about schools, and he points to the Blue Valley School District’s lawsuit over the funding formula and special education. He says private school vouchers shift more responsibility onto property taxpayers because private schools are not required to serve special education students in the same way public schools are. He argues that strong public schools are part of what makes communities valuable and that weakening those schools would hurt families and property owners alike. Young also discusses the importance of paras and special education support in classrooms. He says his daughter, who teaches in a rural district, has told him that paras make it possible to teach the class and provide specialized support for students who need additional help. The conversation connects special education funding to real families, the legal obligation to serve students, and the long-term value of investing in children rather than treating them as a burden. When asked for the top issues in District 27, Young names schools, AI, and transportation. He talks about 69 Highway, congestion, growth moving south through Johnson County, coordination between cities and the county, and the need for better transportation planning. He also discusses the loss of older transportation options, the challenge of being car-dependent, and water as a long-term Kansas issue tied to agriculture and the future of the state. Young frames long-term planning as one of the deeper themes of the conversation. He describes progressivism as systemic thinking and says Kansas needs to plan for changes in industries and technology before problems arise. He points to wells, cell phones, windmills, and AI data centers as examples of issues where the state should build systems that protect Kansans over time instead of reacting to each situation only after it becomes urgent. The conversation also covers high-speed rail, light rail, and infrastructure protection. Young says existing rail infrastructure could potentially be improved and that better rail options could benefit Kansas, especially for people who need affordable travel, rural healthcare access, or transportation between communities. He also discusses short line rails, grain, aviation manufacturing, the role of rail in Kansas’ economy, and the importance of protecting infrastructure in small towns rather than constantly building new infrastructure farther south while older communities fade. Young closes with his campaign message, “Think Young.” He says the phrase is not only a slogan but also a call to think progressively about what Kansans can achieve together. He talks about community, shared values, experiencing other cultures, and building from people’s existing strengths. The interview ends with a broader message about restoring balance in Topeka and approaching Kansas politics with more cooperation, planning, and respect for the people affected by state decisions. You can now also watch on Kansas Helen YouTube or listen on the Kansas Helen Podcast on Apple and Spotify. Get full access to Kansas Helen at kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe [https://kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

Reacties

0

Wees de eerste die een reactie plaatst

Meld je nu aan en word lid van de Kansas Helen Podcast community!

Probeer gratis

Probeer 14 dagen gratis

€ 9,99 / maand na proefperiode. · Elk moment opzegbaar.

  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort
  • 20 uur luisterboeken / maand
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle afleveringen

285 afleveringen

aflevering Eli Woody - Kansas House District 31 - Everything Is Political artwork

Eli Woody - Kansas House District 31 - Everything Is Political

Eli Woody is running for Kansas House District 31 in the August 4th Democratic Primary. Kansas House District 31 is in Kansas City, Kansas, including the Rosedale and Argentine neighborhoods.. In this section, the conversation turns from neighborhood life to the way politics shows up in everyday needs. Woody talks about raising a toddler in a neighborhood full of young kids and connects sidewalks, schools, and child safety to the decisions made by local and state government. See the full interview on Kansas Helen Substack and learn more about Kansas House District 31 here: https://kansashelen.substack.com/s/kansas-house You can now also watch on Kansas Helen YouTube or listen on the Kansas Helen Podcast on Apple and Spotify. Reminder: Vote NO on Amendment 1: Elections for Supreme Court Justices. For more information, visit: https://protectkansasrights.org/ #Kansas #2026elections #2026Primary #ksleg #Vote Get full access to Kansas Helen at kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe [https://kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

17 jul 20262 min
aflevering Eli Woody - Kansas House District 31 - Meet the Candidate artwork

Eli Woody - Kansas House District 31 - Meet the Candidate

Eli Woody is running for Kansas House District 31 in the August 4th Democratic Primary. Kansas House District 31 is in Kansas City, Kansas, including the Rosedale and Argentine neighborhoods. This opening section introduces Woody and House District 31. He explains that the district is entirely in Kansas City, Kansas and includes Rosedale and Argentine, then talks about why he and his wife intentionally chose to live in Wyandotte County. See the full interview on Kansas Helen Substack and learn more about Kansas House District 31 here: https://kansashelen.substack.com/s/kansas-house You can now also watch on Kansas Helen YouTube or listen on the Kansas Helen Podcast on Apple and Spotify. Reminder: Vote NO on Amendment 1: Elections for Supreme Court Justices. For more information, visit: https://protectkansasrights.org/ #Kansas #2026elections #2026Primary #ksleg #Vote Get full access to Kansas Helen at kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe [https://kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

17 jul 20263 min
aflevering Eli Woody - Kansas House District 31 - Full Conversation artwork

Eli Woody - Kansas House District 31 - Full Conversation

Eli Woody is running for Kansas House District 31 in the August 4 Democratic primary. District 31, located in Kansas City, Kansas, includes the Rosedale and Argentine neighborhoods. Woody described the district as “solidly Kansas City, Kansas,” differentiating it from districts that span multiple cities, counties, or rural areas. Although not originally from the district, Woody and his wife intentionally moved to Wyandotte County. He hails from Topeka, and his wife is from Baldwin City. He cited their shared roots in northeast Kansas and his father’s family’s historical ties to Wyandotte County, which he characterized as “diverse, working-class, genuine, down-to-earth, and full of history.” Woody highlighted how Wyandotte County is often overlooked or underestimated, drawing a parallel to how places like Kansas City, Kansas, and Topeka are sometimes discussed by those who do not truly understand them. Woody’s campaign is founded on the belief that communities like his deserve direct representation, free from outside assumptions. Community emerged as an early theme. Woody spoke about living in a neighborhood where several nearby homes, including his own, have young children. He emphasized the value of families supporting each other and building community with neighbors, immediately connecting this to politics. For Woody, politics is inseparable from daily life. He used sidewalks as an example: if children walk to elementary school and there are no sidewalks, that constitutes a political issue impacting their safety and whether basic needs are met. He noted that even those who claim not to follow politics are affected by political decisions daily. This idea permeated the rest of the conversation. Issues were consistently linked to real life: sidewalks, schools, rent, groceries, property taxes, healthcare, safety, and whose voices are heard in Topeka. A core tenet of Woody’s message is representation. He argued that the most effective way to protect working-class people, marginalized communities, Black Kansans, queer Kansans, and other groups losing rights is to elect more individuals who genuinely come from those communities. He stated that working-class people have waited “forever” for wealthy and privileged politicians to advocate for them, to no avail. Similarly, he noted that Black Kansans and queer Kansans have also waited for sufficient political representation. Woody, who is Black and queer, is the only person of color remaining in the race for District 31. He finds this significant because the district is diverse, with a large Latino population. The current representative, a Latino man, is retiring after over 20 years. Woody argues that representatives should reflect the district’s demographics and lived experiences for people to see themselves reflected in government. He connected this to the phrase “for the people, by the people,” stating that “by the people” should mean representatives genuinely come from their communities, not just that voters cast a ballot. Woody believes Kansans should be led by people who understand them, not solely by wealthy or insulated politicians. Woody is running to win and, upon reaching the State House, wants to continue fighting for working-class people and champion the retiring representative’s causes. He described himself as loud, direct, and committed to working-class Kansans. As a high school English and public speaking teacher, communication is a key promise. He believes communication is about relationships, not just polished speeches, which has driven him to knock on over 1,500 doors. He plans to listen to constituents, bring their concerns to the State House, and then explain the outcomes. Woody’s ideal role when the Legislature is not in session is to be back on people’s porches, discussing legislative outcomes, his voting record, and whether constituents feel well-represented. He plans to use mail, social media, door-knocking, and in-person conversations to maintain communication after the election, arguing that effective representation requires staying in touch long after votes are counted. Regarding winning, Woody acknowledged District 31 is heavily Democratic, with Republicans often losing by significant margins or not running. However, he emphasizes meeting voters face-to-face, noting that some voters told him he was the only candidate they had seen at their door, which he believes makes a difference. The discussion explored the rise of unaffiliated voters and the potential exodus of Democrats and marginalized Kansans from the state. Woody highlighted that state laws making people feel unsafe could prompt them to leave Kansas, particularly marginalized individuals seeking safer areas. This led to a broader conversation about the stakes in Kansas politics for those considering departure if the government becomes more hostile towards queer, disabled, neurodivergent, and other marginalized communities. Woody agreed that many are currently assessing Kansas’s viability as a safe place to live. Participants introduced the August 4 amendment concerning elections for Kansas Supreme Court justices as part of this political context. They emphasized informing unaffiliated voters of their eligibility to vote on this crucial amendment, urging participation even from those disillusioned or disinclined to vote in every race. Woody expressed readiness for the political fight. The conversation then shifted to the Kansas House supermajority and how candidates should explain its significance to the public. Woody noted that while political insiders understand its implications, many voters do not. He stressed the need to simplify this concept, linking it to the common understanding that political dysfunction arises when one side holds enough power to act unilaterally, bypassing debate or compromise. Woody asserted that true debate is absent because the controlling party is not compelled to listen. In Kansas, he argued, the Republican supermajority allows uncompromising Republicans to pass legislation without engaging Democrats. He suggested that removing some unyielding Republicans is necessary to restore genuine debate. The discussion then focused on making the supermajority’s impact tangible for voters. The central point was that if the Legislature could pass bills targeting transgender Kansans, it also had the power to address critical issues like property taxes, prescription costs, healthcare, and housing. Woody advised candidates engaging Republican and unaffiliated voters to ask if their representatives are actively working to make prescriptions or property taxes more affordable. If costs are spiraling, especially for those on fixed incomes, voters should question their representatives’ priorities. Woody argued that the message should directly address people’s financial struggles. He believed that soaring costs for essentials like insulin, asthma medication, housing, healthcare, rent, groceries, and property taxes should be the starting point of any conversation. He contended that these problems persist because the supermajority faces no pressure to negotiate. Losing Republican unchecked control would force them to engage with the opposition and account for spiraling costs. The topic of working-class representation arose again when Woody pointed out that many Republican representatives do not personally struggle with grocery bills or property taxes. He argued that numerous lawmakers lack the lived experience of constituents facing economic hardship, making them less likely to champion working-class causes. The discussion also explored party control. Woody stated that Republican lawmakers can face internal party punishment for not adhering to leadership’s voting preferences, including losing privileges like parking passes. This led to a broader conversation about balance. The ultimate goal was not to replace one unchecked supermajority with another, but to achieve a Legislature that truly reflects Kansas. Kansas was characterized as more purple than red, with Republicans, Democrats, and unaffiliated voters all constituting significant portions of the electorate. The conversation emphasized that Topeka should mirror this diverse mix. The participants discussed representation not only in terms of political party but also race, class, ethnicity, and lived experience. Woody agreed that Kansas needs greater representation from currently underrepresented communities in the State House. Toward the end, the conversation shifted to public speaking, active listening, and the sacrifices inherent in campaigning. The participants highlighted Woody’s background in speech and debate as a strength, describing him as someone who actively listens, processes information thoroughly, and responds directly to the conversation rather than simply reciting pre-prepared answers. Woody championed speech and debate as an invaluable skill. The conversation also acknowledged the inherent challenges of public speaking and the extensive demands placed on candidates. Campaigning, door-knocking, attending events, answering questions, fundraising, and maintaining constant availability can consume a candidate’s life. Woody was on summer break from teaching during the campaign, but he clarified that summer is not simply leisure time for teachers; it is time they reclaim after dedicating far more hours than typically assumed during the school year. This naturally transitioned into a discussion about teacher workload and compensation. Teachers often work well over 40 hours a week, dedicate time outside the classroom to preparation, communicate extensively with parents, and may still require second jobs or additional work during breaks. The conversation underscored the illogical disparity, pointing out that teachers with degrees and years of experience might earn a similar income to legislators, despite teaching being a full-time and emotionally demanding profession. Woody plans to teach in the fall and take leave during the spring legislative session, believing active teachers are crucial in the State House. He argues that active public school teachers offer a distinct perspective due to their current immersion in the system. He emphasized this point, noting he teaches five out of seven periods, with approximately 30 students per class, totaling around 150 students each semester. He communicates with many parents and guardians, joking he already has “constituents.” This comparison highlights how teaching—through constant communication, listening, negotiation, explanation, and collaboration—has prepared him for representation. Woody stated that public education has prepared him to work in one “broken system” because he already works in another. This aligns with his campaign message: he is not an outsider but someone working within stretched, underfunded, and difficult-to-navigate systems. The conversation presented Woody as a working-class candidate, a teacher, a person of color, a queer Kansan, and someone who views representation as more than a title. His core argument is that those experiencing problems firsthand should be present during decision-making. He wants District 31 to have a representative who remains engaged long after election season. His closing message announced his candidacy for Kansas House District 31 in KCK (Rosedale and Argentine). He directed people to woodyforkansas.com and mentioned he is actively knocking on doors. Acknowledging his dislike for campaign “money games,” he stressed that small donations help cover literature, thank-you cards, yard signs, and voter communication. The central theme was that Kansas politics should be more connected to its people. Woody discussed issues like sidewalks, public schools, prescriptions, property taxes, healthcare, housing, marginalized people leaving Kansas, and working-class individuals being ignored by lawmakers who don’t share their struggles. His campaign is built on the belief that District 31 deserves a present, communicative, and community-rooted representative. Get full access to Kansas Helen at kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe [https://kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

17 jul 202649 min
aflevering Amelia Wiederaenders - Kansas House District 30 - Current Political Climate artwork

Amelia Wiederaenders - Kansas House District 30 - Current Political Climate

Amelia Wiederaenders is running for Kansas House District 30 in the August 4th Democratic Primary. Kansas House District 30 includes parts of Olathe, Lenexa, and Shawnee. The final marker looks at the current political climate in Kansas. The conversation covers the number of Democratic and Republican primaries, the rise in unaffiliated voters, and the possibility that Kansans are shifting away from party labels. Wiederaenders also talks about the difference between national frustrations with Democrats and the local Democrats she knows in the Kansas State House. She says she has always wanted to be in politics, but only when the time, place, and responsibility made sense. For District 30, she says that time is now. See the full interview on Kansas Helen Substack and learn more about the Kansas House District 30 Democratic primary here: https://kansashelen.substack.com/s/kansas-house You can now also watch on Kansas Helen YouTube or listen on the Kansas Helen Podcast on Apple and Spotify. Reminder: Vote NO on Amendment 1: Elections for Supreme Court Justices. For more information, visit: https://protectkansasrights.org/ #Kansas #2026elections #2026Primary #ksleg #Vote Get full access to Kansas Helen at kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe [https://kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

17 jul 20263 min
aflevering Amelia Wiederaenders - Kansas House District 30 - Kansas Republican Messaging artwork

Amelia Wiederaenders - Kansas House District 30 - Kansas Republican Messaging

Amelia Wiederaenders is running for Kansas House District 30 in the August 4th Democratic Primary. Kansas House District 30 includes parts of Olathe, Lenexa, and Shawnee. In this section, Wiederaenders talks about Republican messaging in District 30 and what she is seeing from Laura Williams’ campaign. She says Williams is trying to present herself as a free thinker and using images with Democratic figures, but Wiederaenders argues the legislative record still matters. The conversation also covers the Republican supermajority, bathroom bills, midnight votes, gut-and-go tactics, lack of public comment, and the need to bring balance back to the Kansas State House. See the full interview on Kansas Helen Substack and learn more about the Kansas House District 30 Democratic primary here: https://kansashelen.substack.com/s/kansas-house You can now also watch on Kansas Helen YouTube or listen on the Kansas Helen Podcast on Apple and Spotify. Reminder: Vote NO on Amendment 1: Elections for Supreme Court Justices. For more information, visit: https://protectkansasrights.org/ #Kansas #2026elections #2026Primary #ksleg #Vote Get full access to Kansas Helen at kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe [https://kansashelen.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

Gisteren7 min