Behind the Slides

Episode 3: Manni Mohyuddin, MBBS

54 min · 30. apr. 2026
episode Episode 3: Manni Mohyuddin, MBBS cover

Description

Episode 003 — Manni Mohyuddin, MD Why does so much clinical research never make it to publication—and what does that mean for the evidence we trust? In this episode of Behind the Slides, we sit down with Manni Mohyuddin to examine how incentives shape the research ecosystem. We discuss the gap between conference abstracts and eventual publication, what gets published (and what doesn’t), and how these dynamics influence the evidence base that clinicians rely on. A conversation about bias, incentives, and how research becomes “truth” in medicine.

Comments

0

Be the first to comment

Sign up now and become a member of the Behind the Slides community!

Get Started

1 month for 9 kr.

Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

All episodes

4 episodes

episode Adam Mastroianni: Episode 004 artwork

Adam Mastroianni: Episode 004

In this episode of Behind the Slides, Scott Matson sits down with Adam Mastroianni to explore the incentives, institutions, and hidden cultures that shape modern science. Using Adam’s widely discussed essays on scientific publishing, peer review, and the replication crisis as a starting point, the conversation expands into a broader discussion about how scientific systems reward productivity, novelty, and institutional survival—and whether those incentives are compatible with genuine discovery. Topics include: * Why scientific publishing may function more like a prestige economy than a truth-seeking system * The tension between transformational ideas and peer review * Whether NIH-style funding structures inherently favor incrementalism * Science as a “strong-link problem” and concerns about the future pipeline of creative scientists * The apprenticeship nature of scientific training and Adam’s “crock pot” analogy for how scientific culture is absorbed * Why labs may unintentionally reproduce both epistemic virtues and epistemic pathologies * The replication crisis, publication bias, and the incentives surrounding positive findings * Whether modern academia still attracts highly agentic, unconventional thinkers * What kinds of scientific environments actually produce original and rigorous scientists Rather than treating science as a purely rational machine, the discussion examines it as a deeply human system shaped by psychology, incentives, identity, prestige, and culture. Experimental History by Adam Mastroianni: https://www.experimental-history.com [https://www.experimental-history.com/]

14. maj 202655 min