The Honest Broker Podcast

Listen at Apple Podcasts here [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/interview-with-kelvin-droegemeier/id1687813793?i=1000619390447] About Kelvin Droegemeier, Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin_Droegemeier], University of Oklahoma [http://meteorology.ou.edu/member/kelvin-droegemeier/] Dr. Droegemeier’s forthcoming book, Demystifying the Academic Research Enterprise My past interviews with presidential science advisors: * John H. Marburger III [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/marburger.html] — George W. Bush * John H. Gibbons [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/gibbons.html] — Bill Clinton * Neal Lane [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/lane.html] — Bill Clinton * George Keyworth II [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/keyworth.html] — Ronald Reagan * Frank Press [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/press.html] — Jimmy Carter * Edward E. David, Jr. [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/david.html] — Richard Nixon * Donald Hornig [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/scienceadvisors/hornig.html] — Lyndon Johnson For further reading: Pielke Jr. R. & Klein, R. 2009. The rise and fall of the science advisor to the president of the United States. Minerva, 47:7-29. (PDF [https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/admin/publication_files/resource-2719-2009.05.pdf]) This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit rogerpielkejr.substack.com/subscribe [https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

The episode is free to all. Please consider a share, a comment or subscription. Enjoy! Episode notes: * Hohenkammer Workshop report [http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/research_areas/sparc/research/projects/extreme_events/munich_workshop/workshop_report.html] * A Primer on Egregious Errors in IPCC WG2 on Disasters [http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2010/01/primer-on-egregious-eroors-in-ipcc-wg2.html], published ~3 weeks before the London debate * The misleading graph inserted into the IPCC report * The Sunday Times article [http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2010/01/welcome-sunday-times-readers.html] that motivated the London debate * My debate with IPCC AR4 WG2 co-chair Christopher Field on BBC Newsnight [http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2010/02/bbc-newsnight-on-ipcc.html], the same week as the London debate * Foreign Policy’s Guide to Climate Skeptics [https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/02/26/the-fp-guide-to-climate-skeptics/] (2010) * Full audio of the London debate, large file (.wav [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zuOOLxWp8NftM3qEXGzNajD4F5JnQuwM/view?usp=share_link]) This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit rogerpielkejr.substack.com/subscribe [https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rogerpielkejr.substack.com [https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] Episode Notes * A tip from an IPCC insider (link [https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/a-tip-from-an-ipcc-insider]) * Several follow up Twitter threads (here [https://twitter.com/RogerPielkeJr/status/1656276876699254784?s=20] and here [https://twitter.com/RogerPielkeJr/status/1656285678467174400?s=20]) * Upcoming online discussion of university climate education (register here [https://www.eventbrite.com/e/restoring-the-sciences-the-climate-question-tickets-612293565537], free) * A “cap-tie” rule for elite trans athletes (link) * Reasonable accommodations for inclusion of trans athletes in elite sport (link [https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/the-problems-with-outright-eligibility])

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit rogerpielkejr.substack.com [https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] An experiment! Let me know what you think. Some questions: * 12 minutes, too long? Too short? * Content? More? Different? * Guests? Yes/no? * What else?