Everybody Gets Pie's Podcast
Why do so many Americans say housing costs are a top concern — but still oppose new housing in their neighborhoods? UC Davis law professor Chris Elmendorf shares surprising research revealing that aesthetics and feelings about developers may matter more than self-interest or NIMBYism. In this conversation, we cover: - Why just saying the word "developer" drops support for new housing by 4+ points - How Hollywood has generated an estimated 1 billion negative representations of developers - Why "small local homebuilder" gets a dramatically different reaction than "big real estate developer" - What a video of a developer rescuing dogs has to do with housing policy - Why ugly buildings hurt housing support even among renters who would benefit from lower rents - The vacancy chain concept — and why it's one of the most persuasive arguments for building more housing - The story of how a Twitter thread helped revive California's "builder's remedy" law - What the pro-housing movement should actually focus on to win long-term This is the Season 1 finale of Everybody Gets Pie. Tune in for another season soon! Follow & Support Everybody Gets Pie X: @pie4everybody [https://x.com/pie4everybody] Bluesky: @everybodygetspie.bsky.social YouTube: @EverybodyGetsPie [https://www.youtube.com/@EverybodyGetsPie] Instagram: @everybodygetspie [https://instagram.com/everybodygetspie] TikTok: @everybodygetspie 🎙️ Subscribe, share, and let us know who you’d like to hear on the next episode!
15 Folgen
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der Everybody Gets Pie's Podcast-Community!