Standard Charter CEO creates international incident with "lower-value human capital" quip, then explains he was right; 99% of CEOs expect layoffs; MIT says AI completes most text-based tasks by 2029

Beschrijving

A Bank CEO Called His Employees “Lower-Value Human Capital.” Then He Apologized. Then He Explained That He Was Right. On Tuesday, May 19, Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters stood before investors at a briefing in Hong Kong and described his bank’s plan to cut nearly 8,000 jobs by 2030. The framing he chose was precise. Winters said [https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/2026/05/22/stanchart-ceo-apologizes-for-lower-value-human-comments/90216291007/] the cuts were not cost-cutting but rather “replacing in some cases lower-value human capital with the financial capital and the investment capital we’re putting in.” The reaction was immediate. Former Singapore President Halimah Yacob condemned the terminology publicly on Facebook, [https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/standard-chartered-ceo-apologizes-for-lower-value-human-comments-126052200844_1.html]calling it disturbing to describe workers in such clinical terms. Criticism spread across social media and through Standard Chartered’s key operating hubs in Singapore, Hong Kong, and India, where senior management and staff responded with visible anger. Asian regulators held discussions with the bank following the remarks. Winters sent a memo to staff on Wednesday saying the reporting was taken out of context and that affected workers would receive good advance notice. On Friday morning, Winters posted a fresh LinkedIn message doubling down on the substance of his remarks. Hours later he posted again, this time with an apology. “My choice of words has caused upset to some colleagues. For that I am sorry,” [https://www.thenationalnews.com/future/technology/2026/05/22/bill-winters-apology-standard-chartered-ai/] he wrote. He added that the bank would “continue to speak honestly about the impact of technological change.” Three days. One statement. Two reversals. The substance did not change between Tuesday and Friday. The framing did. Winters had said plainly what most corporate communications carefully avoid saying, that workers in certain roles are interchangeable inputs measured by the value they generate, and that AI inputs cost less. The backlash confirmed that workers understood exactly what he meant. HSBC Delivered the Same Message in Softer Language The day Winters sent his reassurance memo, HSBC CEO Georges Elhedery delivered his own communication to the bank’s 211,000 employees. The message was structurally identical to Winters’ but arrived in warmer packaging. Elhedery urged staff [https://allwork.space/2026/05/hsbc-tells-workers-not-to-fight-ai-while-admitting-its-destroying-banking-jobs/]to make sure they were not fighting the change, not disenfranchised, and not anxious or resisting. [https://allwork.space/2026/05/hsbc-tells-workers-not-to-fight-ai-while-admitting-its-destroying-banking-jobs/] He said AI could make them “more productive versions of themselves.” He also said, plainly, that generative AI will destroy certain jobs while creating new ones. HSBC is reviewing plans [https://www.aol.com/articles/dont-fight-ai-hsbc-ceo-104455000.html]to cut approximately 20,000 roles over the next three to five years, representing roughly 10 percent of its global workforce. The cuts target middle and back-office functions. The bank has appointed a Chief AI Officer and is using AI to reduce client onboarding time by 50 percent. Morgan Stanley analysts confirmed in the same week [https://www.resultsense.com/news/2026-05-21-hsbc-ceo-dont-fight-ai-bank-job-cuts/]that banking, technology, and professional services firms shed one in 20 staff in the past year as a direct result of AI adoption, with offshore workers and entry-level employees absorbing the largest share of those losses. The two largest London-listed Asia-focused banks made essentially the same announcement within 24 hours. Standard Chartered named the number and used the language that caused a diplomatic incident. HSBC named the number and chose its words more carefully. The outcome for the workers affected is the same. 99 Percent of CEOs Expect AI-Driven Layoffs Within Two Years The Standard Chartered and HSBC announcements did not arrive in isolation. Mercer’s Global Talent Trends 2026 report [https://www.mercer.com/about/newsroom/mercer-s-global-talent-trends-2026-report/], drawing on surveys of nearly 12,000 executives, HR leaders, investors, and employees across 16 countries, found that 99 percent of CEOs expect corporate AI initiatives to lead to layoffs in the short term. Only 32 percent said they believed the workforce could optimally combine both human and machine capabilities. The worker side of the same survey is equally direct. Only 44 percent of employees reported thriving at work in 2026 [https://gizmodo.com/99-of-ceos-expect-ai-driven-layoffs-in-the-next-two-years-2000762994], down from 66 percent in 2024 and lower than during the COVID pandemic. Employee concern about job loss due to AI has risen from 28 percent in 2024 to 40 percent in 2026. A workforce operating at those anxiety levels cannot deliver the productivity gains executives are promising investors. That contradiction sits at the center of every AI transformation plan currently in motion. AI Is Now the Leading Stated Reason for U.S. Layoffs In April, AI led all stated reasons for U.S. job cuts [https://www.challengergray.com/blog/challenger-report-april-job-cuts-rise-38-from-march-ytd-cuts-down-50/]for the second consecutive month, with 21,490 announced layoffs attributed directly to AI. That represented 26 percent of all April cuts. AI has been cited for 49,135 job cut announcements so far in 2026, accounting for roughly 16 percent of all job cut plans year to date, per Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The Challenger data carries a specific limitation worth naming. It counts only layoffs in which companies voluntarily cite AI as the reason. It does not count roles eliminated through hiring freezes, contractor non-renewals, or restructurings where AI is the mechanism but not the stated cause. The actual displacement figure is larger than the Challenger number reflects. Researchers Are Now Naming the Anxiety Workers Feel Mercer’s research found that 62 percent of employees [https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/20/ai-impacting-labor-market-like-a-tsunami-as-layoff-fears-mount.html] believe leaders underestimate AI’s emotional and psychological impact on workers. Only 19 percent of HR leaders consider those impacts as part of their digital implementation strategy. Researchers are now proposing a clinical term for the condition: AI Replacement Dysfunction, or AIRD, describing the specific anxiety pattern produced by working in a role you believe will be automated before you can leave it voluntarily. The Standard Chartered episode illustrates why that anxiety is grounded. A King’s College London study [https://www.resultsense.com/news/2026-05-21-hsbc-ceo-dont-fight-ai-bank-job-cuts/] released the same week found six in 10 Britons believe AI will eliminate more jobs than it creates, and one in five expect civil unrest as a result. Workers are not misreading the situation. They are reading the investor briefings. The AI/Labor Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. MIT Researchers: AI Will Complete 80-95 Percent of Text-Based Work Tasks by 2029 MIT FutureTech researchers [https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01363] evaluated AI capabilities across more than 3,000 work tasks drawn from the U.S. Department of Labor’s O*NET database, drawing on more than 17,000 evaluations by actual workers in those roles. They found AI models successfully completing tasks that take humans three to four hours at a 50 percent success rate in mid-2024, rising to 65 percent by late 2025. If current capability growth continues, AI will complete most text-related tasks at an 80 to 95 percent success rate by 2029. That timeline covers the remaining working years of most people currently employed in the occupations Standard Chartered, HSBC, and the consulting firms discussed this week are actively reducing. The MIT assessment is not a prediction about a distant future. For the workers in those roles, 2029 is three performance review cycles away. Get full access to The AI/Labor Report at ailabor.substack.com/subscribe [https://ailabor.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

Jobs vanish without layoff announcements; Intuit fires the very workers who built it and buy it; 142,000 tech jobs gone; 6 million clerical workers can't adapt; they're already using the tools

The Jobs That Quietly Disappear A Yale analysis [https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/the-real-job-destruction-from-ai-is-hitting-before-careers-can-start]finds that the biggest labor market impact of agentic AI will not appear in layoff data. It will instead appear in opportunities that quietly disappear before anyone notices. Entry-level roles that companies stop posting. Hiring pipelines that close without explanation. First jobs that never get created. The researchers describe the average firm’s response to AI not as mass layoffs but as silently closing the door to new workers. The distinction matters because the second version produces no accountability. There is no date, no memo, no severance package, and no WARN filing. There is only a graduating class that finds the door closed when it arrives. For instance, C.H. Robinson announced it is handling 29% more freight volume today than it did in early 2019 [https://fortune.com/2026/04/29/ai-agentic-entry-level-jobs-disappearing-yale-celi-sonnenfeld/] while employing 30% fewer workers. AI agents book roughly half of its carrier bookings. The company did not announce a mass layoff. It simply stopped needing the same number of people to do the same amount of work. The jobs did not disappear dramatically. They evaporated. The Company That Cut 17% of Its Workforce While Selling AI to Its Own Customers Intuit cut 3,000 workers, representing 17% of its global headcount, on May 20. [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-layoffs-hiring-entry-level-workers/] The company makes TurboTax and QuickBooks. Its products serve tens of millions of American small businesses and independent filers. The workers who built and maintained those tools are now gone. The stated reason for the layoff is a shift toward AI. The practical result is that the same company selling AI-powered accounting tools to small business owners just eliminated the human workforce that built those tools. Cutting the people while selling the product to the customers those people served describes how the displacement cycle closes the loop. The small business owner using QuickBooks is the customer. The QuickBooks employee who lost her job is also the customer. The AI product is now serving both of them while employing fewer of the people who made it possible. BUY NOW! [https://wimdodson.gumroad.com/l/gods_in_the_machine?_gl=1*19da5a0*_ga*MTEwMjE2MDkwMy4xNzc2OTY4MDQy*_ga_6LJN6D94N6*czE3NzY5NjgwNDEkbzEkZzEkdDE3NzY5NjgxNzIkajU5JGwwJGgw] Get the NEW Book that exposes the Narratives Tech uses to build its AI Empire. $4.95 flat fee for Kindle, Nook, Tablets, and Mobile. No subscription required.3.5-hr reading time. The Layoffs That Are Not Making Business Sense CIO Magazine [https://www.cio.com/article/4171054/ai-driven-layoffs-arent-making-business-sense.html] published an analysis this month examining whether AI-driven layoffs are producing the results companies claimed they would. The piece focuses on Block’s decision to cut 40% of its workforce after projecting gross profits of nearly $12 billion for 2026. A technology leadership analyst quoted in the piece asks directly: “Who at that decision table was talking about the human cost of firing 4,000 people?” The piece concludes that the move was economically unnecessary given the company’s financial position. The question the piece raises is the one the Forrester research flagged earlier this year. Companies are making permanent workforce decisions based on AI efficiency projections that have not yet arrived. In other words, the AI tools that justified the cuts are still being assessed. The workers who were cut are gone. The Running Total Just Hit 142,000 Tech Times reported [https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317392/20260529/tech-layoffs-reach-142000-2026-profitable-companies-cut-jobs-fund-700b-ai-infrastructure.htm] on May 29 that tech sector layoffs in 2026 have reached 142,000, with Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta committed to a combined $700 billion in capital expenditure. Stanford HAI data cited in the piece shows software developer employment for workers under 26 fell nearly 20% since 2024. Wharton management professor Peter Cappelli describes the dynamic [https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317392/20260529/tech-layoffs-reach-142000-2026-profitable-companies-cut-jobs-fund-700b-ai-infrastructure.htm] as companies announcing layoffs by claiming AI will cover the work while the AI has not yet done so. The Workers Least Able to Recover Are the Ones Nobody Is Talking About A Brookings Institution and Centre for the Governance of AI analysis [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/measuring-us-workers-capacity-to-adapt-to-ai-driven-job-displacement/] published in February identifies 6.1 million American workers who face both high AI exposure and low adaptive capacity. These are secretaries, office clerks, payroll processors, receptionists, and tax preparers. Of these workers, 86% are women. Financial analysts scored 99% for adaptive capacity on the study’s measure. Office clerks scored 22%. These occupations are concentrated in smaller cities, university towns, and midsized markets in the Mountain West and Midwest. These workers are not the demographic the AI labor debate centers on. The debate centers on software engineers, lawyers, and accountants because those are the people writing about it. The 6.1 million clerical and administrative workers facing maximum exposure and minimum ability to recover are not writing Substack posts about their situation. They are answering phones, processing invoices, and preparing tax returns in Boise and Cheyenne and Lansing, and the policy response building in Sacramento and Washington is not designed with them specifically in mind. BUY NOW [https://wimdodson.gumroad.com/l/invasion_ai?_gl=1*g1iey2*_ga*OTc1NjU2NTcyLjE3NzQwMzA3NjM.*_ga_6LJN6D94N6*czE3NzQwMzMyMjUkbzIkZzEkdDE3NzQwMzQ2ODgkajYwJGwwJGgw]! Get the book that examines how the AI invasion already happened. You just weren’t invited. $9.95 flat fee for Kindle, Nook, Tablets, and Mobile. No subscription required. 2-hr reading time. They Are Already Using the Tools That Threaten Their Jobs The American Society of Administrative Professionals 2026 State of the Profession Report [https://www.asaporg.com/articles/the-ai-conversation-is-missing-something-about-administrative-professionals/] finds that more than three-quarters of administrative professionals already use AI daily in their work. It’s the same population that Brookings identifies as most exposed and least able to adapt. Ironically, it is also the population most actively integrating AI into daily tasks. They are using the tools. They are learning the workflows. They are doing what every piece of career advice tells them to do. The AI/Labor Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Using AI daily, however, does not close the gap between a 22% adaptability score and a 99% one. It does not replace the savings, the educational credentials, the broad skill set, or the access to a strong urban job market that the Brookings measure identifies as the actual determinants of who recovers when their role disappears. Get full access to The AI/Labor Report at ailabor.substack.com/subscribe [https://ailabor.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

1 jun 20267 min

IMF says AI is shrinking the middle class; 134,000 tech jobs gone this year; Upwork fires the workers it sells work to; Citi cutting 20,000; two CEOs soften their AI Jobpocalypse story before they IPO

The Middle Class Is the Target The International Monetary Fund does not typically frame its research in personal terms. Its January 2026 “Staff Discussion Note” on AI and new job creation [https://www.imf.org/en/publications/staff-discussion-notes/issues/2026/01/09/bridging-skill-gaps-for-the-future-new-jobs-creation-in-the-ai-age-572136] does. https://www.imf.org/en/publications/staff-discussion-notes/issues/2026/01/09/bridging-skill-gaps-for-the-future-new-jobs-creation-in-the-ai-age-572136The IMF finds that in regions with higher demand for AI-related skills, employment levels are 3.6% lower in occupations that are highly exposed to AI but offer limited scope for human-AI complementarity. The workers absorbing those losses are in entry-level and middle-skilled roles. Listen on Apple Podcasts [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-ai-labor-report/id1896663061] About one in ten job vacancies in advanced economies now demands at least one new AI-related skill [https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2026/01/14/new-skills-and-ai-are-reshaping-the-future-of-work]. Those vacancies pay more. The jobs that do not require new AI skills are paying less and disappearing faster. So, AI skill premiums benefit workers at the top of the wage distribution. Workers at the bottom are also benefiting indirectly through service consumption. The group in between absorbs the displacement without capturing the gains. That group is the middle class. The IMF is an institution that chooses its words carefully. It used the phrase “contributing to the shrinking of the middle class” in a published research note. JPMorgan Just Put $40 Million on the Table for the Workers the IMF Is Describing Jamie Dimon arrived at a similar conclusion through a different route. In March, the JPMorgan CEO declared that the American Dream was “slipping out of reach for too many people.” This week JPMorgan published details of a $40 million small-business investment program [https://fortune.com/2026/05/27/jamie-dimon-american-dream-jpmorganchase-40-million-small-business/]. The program routs grants through community development financial institutions toward the communities his bank’s own data identifies as falling behind. JPMorgan’s own research finds that fewer than 10% of new businesses reach $1 million in revenue within five years. The structural disadvantage is concentrated among founders who lack inherited wealth or strong professional networks. The Freelance Economy’s Version of Work Degradation The online contract platform Upwork based its entire business on the premise that human knowledge work is abundant. It just cut a quarter of its own staff. Upwork CEO Hayden Brown announced on May 7 [https://officechai.com/ai/upwork-lays-off-25-of-its-workforce-says-ai-will-lead-to-smaller-teams/] that the company would reduce its workforce by approximately 25%. Her memo, published on Upwork’s website, stated: “Two pizza teams are dead. AI means smaller, differently resourced teams in product and engineering can make a bigger impact than ever.” BUY NOW! [https://wimdodson.gumroad.com/l/gods_in_the_machine?_gl=1*19da5a0*_ga*MTEwMjE2MDkwMy4xNzc2OTY4MDQy*_ga_6LJN6D94N6*czE3NzY5NjgwNDEkbzEkZzEkdDE3NzY5NjgxNzIkajU5JGwwJGgw] Get the NEW Book that exposes the Narratives Tech uses to build its AI Empire. $4.95 flat fee for Kindle, Nook, Tablets, and Mobile. No subscription required.3.5-hr reading time. The irony in the announcement is that Upwork exists to connect businesses with independent knowledge workers: writers, designers, developers, analysts, and marketers. Those are precisely the categories where AI has displaced freelancers most aggressively. Writing projects on Upwork fell 32% year over year in 2025. [https://www.selfemployed.com/news/ai-freelance-platforms-2026/] The CEO of the platform built on freelance demand is cutting staff because the demand for the work the platform sells has contracted. The displacement has an additional dimension. A customer support specialist or content writer displaced from one platform cannot simply apply for the same role at a competitor. Every competitor is reducing that function simultaneously. https://www.vaasblock.com/news/ai-layoffs-workforce-restructuring-cloudflare-coinbase-2026/Read my substack article “How to Ford ‘Amodei’s Moat:’ A Worker’s Guide to the AI Labor Shift [https://futureforwarded.substack.com/p/how-to-ford-amodeis-moat-a-workers]“ to find out how and why AI is making a career change in the labor marketplace has become more difficult. Nevertheless, the supply of mid-market writing, design, and support work is declining across the entire market, not redistributing to a different platform. [https://www.vaasblock.com/news/ai-layoffs-workforce-restructuring-cloudflare-coinbase-2026/] That is the structural unemployment dimension of 2026 that the aggregate statistics are not capturing. BUY NOW [https://wimdodson.gumroad.com/l/invasion_ai?_gl=1*g1iey2*_ga*OTc1NjU2NTcyLjE3NzQwMzA3NjM.*_ga_6LJN6D94N6*czE3NzQwMzMyMjUkbzIkZzEkdDE3NzQwMzQ2ODgkajYwJGwwJGgw]! Get the book that examines how the AI invasion already happened. You just weren’t invited. $9.95 flat fee for Kindle, Nook, Tablets, and Mobile. No subscription required. 2-hr reading time. The Running Total Just Crossed 134,000 A real-time tracker updated today [https://skillsyncer.com/layoffs-tracker]puts the 2026 tech sector layoff total at 134,603 workers across 212 layoff events since January 1. The pace is faster than the same period in 2025. Companies are simultaneously cutting in content creation, customer support, data entry, and basic coding while expanding in AI safety, machine learning operations, and AI-human collaboration roles. The workers being cut and the workers being hired are different people with different skills in different cities. The tracker number has grown by more than 20,000 since Tuesday. Citigroup Is Executing the Final Phase of Its 20,000-cuts Job Plan Citigroup filed WARN notices in New Jersey this week [https://www.thelayoff.com/citigroup] covering separations scheduled between May 21 and June 14, 2026, as part of an AI automation and restructuring strategy. [https://www.thelayoff.com/citigroup] The filings are part of Citi’s multi-year plan to eliminate 20,000 jobs across its global workforce by the end of this year. CFO Mark Mason has stated that headcount will keep declining as AI tools take hold across middle-office and operational functions. WARN notices are public legal documents. They put job losses on the record in a way that earnings call language does not require. The Citigroup filings this week describe tellers, back-office analysts, compliance staff, and IT support workers whose roles are being phased out as AI monitoring systems and automated processes replace them. These are the banking sector equivalents of the workers the IMF is tracking in its middle-class polarization data. The IPO Motive Behind the Week’s Altman Drama This week began with Sam Altman speaking to a group in Sydney and saying the jobs apocalypse he had warned about had not arrived. That story, covered in Tuesday’s edition, acquired a second dimension on Wednesday. Fortune reported [https://fortune.com/2026/05/26/sam-altman-dario-amodei-walking-back-ai-jobs-apocalypse-prophecies-ipo/] that both Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei have publicly reversed their most alarming predictions about AI job losses, with the timing coinciding directly with IPO preparations. OpenAI is targeting a late 2026 public listing at a valuation near $1 trillion. Anthropic is planning a 2026 offering at approximately $380 billion. Amodei previously warned that 50% of white-collar jobs faced elimination within several years. He now frames automation as a productivity multiplier. “If you automate 90% of the job,” he said this month, “then everyone does the 10% of the job.” The 10%, he argues, expands to fill 100% of what people do and multiplies their output tenfold. The argument is coherent as economic theory. It describes a future in which workers remain employed and become more productive. It doesn’t seem, though, that many CEOs are treading the “pro-worker” path of AI use. The Yale Budget Lab Data Altman and Amodei Are Leaning On The aggregate stability data that both CEOs are now citing as evidence their earlier predictions were wrong comes from the Yale Budget Lab’s ongoing labor market tracker. The Yale research [https://mlq.ai/news/altman-and-amodei-walk-back-ai-job-apocalypse-warnings-ahead-of-trillion-dollar-ipos/]finds no significant shifts in occupational mix or unemployment for high-AI-exposure jobs since ChatGPT’s 2022 launch. The AI/Labor Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. The same research notes that occupational shifts already visible in 2021 were underway before generative AI tools became widely available. The Yale data measures employed workers in formal occupations. It counts people who are in the system. It does not count the contractors, gig workers, and the freelancers who used to work on Upwork. Further, it does not account for the early-exit buyout takers who have already left formal employment and fall outside the tracking algorithms the aggregate statistics rely on. The stability finding is accurate for the population the Yale Report measures.However, that population is getting smaller. Get full access to The AI/Labor Report at ailabor.substack.com/subscribe [https://ailabor.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]

29 mei 20269 min

Standard Charter CEO creates international incident with "lower-value human capital" quip, then explains he was right; 99% of CEOs expect layoffs; MIT says AI completes most text-based tasks by 2029

Beschrijving

Reacties

Probeer 14 dagen gratis

Alle afleveringen