The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 3) (6/27/26)

Lord Conrad Black And His Defense Of Prince Andrew

Lord Conrad Black, a controversial media magnate and convicted felon pardoned by former President Trump, entered the Prince Andrew controversy with a highly defensive stance that framed the royal as a victim of disproportionate post-Epstein scrutiny rather than someone whose conduct merited accountability. In opinion pieces, Black insisted it was “a disgrace” that Prince Andrew was isolated and stripped of honors over a civil lawsuit tied to allegations about his association with Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the withdrawal of titles by Queen Elizabeth II was unjustified given there had been no criminal conviction or definitive finding of wrongdoing against the Duke of York. Black leaned heavily on the presumption of innocence and cast the legal and media pressure on Andrew as a kind of “frenzied assault” fueled by a sensationalist system that targets powerful men, rather than focusing on survivor testimony or the deep entanglement between Epstein’s network and elite figures. Critics of Black’s defense have argued that his position misses the core issue — not whether Andrew was criminally convicted, but whether his behavior and associations with Epstein were reckless, harmful, and deserving of vigorous scrutiny. By minimizing the severity of allegations and focusing on perceived procedural unfairness, Black’s commentary was seen by many as protective of privilege rather than supportive of truth or justice, particularly given the emerging documentary evidence showing Andrew’s ongoing contact with Epstein even after public backlash. His framing also glossed over the substantive harm experienced by survivors and the pattern of evasive responses from Andrew himself, reducing a complex reckoning over power, influence, and alleged sexual exploitation to a narrative about misplaced outrage — a stance that critics say aligns with a long tradition of elites defending elites at the expense of victims’ voices and accountability. Strictly public sources do not confirm every claim made here; Black’s commentary focused on defending reputation and criticizing the backlash, but the broader context includes documented serious allegations and responses from royal and legal authorities. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Alan Dershowitz Co-Signs For Ghislaine Maxwell

Alan Dershowitz, the high-profile defense attorney who once represented Jeffrey Epstein and helped negotiate his controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement, has been one of the most vocal advocates for Ghislaine Maxwell in the public arena since her arrest and conviction. He has argued publicly that Maxwell could provide critical information about Epstein’s network if offered incentives such as immunity and has suggested that law enforcement should cut a deal with her in exchange for cooperation with Congress and prosecutors, framing her as a potential key witness with deep knowledge of Epstein’s operations. Dershowitz has consistently attacked media coverage and critics of Maxwell, asserting that speculation about her role in procuring underage girls for Epstein extends beyond the judicial record and venturing into dangerous, unproven territory — positions that have drawn widespread skepticism given the gravity of the crimes and the number of victims who testified at trial His defense extends beyond tactical legal suggestions to broader public messaging that downplays or questions the strength of allegations tied to Epstein’s inner circle, all while he himself has been the subject of civil allegations connected to the Epstein case that he vigorously denies. Critics say that Dershowitz’s arguments serve to protect the powerful and shift focus away from accountability for abuse, pointing out that his calls for a transactional approach to Maxwell’s testimony risk minimizing the voices of survivors and obscuring the systemic failures that enabled Epstein’s crimes. By positioning Maxwell as an “underdog” or “source of truth” primarily in terms of political utility rather than moral responsibility, Dershowitz’s public defense has become part of a broader controversy over how powerful insiders are shielded even in the wake of clear evidence and convictions. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bill Gates Denies He Has Ever Been To Little Saint James

Bill Gates’ representatives denied claims circulating online that he repeatedly visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little St. James. A spokesperson for Gates said the allegation was false and stated that Gates had never been to the island. The denial came after social media posts alleged Gates had traveled there dozens of times, tying him to one of the most notorious locations associated with Epstein’s sex-trafficking allegations. Gates’ team did acknowledge that Gates had met with Epstein in the past, but said those meetings were connected to philanthropy and global health discussions, not visits to Epstein’s island. The claims about repeated island trips were also challenged by available flight-log reviews, which did not show evidence that Gates traveled to Little St. James dozens of times. Gates’ connection to Epstein remained controversial because the meetings happened after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, but the specific claim denied was that Gates repeatedly visited Epstein’s island. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill Gates didn't visit sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein's island repeatedly [https://nypost.com/2020/05/15/bill-gates-didnt-visit-sex-criminal-jeffrey-epsteins-island-repeatedly/]

Virginia Roberts Blasts Alan Dershowitz Claims Of Exoneration

Virginia Giuffre rejected Alan Dershowitz’s claim that he had been fully exonerated after their defamation fight ended in a settlement. Dershowitz had publicly celebrated the resolution, pointing to Giuffre’s statement that she “may have made a mistake” in identifying him as one of the men Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her to. He treated that language as proof that he had been cleared. Giuffre, however, made clear that the settlement did not mean a court had vindicated him, did not mean a jury had found in his favor, and did not give him the right to declare himself officially exonerated. Giuffre’s position was that ending the lawsuit was not the same thing as proving Dershowitz’s version of events. The litigation had dragged on for years, both sides had accused the other of lying, and the settlement closed the case without a trial or a legal finding on the underlying allegation. Dershowitz has always denied Giuffre’s claims, but Giuffre pushed back against his attempt to turn the settlement into a public-relations victory. Her message was simple: the case may be over, but Dershowitz does not get to rewrite that ending as total exoneration just because he says so. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-says-alan-dershowitz-is-not-exonerated-no-matter-what-he-says [https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-says-alan-dershowitz-is-not-exonerated-no-matter-what-he-says]

The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 3) (6/27/26)

The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy. One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf [https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf]