How We Know What Isn’t So — Why False Beliefs Feel Rational (Audio)

Description

Welcome to Crisis in Perception, where we examine the systems shaping our world. This episode explores How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life by Thomas Gilovich as a systems-level investigation into how people form beliefs that feel rational, coherent, and evidence-based—even when the evidence does not support them. Gilovich argues that questionable beliefs often arise from flawed rationality rather than irrationality. Pattern detection, memory, causal explanation, social learning, and motivation are usually useful tools. But when they encounter random patterns, incomplete data, vivid anecdotes, secondhand information, or emotionally charged conclusions, those same tools can generate false certainty. This Deep Dive examines the hidden belief-formation system behind everyday error: how randomness becomes pattern, how anecdotes become evidence, how explanations protect assumptions, and how social repetition makes private belief feel like public truth. Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/s8q2IjfhjKY Watch the Mini Explainer: [Mini Explainer link] Support the project on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/CrisisinPerception/posts/how-we-know-what-163367114?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link Author Support If these ideas resonate, consider reading the work yourself or borrowing it from your local library. Supporting authors and libraries helps keep critical inquiry accessible. If you value systems-level analysis like this, please follow, rate, and share the project. AI Use Disclosure This content was created using AI-assisted tools for research synthesis, structuring, and narration support. All analysis, framing, and editorial decisions are guided by human judgment as part of the Crisis in Perception project.

Living with a Wild God: A Nonbeliever’s Search for the Truth About Everything — Who Defines Reality?

An unexplained experience does not become understood merely because we assign it a familiar name. Welcome to Crisis in Perception, where we examine the systems shaping our world. Using Living with a Wild God: A Nonbeliever’s Search for the Truth About Everything by Barbara Ehrenreich as our lens, this investigation explores how societies determine which experiences count as reality—and how unusual perceptions become classified as revelation, illness, illusion, or evidence. Ehrenreich approaches her own past as an atheist, scientist, and investigative reporter. The memoir follows her attempt to understand a series of adolescent perceptual episodes and a powerful encounter at Lone Pine without converting them into religious proof or dismissing them through psychiatric terminology alone. At a systems level, the episode examines epistemic boundary-setting: the role of language, shared reality, religion, psychiatry, and scientific institutions in determining what can be discussed and investigated. The central tension is between skepticism and openness. Skepticism protects inquiry from unsupported conclusions, but rigid skepticism can exclude inconvenient evidence before it has been seriously examined. The investigation considers perception, dissociation, ineffability, institutional categories, explanatory reduction, and the challenge of remaining intellectually rigorous in the presence of uncertainty. 📺 Watch the Deep Dive on YouTube: https://youtu.be/yEfvz0pK-4I ❤️ Support / Episode Post on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/CrisisinPerception/posts/living-with-wild-163470963?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link If these ideas resonate, consider reading the work yourself or borrowing it from your local library. Supporting authors and libraries helps keep critical inquiry accessible. If you value systems-level analysis like this, please follow, rate, and share the project. This content was created using AI-assisted tools for research synthesis, structuring, and narration support. All analysis, framing, and editorial decisions are guided by human judgment as part of the Crisis in Perception project.

Yesterday19 min

How We Know What Isn’t So — Why False Beliefs Feel Rational (Audio)

Description

Comments

1 month for 9 kr.

All episodes